[Ž‘—¿]»–òŠeŽÐ»•i”„ã(¢ŠE)




 Medical Letter“ú–{Œê”łłÍAŽQlƒf[ƒ^‚Æ‚µ‚ÄŽsêƒf[ƒ^‚𒲸‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚邪A
 ‘ã•\“I‚È»–òŠé‹Æ‚ÌAnnual Report‚©‚绕i”„ã‚Ì•”•ª‚𔲈‚µ‚½‚à‚Ì‚ð‚±‚±‚ÅŒfÚ‚·‚éB

œˆ×‘ÖƒŒ[ƒg
ˆ×‘ÖƒŒ[ƒgˆê——[Infoseek]
[02.1.15]$[USD]=\131.16, Euro[EUR]=\116.98, ’[GBP]=\189.89, SFr[CHF]=\79.088, DKK=\15.73
[02.12.25]$[USD]=\120.45, Euro[EUR]=\124.10, ’[GBP]=\191.97, SFr[CHF]=\85.52 , DKK=\16.71
[04.01.18]$[USD]=\106.57, Euro[EUR]=\131.83, ’[GBP]=\191.56, SFr[CHF]=\84.12 , DKK=\17.79
[05.01.05]$[USD]=\104.14, Euro[EUR]=\138.08, ’[GBP]=\196.07, SFr[CHF]=\89.09 , DKK=\18.58,‹$=79.62,ƒJƒiƒ_$=84.96,NZ$=72.73
[06.02.01]$[USD]=\118.00, Euro[EUR]=\142.40, ’[GBP]=\209.40, SFr[CHF]=\91.51 , ‹$=88.85,ƒJƒiƒ_$=103.37,NZ$=80.65
[07.01.01]$[USD]=\117.91, Euro[EUR]=\139.53, ’[GBP]=\203.26, SFr[CHF]=\? ,‹$=86.48,ƒJƒiƒ_$=100.47,NZ$=79.40
[07.02.01]$[USD]=\121.96, Euro[EUR]=\158.99, ’[GBP]=\241.55, SFr[CHF]=\98.060,‹$=95.76,ƒJƒiƒ_$=104.48,NZ$=?
[08.01.04]$[USD]=\110.28, Euro[EUR]=\162.60, ’[GBP]=\219.47, SFr[CHF]=\99.25,‹$=98.23,ƒJƒiƒ_$=111.88,ŠØ‘100W=11.90(),DKK=21.53 ,NZ$=83.20
[09.01.01]$[USD]=\90.25, Euro[EUR]=\127.02, ’[GBP]=\130.08, SFr[CHF]=\85.19,‹$=62.38,ƒJƒiƒ_$=74.05,ŠØ‘100W=6.38(),DKK=15.54 ,NZ$=52.13, ’†‘Œ³=12.99, ƒƒVƒAƒ‹[ƒuƒ‹=2.70
[10.01.04]$[USD]=\93.33, Euro[EUR]=\134.32, ’[GBP]=\153.92, SFr[CHF]=\90.50,‹$=85.40,ƒJƒiƒ_$=90.15,ŠØ‘100W=8.20(),DKK=18.15 ,NZ$=69.01, ƒƒVƒAƒ‹[ƒuƒ‹=3.32
[11.01.04]$[USD]=\82.78, Euro[EUR]=\110.57, ’[GBP]=\130.55, SFr[CHF]=\88.40,‹$=85.40,ƒJƒiƒ_$=83.93,ŠØ‘100W=7.49(),DKK=14.93 ,NZ$=65.22, ƒƒVƒAƒ‹[ƒuƒ‹=2.94
[11.12.30]$[USD]=\78.74, Euro[EUR]=\102.21, ’[GBP]=\123.81, SFr[CHF]=\83.59,‹$=81.12,ƒJƒiƒ_$=77.82,ŠØ‘100W=6.95(),DKK=13.85 ,NZ$=62.15, ƒƒVƒAƒ‹[ƒuƒ‹=2.68,CNY (’†‘Œ³)=12.71
* “úŒoƒlƒbƒgFƒ}ƒl[•ƒ}[ƒPƒbƒgFŠO‘ˆ×‘ÖƒNƒƒXƒŒ[ƒg[]
* ˆ×‘ÖƒŒ[ƒg‰ß‹Žƒf[ƒ^[]
* ŠO‘ˆ×‘Ö‘Šê‰ß‹Ž—š—ð[]


œ»–òŠé‹Æƒjƒ…[ƒXƒTƒCƒg
Business.com :Pharmaceuticals - Web Sites
 --- Žû˜^€–Úprofile | financials | competitors | people 
 --- Žû˜^€–ÚAstraZeneca| Aventis| Bayer AG| Bristol-Myers Squibb| Eli Lilly
GlaxoSmithKline| Johnson & Johnson| Merck & Co| Novartis AG| Novo-Nordisk A/S
Pfizer| Roche Holding Ag| Schering-Plough

Hoovers Online
PR Newswire : Company News Archive: Health/Biotech |Annual Report

œˆã–ò•iŽsêƒjƒ…[ƒXƒTƒCƒg
šIMS Health News Release
[]
[]
[]



¡ŒÂ•Ê»–ò‰ïŽÐ
šA-Fs šG-Ks
Abbott
ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“
TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.[US]
@`•ÄAbbott‚Æ•“c–ò•i‚ÌJV *Abiogen Pharma S.p.A[ˆÉ] Abraxis BioScience Inc. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc[US] Acorda Therapeutics Inc[•Ä‘] Actelion Ltd[ƒXƒCƒX]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ ƒAƒNƒeƒŠƒIƒ“@ƒtƒ@[ƒ}ƒVƒ…[ƒeƒBƒJƒ‹ƒY@ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ Adams Laboratories Inc.[US]`ŒÄ‹zŠí޾г–òê–åƒ[ƒJ[ Aderis Pharmaceuticals Adolor Corporation[•Ä] AEterna Zentaris Inc.[Ca]@¡ƒoƒCƒIˆã–ò @--Zentaris GmbH[GE] Affymax, Inc. Agouron Pharmaceuticals ¨see Pfizer @Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚ÍA
Warner-Lambert‚É”ƒŽû‚³‚ꂽ[1999.5]B @‚»‚ÌŒãPfizer‚ÍAWarner-Lambert‚ð
‹zŽû‡•¹‚µ‚½(2000.6.19)B ŠÖ˜A‹LŽ– @Œ»ÝAgouron“ÆŽ©‚ÌWeb-site‚͂Ȃ¢B Akorn, Inc.`Šá‰È–ò“™‚Ìê–åƒ[ƒJ[ AKZO Novel N.V. Organon -AKZO NovelŽq‰ïŽÐ “ú–{ƒIƒ‹ƒKƒmƒ“ Alcon Laboratories,Inc.@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší “ú–{ƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší Alfa Wassermann S.P.A.[ˆÉ] Alkermes, Inc.[US] Allergan ƒAƒ‰ƒKƒ“ Almirall Prodesfarma, S.A.[SP] Allos Therapeutics, Inc Alpharma Inc. Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc(‹ŒBoston Life Sciences, Inc.) Altana AG Altana Pharma AG[‹ŒByk-Gulden AG]@ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ2007.1¨Nycomed Alza Corporation - J&JŽq‰ïŽÐ American BioScience, Inc.[ABI,ABS]@¨ Abraxis BioScience Inc. American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (APP)@¨ Abraxis BioScience Inc. Amersham Amersham Health(‹Œ Nycomed Amersham Imaging) ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€ ƒoƒCƒIƒTƒGƒCƒ“ƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ “ú–{ƒƒWƒtƒBƒWƒbƒNƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ Amgen ƒAƒ€ƒWƒFƒ“ Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc ASTA Medica AG(Degussa AG‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ)@¨Degussa AG Anesiva,Inc[•ÄG‹ŒCorgentech Inc] Ark Therapeutics Group plc[‰p‘] AstraZeneca ƒAƒXƒgƒ‰ƒ[ƒlƒJ AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc@¨Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.[‹ŒAVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc]•Ä‘ƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Aventis@‡•¹¨Sanofi-Aventisƒw Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.[US] ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒXƒtƒA[ƒ}iŠ”j Aventis Behring
@¨•ÏXZLB Behring [‹Œ]Aventis Behring(2004.5•ÏX) @¨ see CSL Limited[ƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒA]‚ÌŽP‰º‚É ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒX ƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒO ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ
ZLBƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ
[‹Œ]ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒX ƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒO ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ(2004.5•ÏX) Aventis Pasteur@2005.1ŽÐ–¼•ÏX¨Sanofi Pasteur SA[FR,ƒƒNƒ`ƒ“] Aventis Pasteur -US@2005.1ŽÐ–¼•ÏX¨Sanofi Pasteur Inc. -US[US,ƒƒNƒ`ƒ“] ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒXƒpƒXƒc[ƒ‹@¨ƒTƒmƒtƒBƒpƒXƒc[ƒ‹[‹ŒƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒXƒpƒXƒc[ƒ‹] Dermik Laboratories[US] šAventisŽq‰ïŽÐ Avanir Pharmaceuticals,Inc. AVI BioPharma, Inc. Avigen, Inc[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Banner Pharmacaps Inc[US] š»Ü‹Zp Barr Laboratories Inc.@¨2008”N12ŒŽTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.[ƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹]‚É”ƒŽû Bausch & Lomb@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší ƒ{ƒVƒ…ƒƒ€EƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší Baxter Healthcare Corp@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší ƒoƒNƒXƒ^[Дޮ‰ïŽÐ@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší Bayer AG ƒoƒCƒGƒ‹–ò•i Beaufour-IPSEN ¨Ipsen Group[FR] Becton, Dickinson and Company@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší “ú–{ƒxƒNƒgƒ“ƒfƒBƒbƒLƒ“ƒ\ƒ“ @¡ˆã—Ë@Ší Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc[US]`Mylan Laboratories,Inc.‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ BioAlliance Pharma SA[FR] Biocodex[FR] Biogen IDEC Inc.[2003.11 Biogen/IDEC‡•¹] BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ bioMerieux SA[FR]@¡f’f–ò bioMerieux Inc.[US]@¡f’f–ò “ú–{ƒrƒIƒƒŠƒ…[Дޮ‰ïŽÐ@¡f’f–ò Biovail Corporation[‰Á] Boehringer Ingelheim “ú–{ƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒK[ƒCƒ“ƒQƒ‹ƒnƒCƒ€ ‹ŒBoston Life Sciences, Inc.@¨Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc Bristol-Myers Squibb[BMS] ƒuƒŠƒXƒgƒ‹Eƒ}ƒCƒ„[ƒYДޮ‰ïŽÐ Medarex,Inc[BMSŽÐ‚É2009.9.1”ƒŽû] Bryan Corporation[US] BTG International Ltd[UK] Altana Pharma AG ©[‹ŒByk-Gulden AG]@ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ2007.1¨Nycomed Cambridge Laboratories Ltd[UK]`ƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Canyon Pharmaceuticals Celgene Corporation[US] Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.[‹ŒAVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc]•Ä‘ƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Celltech Group[‰p‘]`ƒoƒCƒIŠé‹Æ2004.7 UCB‚É‚æ‚蔃Žû Cell Therapeutics, Inc.[US]`§Šà܃xƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Centocor ¨- Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc - J&JŽP‰º | Johnson & JohnsonŽP‰º Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc - J&JŽP‰º Cephalon Inc@¨2011”N08ŒŽTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.[ƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹]‚É”ƒŽû Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA ChironNovartisŽq‰ïŽÐ‚É(2006) CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ciba Vision Corporation[NovartisŒn—ñ] ƒ`ƒoƒrƒWƒ‡ƒ“[NovartisŒn—ñ] Corgentech Inc@¨Anesiva,Inc[•ÄG‹ŒCorgentech Inc] Cornerstone Therapeutics Inc.[US] Covidien plc[ƒAƒCƒ‹ƒ‰ƒ“ƒh] ƒRƒ”ƒBƒfƒBƒGƒ“ ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ[‹Œƒ^ƒCƒRƒwƒ‹ƒXƒPƒAEƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ] “ú–{ƒRƒ”ƒBƒfƒBƒGƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ[‹Œ“ú–{ƒVƒƒ[ƒEƒbƒhДޮ‰ïŽÐ] CSL Limited[ƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒA] CSL Behring[•Ä] ‚b‚r‚kƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ ZLB Behring [‹Œ]Aventis Behring(2004.5•ÏX)@¨CSL Behring[•Ä] Aventis BehringCSL Behring[•Ä] ZLBƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ
[‹Œ]ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒX ƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒO ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ(2004.5•ÏX)@¨‚b‚r‚kƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ *Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc[•Ä] CV Therapeutics, Inc[US] Cypress Bioscience, Inc[US] Debiopharm SA[SZ]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Degussa AG(2008.9 Evonik Industries AG‚Ì‚P•”–å)@ŽQl @1990 Temmler Group ‚𔃎û @1993 Muro Pharmaceutical Inc‚Ì20.4%Ž‘–{ŽQ‰ÁAMuro Pharmaceutical Inc‚𔃎û[1996.10.1] @2001.6 Degussa‚ªASTA MedicaŽq‰ïŽÐAWD.pharma‚ðPLIVA‚É”„‹pB @@AWD.pharma‚Í‹ŒArzneimittelwerk Dresden GmbH @@ˆö‚Ý‚ÉArzneimittelwerk Dresden GmbH‚Í2004.7 Hexal AG‚É‚æ‚èÄ”ƒŽûB @2001 BaxterŽÐ‚ÉASTA Medica Onkologie GmbH & CoKGŽÐ‚𔄋p@i‚ª‚ñŽ¡—Öò•ª–ì‚Éioj ‘Ή¿525 million Euros (U.S. $470 million). @@(ASTA Medica AG‚Í1983”NˆÈ—ˆDegussa AG‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ‚ÅAOncology, Health Products, awd.pharma @@ and Zentaris.‚ÌŠe•”–å;2004.6 e‰ïŽÐDegussa AG‚ªZentaris GmbH‚ðAEterna Labs‚É”„‹pB) @Asta Werke AG‚Í1970”N‘ã––‚ÉDegussa‚ɉߔ¼”‚ðŽx”zA1983”NŠ®‘SŽq‰ïŽÐ‚ÉB @1987@Chemiewerk Homburg Branch, Asta Werke AG“™‚ª‡•¹‚µAsta Pharma AG‚ÉB @1991@Arzneimittelwerk Dresden GmbH‚𔃎ûB @@¨ASTA Medica AG @@¨“ÆViatris‚É•ÏX@¨Meda AB Dendreon Corporation[US] Dermik Laboratories[US] šAventisŽq‰ïŽÐ DEY, L.P Discovery Laboratories, Inc.[•Ä‘] Dusa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[US]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Dyax Corp ECR Pharmaceuticals[US] Elan Corporation, plc[IR]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.[US]`_ŒoŒn–òÜê–åƒ[ƒJ[ Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc`¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[ Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[US] ¨2005.11 OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[US]‚É”ƒŽû Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A[ƒXƒyƒCƒ“] Ferring Pharmaceuticals[ƒXƒCƒX] FibroGen, Inc. First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation[US]`¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[@¨Sciele Pharma, Inc. Forest Laboratories, Inc. Fournier Pharma[FR]
Galderma S.A.[•§] ...L'Oreal & Nestle‚Ì50:50‡•Ù‰ïŽÐ[Ý—§1981]
Galderma USA
ƒKƒ‹ƒfƒ‹ƒ}Дޮ‰ïŽÐ
L'Oreal[•§]
Galen Holdings Plc[ƒAƒCƒ‹ƒ‰ƒ“ƒh]
@@ŽÐ–¼•ÏX¨Warner Chilcott, Inc.[•Ä‘](‹ŒGalen Holdings Plc¨2004)
Gedeon Richter Ltd[HU]
Genentech, Inc - RocheŽP‰º
General Electric Company[GE]
GE Health
*Genmab A/S[DE]
Genome Therapeutics Corporation[US]@
‡•¹¨@Oscient Pharmaceuticals Corporation[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Genzyme Corporation
ƒWƒFƒ“ƒUƒCƒ€EƒWƒƒƒpƒ“
Gilead Science
Glaxo SmithKleine[GSK]
ƒOƒ‰ƒNƒ\EƒXƒ~ƒXƒNƒ‰ƒCƒ“
Graceway Pharmaceuticals LLC[•Ä]
GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc[•Ä]
Grunenthal GmbH[“Æ]
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.[•Ä]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[@¨2005.10 MGI Pharma,Inc[•Ä‘]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[‚É”ƒŽû
Helsinn Healthcare SA[ƒXƒCƒX]
Hollister-Stier Laboratories[US]
Hospira,Inc
ƒzƒXƒs[ƒ‰EƒWƒƒƒpƒ“
Laboratoire HRA Pharma[•§]
Human Genome Sciences, Inc
Institut Biochimique SA[IBSA]-[SZ]
ICOS
Lilly-ICOS
Immunexš2001.12 Amgen‚É‚æ‚锃Žû‚ɇˆÓB
Imclone Systems Inc.@V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Idenix Pharmaceuticals,Inc[‹ŒNovirio Pharmaceuticals, Inc]@V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
IDM Pharma, Inc[•Ä] - 2009.5 •“c–ò•iŽP‰º‚É
Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
INOTECH Biotechnologies Ltd.
Ikaria
INO Therapeutics
InSite Vision Inc[US]
Insmed Inc.[US]@V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc@V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Intendis GmbH(Schering AG‚ÌŠO—p–òê–åŽq‰ïŽÐ)
Institut Biochimique SA[IBSA]-[SZ]
Intermune Inc.`¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Ipsen Group[FR]
Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.`¡ƒoƒCƒIƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
ISTA Pharmaceuticals,Inc
IVAX Corporation[US]@¨Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.[ƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹]2006.1”ƒŽû
Jazz Pharmaceuticals,Inc.
Jerini AG[“Æ]`V–òƒoƒCƒIŠé‹Æ
Johnson & Johnson
Centocor ¨Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc - J&JŽP‰º
Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc - J&JŽP‰º
Janssen - J&JŽP‰º
ƒ„ƒ“ƒZƒ“ ƒtƒ@[ƒ}Дޮ‰ïŽÐ
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals@[J&J Œn—ñ]
Ortho-McNeil, Inc@[J&J Œn—ñ]
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc@[J&J Œn—ñ]
Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, Inc@[J&J Œn—ñ]
OrthoNeutrogena - Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, Inc.‚̃XƒLƒ“ƒPƒAŽ–‹Æ•”–å
Vistakon Pharmaceuticals@[J&JŒn—ñ]
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care,Inc@[J&JŒn—ñ]
Tibotec, Inc.[Division of Ortho Biotech Products, LP]
King Pharmaceuticals Inc.[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
KV Pharmaceutical Company[US]
@¡‹}¬’·‚Ì‹ZpdŽ‹Œ^ƒWƒFƒlƒŠƒbƒNŠé‹Æ
šL-Os šP-Zs
Labopharm Inc[‰Á]
LEO Pharma A/S
Leo Japan
LG Life Science[ŠØ‘]
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc[•Ä]
Lilly
“ú–{ƒC[ƒ‰ƒCƒŠƒŠ[
L'Oreal[•§]
Lundbeck A/S
Madaus AG[“Æ]
Mallinckrodt Group Inc.
 [Tyco International Ltd`ˆã—Ë@Ší]Žq‰ïŽÐ
Meda AB
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Medarex,Inc[BMSŽÐ‚É2009.9.1”ƒŽû]
The Medicines Company[•Ä]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation[US]`ŠO—p–òê–å
MediGene AG[“Æ]
Medimmune
“ú–{ƒƒWƒtƒBƒWƒbƒNƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ
MedPoint Pharmaceuticals Inc[US][‹ŒCarter-Wallace, Inc.]@(2007.8”ƒŽûAŽÐ–¼•ÏX)¨Meda AB
Medtronic,Inc[US]@¡ˆã—Ë@Ší
Menarini[IT]
Merck & Co.
Merck KGaA
ƒƒ‹ƒNДޮ‰ïŽÐ
ƒƒ‹ƒN»–òДޮ‰ïŽÐ[‹Œƒƒ‹ƒNEƒzƒGƒCДޮ‰ïŽÐ]@¨ƒ}ƒCƒ‰ƒ“»–ò
Merck Sante SA[FR]
Lipha SA[FR]
Merck-Serono S.A.[ƒXƒCƒX][‹ŒSerono S.A.]
EMD Serono, Inc[‹ŒSerono USA]
ƒƒ‹ƒNƒZƒ[ƒmДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Merz Pharmaceutische GmbH
MGI Pharma,Inc[•Ä‘]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc[US]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
3M [Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.]
3M Healthcare
3M Pharmaceuticals@(2007)¨•đޖ‹Æ‚ÍGraceway Pharmaceuticals Inc‚Ö/‰¢BŽ–‹Æ‚ÍMeda AB(•ÄMedPointe Pharmaceuticals‚Ìe‰ïŽÐ)‚Ö
Z—FƒXƒŠ[ƒGƒ€Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐ
NeurogesX, Inc[•Ä‘]
Mission Pharmacal Company
Mundipharma AG[]
Mylan Laboratories,Inc.[US]
Mylan Pharmaceuticals,Inc.[US]
Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc[US](•½2006)`Mylan Laboratories,Inc.‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ
ƒ}ƒCƒ‰ƒ“»–ò
DEY, L.P`Mylan Laboratories,Inc.‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ
Novavax ,Inc.[US]
Novartis
ƒmƒoƒ‹ƒeƒBƒX ƒtƒ@[ƒ}Дޮ‰ïŽÐ
Novartis Ophthalmics AG
Novartis Ophthalmics International
Novartis Ophthalmics US
Ciba Vision Corporation[NovartisŒn—ñ]
ƒ`ƒoƒrƒWƒ‡ƒ“[NovartisŒn—ñ]
Speedel Holding Limited[ƒXƒCƒX]/Speedel Pharmaceuticals Inc.(2008.7 Novartis 61.44%)
Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc[•Ä]2009.7 ‹vŒõ»–ò‚É‚æ‚蔃Žû
Novo-Nordisk
ƒmƒ{ƒmƒ‹ƒfƒBƒXƒNƒtƒ@[ƒ}
N.V. Organon -AKZO NovelŽq‰ïŽÐ
“ú–{ƒIƒ‹ƒKƒmƒ“
NPS Pharmaceuticals,Inc[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Nycomed[DE]
Odyssey Pharmaceuticals,Inc.[Pliva•Ä‘Žq‰ïŽÐ]
Onyx Pharmaceuticals 
Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc[US]
Orexo AB[ƒXƒG[ƒfƒ“]
Orion Group[FI]
Orphan Europe sarl[FR]
Orphan Medical, Inc[•Ä‘]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Oscient Pharmaceuticals Corporation[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
  (1994@Collaborative Research Inc¨Genome Therapeutics Corporation‚ɎЖ¼•ÏX
  (2004@Genesoft PharmaceuticalsŽÐ‚ð‹zŽû‡•¹¨Oscient Pharmaceuticals ‚ɎЖ¼•ÏX)
OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[US]`V–òƒoƒCƒIŠé‹Æ
Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
PDL Biopharma Inc.[US][‹ŒProtein Design Labs, Inc.@2006.1ŽÐ–¼•ÏX]
Pfizer
ƒtƒ@ƒCƒU[Дޮ‰ïŽÐ
Pharmaciaš2003.4.16 PfizerŽÐ‚ÉŒo‰c“‡B
ƒtƒ@ƒ‹ƒ}ƒVƒAEƒWƒƒƒpƒ“š2003.8.1 ƒtƒ@ƒBƒU[iŠ”j‚É“‡
Pharming NV[—–]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Pharmion Corporation[•Ä]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Photocure ASA[NO]
Laboratoires Pirre Fabre[•§]
Pliva d.d.[Croatia]
Odyssey Pharmaceuticals,Inc.[Pliva•Ä‘Žq‰ïŽÐ]
POZEN Inc[US]
Praecis Pharmaceuticals,Inc[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Presutti Laboratories, Inc.[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Procter &Gamble
Progenics Pharmaceuticals Inc.[US]
Prometheus Laboratories Inc[US]
Protein Design Labs, Inc.@¨PDL Biopharma Inc.[US]
ProStrakan Group plc[ƒXƒRƒbƒgƒ‰ƒ“ƒh]
PTC Therapeutics,Inc[US]
Purdue Pharma L.P.[US]
Purdue Pharmaceutical Products L.P.@¨@Purdue Pharma L.P.[US]ƒOƒ‹[ƒv
Purdue Products L.P.@¨@Purdue Pharma L.P.[US]ƒOƒ‹[ƒv
The Purdue Frederick Company@¨@Purdue Pharma L.P.[US]ƒOƒ‹[ƒv
QLT Photo Therapeutics[Ca]
Q-Med AB[SW]@¡ƒqƒAƒ‹ƒƒ“Ž_
Recip AB@¨Meda AB
Reckitt Benckiser plc[UK]‰Æ’ë—p•i`‹ŒReckitt & Colman plc
RECORDATI IND.CHIMICA FARM. S.P.A[IT]
Repros Therapeutics Inc.[US]
Roche
“ú–{ƒƒVƒ…¨š’†ŠO»–ò‚É“‡
Genentech, Inc - RocheŽP‰º
Roche Diagnostics
ƒƒVƒ…Eƒ_ƒCƒAƒOƒmƒXƒeƒBƒbƒNƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc[•Ä‘]`Á‰»ŠíН—p–òê–åƒ[ƒJ[
Sanofi-Aventis
Sanofi-Synthelabo@ªŒ»Sanofi-Aventis
Sanofi-Synthelabo[US]
ƒTƒmƒtƒBEƒTƒ“ƒeƒ‰ƒ{EƒWƒƒƒpƒ“
Sanofi Pasteur SA[FR,ƒƒNƒ`ƒ“]
Sanofi Pasteur Inc. -US[US,ƒƒNƒ`ƒ“]
Santhera Pharmaceuticals Ltd.[]
Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[•Ä]
Schering AG
“ú–{ƒVƒF[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Berlex[US] - Schering AG Žq‰ïŽÐ
Intendis GmbH(Schering AG‚ÌŠO—p–òê–åŽq‰ïŽÐ)
Schering-Plough
ƒVƒFƒŠƒ“ƒOEƒvƒ‰ƒE
Schwarz Pharma AG[ƒhƒCƒc]
Sciele Pharma, Inc.
Sepracor Inc.[US]
Serono S.A.Merck-Serono S.A.[ƒXƒCƒX][‹ŒSerono S.A.]
Merck-Serono S.A.[ƒXƒCƒX][‹ŒSerono S.A.]
EMD Serono, Inc[‹ŒSerono USA]
ƒZƒ[ƒmEƒWƒƒƒpƒ“@¨ƒƒ‹ƒNƒZƒ[ƒmДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Servier[FR]
“ú–{ƒZƒ‹ƒ”ƒBƒGДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc[UK]`V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
SkyePharma PLC[‰p]
Smith & Nephew plc[UK]@¡ˆã—û•i
Solvay S.A.
ƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC»–òДޮ‰ïŽÐ
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[Solvay‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ]
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals Inc[US]
Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc[US]
 - Mylan Labs)‚ÆWatson Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚̇•Ù‰ïŽÐ[50:50]
Speedel Holding Limited[ƒXƒCƒX]/Speedel Pharmaceuticals Inc.(2008.7 Novartis 61.44%)
SuperGen, Inc.[•Ä]
Tercica, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.[ƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹]
*Theravance, Inc[•Ä]
Tibotec, Inc.[Division of Ortho Biotech Products, LP]
Tillotts Pharma AG[SZ]`Á‰»Ší•a–òê–åƒ[ƒJ[
Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc 
Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.(TKT)[US]@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Trimeris
Tyco International Ltd`ˆã—Ë@Ší
Tyco Healthcare@¨Covidien plc[ƒAƒCƒ‹ƒ‰ƒ“ƒh]
Mallinckrodt Group Inc.
ƒRƒ”ƒBƒfƒBƒGƒ“ ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ[‹Œƒ^ƒCƒRƒwƒ‹ƒXƒPƒAEƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ]
“ú–{ƒRƒ”ƒBƒfƒBƒGƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ[‹Œ“ú–{ƒVƒƒ[ƒEƒbƒhДޮ‰ïŽÐ]
UCB
ƒ†[ƒV[ƒr[ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[Solvay‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ]
United Therapeutics Corporation[US]@¡ƒoƒCƒIV–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International[‹ŒICN]
Vanda Pharmaceuticals,Inc
Vernalis Group plc[‰p‘]
VeroScience, LLC[US]
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc[US]
Viatris(‹ŒAsta Medica AG)@¨Meda AB
Vicuron Pharmaceuticals,Inc.[US] ‹ŒVersicor@¡V–òƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[
Viropharma Inc[•Ä]
VIVUS, Inc[US]
Warner Chilcott, Inc.[•Ä‘](‹ŒGalen Holdings Plc¨2004)
Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc
Wyeth
ƒƒCƒXiŠ”j
Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc
XenoPort, Inc
ZLB Behring
[‹Œ]Aventis Behring(2004.5•ÏX)
@¨ see CSL Limited[ƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒA]‚ÌŽP‰º‚É Zentaris GmbH[GE]
¨e‰ïŽÐAEterna Zentaris Inc.[Ca]@¡ƒoƒCƒIˆã–ò ZLBƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒOДޮ‰ïŽÐ
[‹Œ]ƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒX ƒx[ƒŠƒ“ƒO ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ(2004.5•ÏX)
@¨ see CSL Limited[ƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒA]‚ÌŽP‰º‚É
œŠé‹Æî•ñ

œ‹à—Z’¡“dŽqŠJަƒVƒXƒeƒ€iEDINET) - —L‰¿ØŒ”•ñ‘ - ‹à—Z’¡‚ÍuØŒ”Žæˆø–@‚ÉŠî‚­—L‰¿ØŒ”•ñ‘“™‚ÌŠJަ‘—Þ‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚é“dŽqŠJަƒVƒXƒeƒ€v (à–¾)‚ÌŽŽŒ±‰^—pŠúŠÔ‚ðI—¹‚µA •½¬16”N6ŒŽˆÈ~AŠJަ‘—Þ“™‚Ì“dŽq‰»‚ªŒ´‘¥‹`–±‰»iEDINET‚ÖˆÚsj iElectronic Disclosure for Investors' NETworkj ‚Â‚Ü‚èŠ”Ž®ŒöŠJ‚ðs‚¤Šé‹Æ‚É’ño‚ð‹`–±‚¯‚ç‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚éu—L‰¿ØŒ”•ñ‘v‚ȂǂÍA ƒlƒbƒgŒöŠJ‚³‚ê‚邱‚ƂɂȂéB œ•đ،”Œö³ŽæˆøˆÏˆõ‰ï[SEC] FilingsŒŸõ from •đ،”Œö³ŽæˆøˆÏˆõ‰ï[SEC][Securities and Exchange Commission] -SEC Filings & Forms (EDGAR) - Companies for SIC 2834 - Pharmaceutical Preparations[549ŽÐ] - Šé‹Æ–¼‚ȂǂŌŸõ‚µAŠJ‚­‚Æ“–ŠYŠé‹Æ‚̃hƒLƒ…ƒƒ“ƒg‚ª‘å—Ê‚Éo‚Ä‚­‚邪 u—L‰¿ØŒ”•ñ‘v‚ðŒ©‚½‚¢ê‡AAnnual Reports Form 10-K EDGARR is... the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system –¯ŠÔŒŸõƒTƒCƒgšSEC Info[Fran Finnegan & Company]‚à•Ö—˜ œŽQl Biotech's old soldiers[Pharmalicensing.com] (15 November 2005) -ŋ߂̇•¹“®Œü y•ăAƒ{ƒbƒgzƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC‚Ì»–ò•”–唃Žû]V‹»‘Žsê‚̃Cƒ“ƒtƒ‰Šl“¾‚Ö[2009.9.30] yƒf[ƒ^ƒ‚ƒjƒ^[zƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC”ƒŽû‚ŃAƒ{ƒbƒg‚̬’·—¦‚͑啉ü‘P[2009.10.9] 2009.9.3 ‘å“ú–{»–ò‚©SepracorŽÐ‚𔃎û(‘ŠzU.S. $2.6 Billion) - [“ú–{Œê] - [à–¾Ž‘—¿]





¡Abbott


y•ăAƒ{ƒbƒgzƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC‚Ì»–ò•”–唃Žû]V‹»‘Žsê‚̃Cƒ“ƒtƒ‰Šl“¾‚Ö[2009.9.30]
yƒf[ƒ^ƒ‚ƒjƒ^[zƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC”ƒŽû‚ŃAƒ{ƒbƒg‚̬’·—¦‚͑啉ü‘P[2009.10.9]


œŒˆŽZ [Še12ŒŽ––]
($ milllion)2009200820072006200520042003200220012000”õl
ƒ”„ã‚30,764.7
‹Œ25,527.6
25,914.222,476.322,337.8(+13.5)19,680.0(+13.9)17,280.317,684.7(+8.6)16,285.2(+18.5)13,745.9
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v6,235.75,693.84,578.52,042.24,362.33,898.3(+31.1)2,974.03,530.11,894.03,400.6
Œoí—˜‰v7,193.85,856.34,469.62,276.44,619.94,125.6(+21.8)3,387.23,673.41,883.13,816.4
ƒ—˜‰v5,745.84,880.73,606.31,716.83,372.13,235.9(+17.5)2,753.22,793.71,550.42,786.0

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï2,743.72,688.82,505.62,255.21,821.21,696.8(+4.5)1,623.81,561.81,577.61,351.0
Žæ“¾Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï170.097.3-2,014.017.1279.0100.2
]‹Æˆõ”73,00069,00068,00066,66359,735?72,18171,81971,42660,571

¡ƒZƒOƒƒ“ƒg•Ê”„ã‚
œPharmaceutical (a)16,486(-1.3)16,708(+14.2)14,632(+18.0)12,395(-9.5)13,691
‹Œ8,138(+16.1)
11,913
‹Œ7,010
6,0514,2683,759•Ä‘“àˆã–ò•i
@‘“à”„ã‚7,794(-8.3)8,497(+8.9)7,806(+19.2)6,550(-19.5)
@‘Û”„ã‚8,692(+5.8)8,211(+20.3)6,826(+16.8)5,845(+5.3)
œDiagnostic (b)3,578(+0.1)3,575(+13.2)3,158(+11.1)3,979(+5.9)3,756(+11.2)3,3783,0402,8972,929
@‘“à”„ã‚939(+4.4)899(+9.6)820(+2.6)1,356(+7.5)1,252(+11.8)
@‘Û”„ã‚2,639(-1.4)2,676(+14.5)2,338(+14.4)2,633(+5.1)2,504(+10.9)
œNutritional5,284(+7.3)4,924(+12.2)4,388(+1.7)4,313(+9.6)
@‘“à”„ã‚(Ross)2,636(+6.3)2,479(+5.6)2,348(-9.4)2,629(+4.2)
@‘Û”„ã‚2,648(+8.3)2,445(+19.8)2,040(+14.4)1,684(+19.1)
œVascular2,692(+20.1)2,241(+34.7)1,663(+53.8)1,082(+327.7)
@‘“à”„ã‚1,599(+32.7)1,205(+39.6)863(+33.5)647(+359.2)
@‘Û”„ã‚1,093(+5.5)1,036(+29.4)800(+83.9)435(+288.0)
šRoss----2,523(+8.5)2,3262,1362,0882,088
šInternational (a)(b)----6,967(+13.0)6,1665,3215,0364,418
@‘Ûˆã–ò•i----5,164(+12.8)
@‘Û‰h—{Ü----1,803(+13.7)
šTotal Reportable Segments27,44823,84121,76921,63719,10116,54817,26815,972
Other2,725(+31.1)2,0802,073(+12.5)707701579732417313

¡Net Sales30,765(+4.2)29,528(+13.9)25,914(+15.3)22,476(+0.6)22,338(+13.5)19,68017,28017,68516,285
@‘“à”„ã‚14,220(+0.4)14,170(+10.1)12,874(+12.0)11,534(-7.5)12,442(+13.0)
@‘Û”„ã‚16,545(+7.7)15,358(+17.8)13,040(+18.8)10,942(+10.9)9,896(+14.2)

TAP Pharmaceutical3,260(-3.0)
Hospital*------3,0782,9792,778
 (a)2001,2002‚ÍABASFˆã–ò•”–唃Žû(2001)‚É‚æ‚é”’l”½‰f
@(b)2003‚̓hƒ‹Žã‰»‚É‚æ‚éD‰e‹¿A2001-2002‚Í‹­‚¢ƒhƒ‹‚ªˆ«‰e‹¿B

 * 2003.8 Abbott‚Í•a‰@»•i•”–å‚Ì’†ŠjHospira,Inc.(”NŠÔ”„ã‚$2.4 billion)‚Ì•ª—£‚ð
”­•\B@‚¢‚¸‚ê’†Ž~Ž–‹Æ‚Æ‚µ‚Ĉ—B
 * 2006.1.1•t‚¯‚ÅŽ–‹ÆÄ•ÒB@Abbott International‚©‚çAbbott Nutrition International‚𕪉»B
@ Ž–‹Æ•ñ‚Å‚ÍANutritional ProductsŽ–‹Æ‚Æ‚µ‚ÄA‘“à‚ðRoss Products Division,‘ÛAbbott Nutrition International

¡‘•Ê”„ã‚
United States14,45314,,49513,25211,99512,70711,2429,91910,99810,249
Japan1,5901,2491,1111,0541,027987897784748
Germany1,4811,3811,235885992811785721644
The Netherlands1,8011,,7531,2711,061899705556446349
Italy1,1721,089974848806745658572496
Canada902924832762680595526512468
France959977854696657587467
Spain970909731583542513426
United Kingdom779725627517504496397
‚»‚Ì‘¼6,6586,0265,0274,0753,5242,9992,6493,6523,331
Consolidated30,76529,,52825,91422,47622,33819,68017,28017,68516,285
œ”„ã
($ milllion)2009200820072006200520042003200220012000”õl
šPharmaceutical
Humira5,488(+21.4)4,521(+47.6)3,064(+49.9)2,0641,400852280---[adalimumab]ƒŠƒEƒ}ƒ`
@•Ä‘2,519(+11.7)2,255(+36.6)1,651(+40.4)1,176(+38.4)849(+53.2)555(+125.6)246(-)
@ŠCŠO2,969(+31.0)2,266(+60.4)1,413(+62.9)868(+57.6)551(+85.4)297(-)34(-)
Mobic@•Ä‘‚Ì‚Ý---1232(+107.8)593(+85.1)320(+40.0)229(40.1)163(-)-[Meloxicam]Á‰Š’Á’É
Depakote425(-68.8)1,364(-13.4)1,575(+20.4)1,3081,0961,027927898869(+12.0)39(+1.9)[divalproex sodium]R‚Ä‚ñ‚©‚ñÜ
@•Ä‘331(-73.8)1,262(-14.8)1,480(+20.3)1,230(+18.5)1,037(+6.1)978(+10.4)886(+2.9)861(-0.9)
@ŠCŠO94(-7.5)102(+7.4)95(+21.7)78(+24.8)59(+20.3)49(+18.2)41(+12.3)37(-3.6)
Clarithromycin651(-10.1)724(-11.2)8161,0651,1831,2211,102537(-7.2)622(-6.3)[Biaxin,Biaxin XL, Klacid, Klaricid]R¶•¨Ž¿
@•Ä‘-14(-)36(-75.9)151(-50.5)306(-33.2)458(-15.0)538(+10.5)487(-9.2)
@ŠCŠO-637(-7.4)688(+3.5)665(-12.5)759(+4.8)725(+6.1)683(+11.0)615(-1.0)
Kaletra1,366(-7.3)1,474(+11.2)1,325(+16.7)1,1351,005896752551210(-)83(-)[lopinavir/ritonavir]HIV
@•Ä‘446(-12.9)513(-4.7)538(+5.0)512(+22.0)420(+5.5)398(+3.9)383(+20.6)318(51.3)
@ŠCŠO920(-4.3)961(+22.1)787(+26.3)623(+6.5)585(+17.6)498(+35.0)369(+58.5)233(179.4)
TriCor/Trilipix@•Ä‘‚Ì‚Ý1,337(-0.3)1,341(+10.1)1,218(+16.2)1,048(+13.1)927(+18.9)779(+37.6)566(+40.6)403(52.9)264(+74.1)-[fenofibrate]‚މŒŒÇ
Ultane/Sevorane-787(+3.7)759(-5.0)799874774674567192(+9.8)309(+10.9)[Sevoflurane]‘Sg–ƒŒÜ
@•Ä‘-193(-3.4)200(-23.4)260(-22.5)336(+16.0)290(+12.7)257(+16.3)221(15.0)
@ŠCŠO-594(+6.2)559(+3.9)539(+0.2)538(+11.1)484(+15.9)417(+20.6)346(11.9)
Niaspan[•Ä‘]855(+8.8)786(+19.4)658(-)--[Niacin]Ž‰Ž¿’ቺÜ;2006Q4 Kos Pharmaceuticals Inc”ƒŽû‚É”º‚¤
Synthroid502(-4.3)524(-1.6)533(-0.3)534554689609520445(-)22(-)[levothyroxine sodium]bó‘B
@•Ä‘415(-4.5)435(-5.0)458(-2.7)470(-5.7)498(-21.7)637(+12.8)565(+15.5)489(+9.9)
@ŠCŠO97(-3.1)89(+19.2)75(+17.2)64(+14.5)56(+7.8)52(+16.6)44(+42.9)31(+42.9)
Omnicef@•Ä‘‚Ì‚Ý--235637(+28.6)495(+53.6)323(+30.5)247(+58.0)157(74.7)90(109.2)-[cefdinir]2007ƒWƒFƒlƒŠƒbƒN‹£‡
Leuprolide@ŠCŠO‚Ì‚Ý800(+22.8)651-230(+4.6)219(+11.0)198(+8.2)183(+6.3)105(13.6)163(+6.2)[Lupron,Lucrin]
@•Ä‘540(+43.2)377
@ŠCŠO260(-5.3)274
Lansoprazole@ŠCŠO‚Ì‚Ý651(-)-173(+12.3)154(+8.0)142(+7.8)132(+25.4)172(5.6)93(+18.0)[Prevacid,Ogastro]
@•Ä‘377(-)
@ŠCŠO274(+6.5)
Flomax---(B-I‚Ƃ̕¹”̉ðÁ04.8)724575[tamsulosin HCl]
@•Ä‘-----689(+24.7)553(34.6)411(+47.7)
@ŠCŠO-----35(+54.9)22(+44.2)16(+60.0)
Meridia/Reductil------272[sibutramine]
@•Ä‘------75(-10.7)84(-)
@ŠCŠO------197(61.8)118(-)
šMedical Products Group
Pediatric Nutr.2,849(+7.8)2,642(+13.6)2,326(+14.8)2,0261,7951,7411,6201,490[]
@•Ä‘1,306(+3.0)1,268(+2.8)1,233(+9.4)1,128(+2.7)1097(-4.3)1146(+4.8)1093(+9.0)1004(-3.6)1041(-0.1)
@ŠCŠO1,543(+12.3)1,374(+25.7)1,093(+21.6)898(+28.7)698(+17.3)595(+13.0)527(+8.4)486(1.1)480(+8.5)
Adult Nutritionals2,375(+6.4)2,232(+10.3)2,024(+7.6)1,8821,7921,5971,4001,366[]
@•Ä‘1,269(+9.2)1,162(+7.8)1,077(+1.9)1,097(+1.9)1050(+12.4)934(+15.5)809(-3.5)838(0.7)833(+3.8)
@ŠCŠO1,106(+3.3)1,070(+13.0)947(+14.9)785(+9.7)742(+11.5)663(+12.1)591(+11.9)528(3.9)508(+0.2)
Diabetes Care1,242(-8.2)1,353(+8.4)1,249(+9.9)1,1361,067791(+46.1)541494[]
@•Ä‘498(-11.0)559(+1.1)553(+1.3)547(+4.8)522(+38.1)378(+84.8)204(-0.4)205(8.1)190(+0.5)
@ŠCŠO744(-6.3)794(+14.2)696(+18.0)589(+8.2)545(+31.8)413(+22.7)337(+16.8)289(8.8)265(+7.8)
Coronary Stents1,618(+35.0)1,199(+78.4)672(-)-
@•Ä‘1,029(+53.8)669(+118.5)306(-)-
@ŠCŠO589(+11.3)530(+44.8)366(-)-
Core Laboratory Diagnostics3,027(-2.3)
@•Ä‘605(-1.9)
@ŠCŠO2,422(-2.4)
Medical Optics890(-)-
@•Ä‘337(-)-
@ŠCŠO553(-)-
Molecular Diagnostics316(+18.3)
@•Ä‘150(+23.5)
@ŠCŠO166(+14.0)
Other Coronary-642(+6.5)604(+32.5)
@•Ä‘-298(-0.5)300(+13.0)
@ŠCŠO-344(+13.4)304(+59.8)
Endovascular-400(+3.1)388(+11.9)
@•Ä‘-238(-7.6)257(+0.8)
@ŠCŠO-162(+24.1)130(+42.9)
Vascular Devices----253221(+19.3)185(+44.7)205(33.3)-[]
@•Ä‘----141(+11.7)221(+19.3)185(+44.7)205(33.3)-
@ŠCŠO----112(+18.8)----
šTAP Pharm@(”ñ˜AŒ‹)
Prevacid@•Ä‘‚Ì‚Ý-[1-4ŒŽ]6492,2752,600(+4.0)2,5012,592(-18.7)3,190(+1.0)3,157(7.0)2,951(+7.7)2,739[Lansoprazole]’×á‡
Lupron@•Ä‘‚Ì‚Ý-[1-4ŒŽ]182645662(-5.2)699770(-2.2)788(-10.1)876(5.2)833(+4.2)799[Leuprolide]‘O—§‘BŠà
from- ABBOTT REPORTS 15.5 PERCENT SALES INCREASE IN THE FOURTH QUARTER; 13.9 PERCENT INCREASE FOR 2004[2005.1.18] from - Abbott Reports 14.3 Percent Sales Increase in the Fourth Quarter; 11.3 Percent Increase for 2003[2004.1.16] œKos Pharmaceuticals, Inc 2006.11.5 Abbott‚Ƈ•¹Œ_–ñ’÷Œ‹B
($million)2006Q1+Q22005200420032002200120001999”õl
”„ã‚170.8+223.7746.197495.545293.907172.69391.44760.17436.340[]
Advicor142.6 w/+34.9116.0108.267.427.1[niacin+losvastatin]
Niaspan+131.0435.2319.1226.5145.6[niacin]
Azmacort22.9+26.5103.268.3-[]2004.3.8 Aventis‚©‚碊E“ÆèŒ Šl“¾
Teveten,HCT+5.5
31.6 w/+31.3 w/
22.1--[eprosartan]”Ì”„ŠJŽn2005.5;from Bioval
Cardizem LA+25.869.7--[diltiazem]”Ì”„ŠJŽn2005.5;from Bioval
[]
Teveten(R) (eprosartan mesylate) and Teveten HCT (eprosartan mesylate/hydrochlorothiazide) Cardizem(R) LA (diltiazem hydrochloride) ‚̕đ”Ì”„Œ ‚ðKos Life Sciences(KLS; KosŽq‰ïŽÐ)‚ª Biovail Corporation ‚©‚çŠl“¾B2005.5.2‚ÉŒ_–ñ‚µ2005.5‚©‚糌pB šNiaspan Kos ‚ª1997.9•Ä‘”Ì”„ŠJŽnB ‰¢B‚Å‚ÍKos‚̃p[ƒgƒi[‚Æ‚µ‚ÄMerck KGaA‚ª2003.11.3‚ÉNiaspan‰p‘”­”„A2004.1 ‚P‚R‚̉¢B”‘‚̳”FŽæ“¾B Kos‚Í2003.11.4 Niaspan and Advicor‚̕đ‚Ì‹¤“¯”Ì”„Œ_–ñ‚ð •“c–ò•i‚ÆŒ_–ñB Kos‚Í2003.8.20 Niaspan and Advicor‚̃Jƒiƒ_‚Ì‹¤“¯”Ì”„Œ_–ñ‚ðOryx Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚ÆŒ_–ñ‚µA @@@Oryx‚Í2003.12‚ɳ”F\¿B šAdvicor [niacin+losvastatin] FDA³”F2001.12.17 by KosA•Ä‘”­”„2002.1.28 Kos‚Í2003.11.4 Niaspan and Advicor‚̕đ‚Ì‹¤“¯”Ì”„Œ_–ñ‚ð •“c–ò•i‚ÆŒ_–ñB Kos‚Í2003.8.20 Niaspan and Advicor‚̃Jƒiƒ_‚Ì‹¤“¯”Ì”„Œ_–ñ‚ðOryx Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚ÆŒ_–ñ‚µA @@@Oryx‚Í2003.12‚ɳ”F\¿B
œAbbott

œPress release Abbott Reports Double-Digit Sales and Ongoing Earnings Growth in Fourth Quarter; Issues Ongoing Earnings Outlook for 2011[2011.1.26] Abbott Reports Double-Digit Sales and Earnings Growth in Fourth Quarter; Issues Strong Earnings Outlook for 2010[2010.1.27] Abbott Reports Double-Digit Sales and Earnings Growth in Fourth Quarter; Issues Strong Earnings Outlook for 2010[2009.1.27] Abbott Reports 16.1 Percent Sales Growth in Fourth Quarter[2008.1.23] œProducts ¡Investor Relations œSEC Filings 10-K[2011.2.18] - [pdf] - [doc] 10-K[2010.2.19] - [pdf,252p] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K[2009.2.20] - [pdf,318p] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K[2008.2.19] - [pdf,137p] 10-K[2007.2.23] - [pdf,250] 10-K[2006.2.22] - [pdf] - [xls] 10-K[02/25/04] œIR Fact Book œAnnual Report ---Annual Report ‚ɂͻ•iŒÂ•Ê‚âOperation review‚Í‚ ‚邪”„‚èã‚°‚̃f[ƒ^‹LÚ‚È‚µ - Abbott Reports Strong Fourth-Quarter Results and Record Operating Cash Flow in 2006 [2007.1.24] - 2006 Annual Report - [pdf] - Abbott Reports Record Sales, Earnings and Cash Flow in 2005[2006.1.25] šŽ¾•aƒTƒCƒg Pediatric Health Men's Health Women's Health Diabetes HIV Horizon Respiratory Infections Pain Management Animal Health œAbbott Lab Online - http://www.rxabbott.com/
œƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“

- http://www.abbott.co.jp 2003”N‚QŒŽ‚P“úAƒ_ƒCƒiƒ{ƒbƒg(Š”)‚Æ–k—¤»–ò(Š”)‚ª‡•¹‚µAƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“(Š”)Ý—§ ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐiƒ_ƒCƒiƒ{ƒbƒgiŠ”j‚Æ–k—¤»–òiŠ”j‚ª‡•¹j •Ä‘ƒAƒ{ƒbƒgAƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC»–ò‚Ì”ƒŽû‚ðŠ®—¹[2010.2.17] ƒ\ƒ‹ƒxƒC»–òiŠ”j ŽÐ–¼•ÏX‚Ì‚¨’m‚点[2010.4.12] ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“AƒAƒ{ƒbƒg»–ò‡•¹‚ðŠ®—¹[2011.4.1] - ‡•¹Š®—¹‚É”º‚¢AƒAƒ{ƒbƒg»–ò‚̋Ɩ±‹’“_‚ð”pŽ~‚µAƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“‚Ɉړ]B ‚Ü‚½ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg»–ò‚Ì»•iA‹Æ–±‚Í‚·‚ׂăAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“‚ɳŒp‚³‚ê‚Ü‚·B œˆã—Ê֌WŽÒ‚ÌŠF—l šˆã—×pˆã–ò•i šŒŒ“œ‘ª’èŠí œƒvƒŒƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“(Š”)A4ŒŽ‚©‚çˆã—×pˆã–ò•i‚ÌŽ©ŽÐ”Ì”„‚ðŠJŽn[2006.3.31] - 1953”NAƒAƒ{ƒbƒgi•Ä‘j‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ‚Å‚ ‚éƒAƒ{ƒbƒgƒWƒƒƒpƒ“@i‹Œƒ_ƒCƒiƒ{ƒbƒg(Š” )j‚Æ‘å“ú–{Z—F»–òДޮ‰ïŽÐi‹Œ‘å“ú–{»–ò(Š”)j‚Ƃ̊ԂÅAƒAƒ{ƒbƒg»•i‚Ì‘“à‚É‚¨ ‚¯‚é‘‘ã—“XŒ_–ñ‚ª’÷Œ‹‚³‚êA‹Œ‘å“ú–{»–ò‚ªƒAƒ{ƒbƒg»•i‚̔̔„‚ðŽn‚߂܂µ‚½B@—¼ŽÐ ‚̔̔„’ñŒgŒ_–ñ‚ÍA2006”N3ŒŽ31“ú‚ð‚à‚Á‚ÄŒ_–ñŠúŠÔ–ž—¹‚É‚æ‚èIŒ‹‚¢‚½‚µ‚Ü‚·B ƒAƒ{ƒbƒg ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“(Š”)‚Æ‘å“ú–{Z—F»–ò(Š”)”Ì”„’ñŒgŒ_–ñ‚ð–ž—¹[2006.3.27]
œTap Pharmaceutical Products Inc.[US]

- http://www.tap.com/ 1977”NAbbott Laboratories‚Æ•“c–ò•iH‹Æ‚̇•Ù‰ïŽÐ‚Æ‚µ‚ÄÝ—§B 2008.5.1 •“c–ò•i‚Æ•ÄAbbott‚͇•ÙŽ–‹ÆTAP‚ðI—¹B 2008.7.1 Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.[TPNA]‹y‚ÑTakeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc[TGRD]‚ªTap Pharmaceutical Products Inc.‚Ƈ•¹ ]‹Æˆõ”3,000l(2006––)A”NŠÔ”„ã(2006) $3,362 Million œProducts Prevacid œPrescribing Information œDiseases & Conditions
($ 000)2008/1-42007200620052004200320022001”õl
”„ã‚853,0933,001,7383,362,6723,259,8503,361,6344,034,000
”Ì”„Œ´‰¿228,747719,976835,834883,404990,417
‘e—˜‰v2,526,8382,376,4462,371,217
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v355,8611,560,6201,512,3261,373,9931,176,389
Œoí—˜‰v356,1011,564,4881,523,3261,379,3311,181,052
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v237,994996,030951,621882,772749,969
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï54,381161,013245,476219,412167,625
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]2,9003,0003,475

Prevacid•Ä‘649,3032,275,2932,599,8862,501,052[Lansoprazole]’×á‡
Lupron•Ä‘182,042645,450662,374698,806[Leuprolide]‘O—§‘BŠà







¡Abiogen Pharma S.p.A[ˆÉ]

 - http://www.abiogen.it/english/home.asp

1997”N@‘n—§@Istituto Gentili S.p.A‚ª•ăƒ‹ƒNŽÐ‚É‚æ‚锃ŽûŽžA“¯ŽÐ‘n—§ŽÒ‚Ì‘·‚ªƒXƒsƒ“ƒAƒEƒg


œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
(Eur 000)2007200620052004200320022001
”„ã‚65,36472,190.5869,130.3169,410.20

“àPharma47,820[73.15%]57,136.1853,996.3649,290.6042,20036,30034,400
@Manufacturing12,880[19.72%]11,846.8412,277.7915,207.9012,60010,70010,700
@Royalty&Down payment4,660[7.13%]3,207.561,856.164,911.7012,0007,60013,950

EBITDA7,6408,961
EBIT2,687.282,814.942,672.57
ƒ—˜‰v(639.24)(1,017.69)(478.72)
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]369
(2007 ”„ã‹àŠz”ä) œ‘eé ÇENSAIDS 47.75%@ŒÄ‹zŠíŒn 12.66%@“œ”A•a 18.63%@”畆‰È޾г 9.23%@‚»‚Ì‘¼ 11.73%@
œAbiogen Pharma S.p.A[ˆÉ]

¡Pharma œAbiogen Pharma's products @Nerixia (neridronic acid sodium) ¡R & D œLicensing In
»•i–¼–òŒøƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXæ”õl
alendronate(Alendros)œ‘eé Ç•ÄMerck & Co
Lyophilised bacterial lysates(Broncho Munal)O.M.
Calcium dobesilate(Doxium/Doxiproct Plus)O.M.
E.Coli Bacteria exts(Uro Munal)O.M.
diacerein(Fisiodar)Tran Bussan
aceclofenac(Gladio)NSAIDs¼Almirall Prodesfarma
tecalcitol(Vellutan)’él
octopirox/sebomina/Norgel(Kourilles)ˆÉFarmaka
clotiazepam(Tienor)ˆÉFarmaka
lyophilised collagene(Condress)ˆÉEuroresearch
xibornol(Bornilene)ˆÉEuphar
clarithromycin(Soriclar)ƒ}ƒNƒƒ‰ƒCƒhR¶•¨Ž¿ˆÉAbbott
œLicensing Out
»•i–¼–òŒøƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXæ’nˆæ
clodronateœ‘eé ÇˆÉSPAAˆÉFidiaˆÉe
‰pBeacon Pharmaceuticals‰¢B
ƒMƒŠƒVƒƒEƒLƒvƒƒXEƒgƒ‹ƒRSamaritan Pharmaceuticals‰¢B
‰ÁOryx Pharmaceuticals InƒJƒiƒ_
E Vitamin 400 IUˆÉBraccoˆÉ
glibenclamide+metformin“œ”A•aˆÉFornier Pharma/Solvay PharmaˆÉ
•§Merck Sante‰¢B
•ÄBMS•Ä‘
ƒƒLƒVƒRProductos RocheƒƒLƒVƒR
tacalcitolˆÉIDI FarmaceuticiˆÉ
17ƒÀ-estradiolˆÉSolvay PharmaˆÉ
œPipeline /2008.8.3
»•i–¼¬•ª–òŒø’iŠK”õl
CL-I.A.clodronate•ÏŒ`«ŠÖßÇP3
Nerixianeridronateœ‘eé ÇEAlgodistrophyP3
BTG1640isoxazoline—U“±‘Ì•sˆÀÇEƒpƒjƒbƒNáŠQP2
TALL 104Human cytotoxic cell lineŠàP1
CombotoxMOAB-Anti-CD19 Toxin
MOAB-Anti-CD22 Toxin
”ñƒzƒWƒLƒ“ƒŠƒ“ƒpŽîP1
IMTOX 22MOAB-Anti-CD22 Toxin”ñƒzƒWƒLƒ“ƒŠƒ“ƒpŽîP1
¡Manufacturing Žó‘õ‰ÁH‚È‚Ç ¡ƒvƒŒƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX(‚Ì‘ã‚í‚è)

Abiogen Pharma starts a clinical phase II in Panic Disorders (21st May 2008)
- ABIO 08/01‚̃pƒjƒbƒNáŠQP2ŽŽŒ±‚ðŠJŽnB@
Abiogen starts a Phase II in cancer with its new cell-therapy.(20th Nov 2006)
- ABIO 05/01 ‚ÌP2ŽŽŒ±ŽÀŽ{‚ð³”F‚³‚ꂽB@–{܂َ͈í×–E—Ö@܂Ŗ«œ‘«”’ŒŒ•a‚ȂǂɗLŒø‚Æ‚³‚ê‚éB
Abiogen Pharma's new anti-anxiety drug starts a clinical phase II in Generalized Anxiety Disorders in Vienna.(1st Jul 2006)
- ABIO 08/01‚ÌGAD‚ÌP2ŽŽŒ±‚ðŠJŽnB
Abiogen Pharma / Oryx Pharmaceutical: a license agreement for Disodium Clodronate(20th Jun 2005)
-
Abiogen Pharma's new cell therapy starts a clinical phase I-II in Peritoneal Carcinosis(14th Apr 2005)
-
A NEW VAGINAL AND SURGERY DOUCHE(6th Apr 2004)
-
EMEA grants to Abiogen Pharma the Orphan Drug status for a new compound in myelofibosis indication.(8th Oct 2003)
- OGP (10-14)L (H-Tyrosine-Glycine- Phenilalanine-Glycine-Glycine-OH) ‚̃I[ƒtƒ@ƒ“\¿‚ðEMEA‚Í2003.9.10‚ɳ”F‚µ‚½B@“K‰ž‚Íchronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF)–«Œ´”­«œ‘üˆÛÇ.
Abiogen Pharma Spa: authorized Phase I for an OGP drug(5th Dec 2002)
-
Clodronate for the treatment of Osteoarthritis: positive results for Abiogen Pharma.(2nd Oct 2002)
-
New trends in the research of new vaccines for Hepatitis C and Tetanus on a biotechnological basis in Italy.(26th Jun 2002)
-
The first drug Worldwide for Osteogenesis Imperfecta, the "illness of bones of crystal", developed and registered in Italy.(25th Jun 2002)
- ¢ŠE‰‚ÌœŒ`¬•s‘SŽ¡—ÖòNeridronate‚ª³”F‚³‚ꂽB@œÜ‚Æ‹ê’É‚ðƒhƒ‰ƒXƒ`ƒbƒN‚ÉŒyŒ¸B












¡Abraxis BioScience Inc.

 - http://www.abraxisbio.com/; (Nasdaq: ABII) –{ŽÐLos Angeles, California
2005.11.27 ABI‚ÆAPP‚̇•¹Œð‚ɓü‚èA2006.4.18‚ɇ•¹Š®—¹AAbraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis)‚ƂȂÁ‚½B B
2007.7.2 Abraxis BioScience (Nasdaq: ABBI)‚ÍA•a‰@Œü‚¯ˆã–ò•i’†S‚ÉAbraxis Pharmaceutical Products(APP)‚𕪗£B
2007.11.13 Žc‚Á‚½ABBI‚ÍAbraxis Oncology and Abraxis ResearchŽ–‹Æ‚ðŠÜ‚Ý
;¨APP Pharmaceuticals Inc[APPX¨APCVZ]‚ɎЖ¼•ÏXB
2008.7.6   APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚ÍFresenius SE‚É”ƒŽûŠ®—¹[09.10.9] NASDAQ=APCVZ
2009.1     VÝŽq‰ïŽÐAbraxis Health Inc‚ðƒXƒsƒ“ƒIƒt



œ‹ŒAmerican BioScience, Inc.[ABI,ABS]
1994.6  Ý—§B;  Santa Monica, CA ; ”ñãê
‹ŒŽÐ–¼@VivoRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc
ˆö‚݂Ɍ’NH•iEˆê”Ê–ò”Ì”„‚ÌAmerican BioScience, Inc. - http://www.americanbiosciences.com/
‚Í•Ê‚ÌŠé‹ÆB


ƒAƒXƒeƒ‰ƒX»–ò‚ªˆê•”Ž‘–{ŽQ‰Á‚µ‚Ä‚¨‚èA“ú–{‚ł̋‘”ÛŒ ‚ð•Û—LB[1998.6.9]

œ‹ŒAmerican Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (APP)
 - http://www.appdrugs.com/; American BioScience, Inc.‚ÌŽq‰ïŽÐ(67.9%)B 
   RƒKƒ“Ü‚ÆRŠ´õ–ò‚Ì’ŽËÜ‚Éd“_B NASDAQ:  APPX
1996      ƒWƒFƒlƒŠƒbƒNˆã–òŽ–‹ÆŠJŽn
1998.6@@Fujisawa USA,Inc.‚̃WƒFƒlƒŠƒbƒN’ŽË–òŽ–‹Æ‚𔃎ûB
We are a Delaware corporation that was formed in 2001 as successor to a California corporation formed in 1996.
2003ŒãŠú@Abraxis Oncology division Ý—§
2005.12–– American BioScience, Inc.‚Í“–ŽÐДޮ‚Ì66.2%‚ð•Û—LB
2005.11.27 ABI‚ÆAPP‚̇•¹Œð‚ɓü‚èA2006.4.18‚ɇ•¹Š®—¹AAbraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis)‚ƂȂÁ‚½B B
Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis) -http://www.abraxisbio.com/index.htm
At June 30, 2006, we had the following wholly owned subsidiaries, Pharmaceutical Partners of Canada, In
c., Pharmacetical Partners Switzerland, GmbH, Puerto Rico, LLP, VivoRx AutoImmune, Inc., Chicago BioSci
ence, LLC and Transplant Research Institute our majority owned subsidiary, Resuscitation Technologies, 
LLC and our investment in Drug Source Company, LLC, which is accounted for using the equity method



œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($000)200820072006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚345,309333,686
‹Œ647,674
182,287
‹Œ583,201
‹Œ765,488(+47)
135,,675
‹Œ385,082
‹Œ520,757(+29)
237
‹Œ405,010
‹Œ405,247
351,315
‹Œ351,744
283,616192,029165,495
‘e—˜‰v306,241299,236
‹Œ315,328
161,104
‹Œ295,122
‹Œ457,976
111,609
‹Œ181,646
‹Œ293,522
(103)
‹Œ213,236
‹Œ212,993
189,742
‹Œ190,052
141,77870,41059,908
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v(292,332)(54,356)
‹Œ160,160
(146,173)
‹Œ140,797
‹Œ3,756
(5,908)
‹Œ86,270
‹Œ87,328
(74,271)
‹Œ136,819
‹Œ64,949
120,621
‹Œ87,921
50,58925,382-12,246
Œoí—˜‰v(278,709)(49,556)
‹Œ137,180
(150,515)
‹Œ123,785
‹Œ(17,598)
(12,184)
‹Œ60,865
‹Œ55,646
(76,301)
‹Œ120,466
‹Œ46,566
101,539
‹Œ67,261
35,57822,167(13,797)
ƒ—˜‰v(276,771)(41,604)
‹Œ34,358
(124,551)
‹Œ(46,897)
(12,662)
‹Œ17,657
(76,301)
‹Œ18,221
26,35318,64712,628-8,759

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï103,59088,717
‹Œ46,497
63,073
‹Œ27,787
‹Œ96,891
50,121
‹Œ18,454
‹Œ68,896
34,896
‹Œ16,707
‹Œ51,462
17,422
‹Œ39,269
35,34413,79013,016
Žæ“¾Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï13,900-83,447--
]‹Æˆõ”7341,3751,8641,4881,381
@@Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­310722409273(Ph.D.=35)
@@•iŽ¿ŠÇ—315376282301
@@»‘¢•”–å160779807798711
@@”Ì”„‰c‹Æ13661247207175
@@Ž––±ŠÇ—128148194109121
*2003-2006‚Ì‹Œƒf[ƒ^‚Í2007.7.2 Abraxis BioScience (Nasdaq: ABBI)‚ÍA•a‰@Œü‚¯ˆã–ò •i’†S‚ÉAbraxis Pharmaceutical Products(APP)‚Ì•ª—£ˆÈ‘O‚̃f[ƒ^B œŽ–‹Æ•Ê”„ã‚
($000)2008200720062005200420032002”õl

Critical care-382,772302,244
‹Œ303,485(+86)
163,581(-8)178,242(+5)169,849(+25)135,370oxytocin,heparin
Anti-infective-193,704213,489(+26)169,818(+36)125,052(+31)95,581(+29)74,082
Oncology-55,30857,872
‹Œ57,983(+14)
51,084(-47)95,866(+18)81,049(+32)61,204
Žó‘õ»‘¢‘¼-15,5909,595
‹Œ9,485(-)
599(-90)5,850(+21)4,836(-29)6,818

ƒ”„ã‚-647,374583,201
‹Œ584,442(+52)
385,082(-5)405,010(+15)351,315(+27)277,474
Abraxane335,631324,692174,906(+31)133,731(-)---[Paclitaxel-albumin]“ûŠà;•Ä‘”­”„2005.2.7
Research Revenue9,6788,9947,381
‹Œ6,140(+216)
1,944(+720)237
‘Žû“ü345,309333,686
‹Œ647,374
182,287
‹Œ765,488(+47)
135,675
‹Œ520,757(+29)
237
‹Œ405,247
351,744283,616
[ABRAXANE] 2001.11 ‹ŒAmerican BioScience[ABI]‚©‚ç–k•Ă̔̔„Œ A‘S¢ŠE»‘¢Œ ‚ðŽæ“¾Œ_–ñB - 2004”N•Ä‘paclitaxelŽsê‹K–͂͂P‰­ƒhƒ‹(IMS) 2005.1.7 FDA³”FA•Ä‘”­”„‚Í2005.2.7B 2005.5.27 “ú–{‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚Ä‘å–Q–ò•i‚Ƀ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX 2006.4.26 AstraZeneca‚ƕđ‚Å‹¤“¯”Ì”„B@ˆö‚Ý‚ÉAbraxis Oncology(]‹Æˆõ280lA‚¤‚¿MR 169l)
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: On May 27, 2005, we entered into a license agreement with Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. under which we granted to Taiho the exclusive rights to market and sell Abraxane(R) in Japan. We, along with Taiho, established a joint steering committee to oversee the development of AbraxaneR in Japan for the treatment of breast, lung and gastric cancer and other solid tumors. Under this license agreement, Taiho paid us a non-refundable, upfront payment and will make additional payments to us upon achievement of various clinical, regulatory and sales milestones, with total potential payments in excess of $50.0 million. In addition, we will receive royalties from Taiho based on net sales under the license agreement.

[Competition 2006]

We believe that Abraxane(R) competes, directly or indirectly, with the primary taxanes in the market place, including Bristol-Myers Squibb's Taxol(R) and its generic equivalents, Sanofi-Aventis' Taxotere(R) and other cancer therapies. Many pharmaceutical companies have developed and are marketing, or are developing, alternative formulations of paclitaxel and other cancer therapies that may compete directly or indirectly with Abraxane(R).



œAbraxis BioScience Inc.

œProducts šAbraxane šProduct Catalog œResearch šNDA pipeline œIR/Media šPress Releases Abraxis BioScience Reports 2008 Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Financial Results[2009.3.3] Abraxis BioScience Reports Record Revenue of $765 Million in 2006 Versus $521 Million for 2005[2007.2.26] American BioScience Licenses ABRAXANE(TM) to Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., One of the Largest Oncology Companies in Japan[2005.11.15] šSEC Filings 10-K Annual report[2009.3.6] - [pdf,119P] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K Annual report[2008.3.17] - [pdf,528p] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K Annual report[2007.3.1] - [pdf] 10-K Annual report[2006.3.10] - [pdf]







¡ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc[US]

 - 1997.1‘n—§; (Nasdaq: ACAD); ‘n–ò‹Zp‚ð—p‚¢A_ŒoŒnˆã–òŠJ”­‚ðs‚¤ƒoƒCƒIŠé‹ÆB
Our headquarters and biology research facilities are located in San Diego, Calif
ornia, and our chemistry research facility is located in Malmo, Sweden
]‹Æˆõ”=101 (2004.12––)‚¤‚¿Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­87lB


¡‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ@(12ŒŽ––)
($000)@@@    2004     2003     2002     2001     2000
Žû“ü
@’ñŒg“™‚É‚æ‚é   4,529    4,953    3,655    3,714    4,193
@‘¼‚ÌŒ¤‹†Žû“ü      75    2,425    2,621        -      119
@@@Œv         4,604    7,378    6,276    3,714    4,312
‰c‹ÆŽxo
@Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­      23,454   16,935   14,921   13,090    9,728
@ˆê”ÊŠÇ—”ï     4,889    2,791    2,818    3,756    2,999
@ДޮžŠÒ       2,356    1,392    1,163    2,147    2,854
@@Œv          30,699   21,118   18,902   18,993   15,581
     
‰c‹Æ‘¹Ž¸       (26,095) (13,740) (12,626) (15,279) (11,269) 
Žó“ü—˜‘§           607      360      420    1,494    1,516
Žx•¥—˜‘§          (429)    (712)    (662)    (621)    (441) 
ƒ‘¹Ž¸@@     (25,917) (14,092) (12,868) (14,406) (10,194) 


œŠJ”­’iŠK‚̈ã–ò
ACP-103@@@@ P2 ƒp[ƒLƒ“ƒ\ƒ“•aŽ¡—Öò‚É‚æ‚é¸_Çó‚ÌŽ¡—Ã
ACP-103@@@@ P2 “‡Ž¸’²Ç‚Ì•¹—p—Ö@
ACP-104@@@@ P2 “‡Ž¸’²Ç‚ÌŽ¡—Ã; N-Desmethylclozapine
 *Šù’m•¨Ž¿‚Ì‚½‚ß•¨Ž‘“Á‹–‚Ì‘ÎۂƂ͂Ȃç‚È‚¢‚Ì‚ÅA—p“r“Á‹–‚ð\¿’†B
AGN-XX & AGN-YY P1 _Œoˆö«áu’É
AC-262271       ‘O—Õ°@—Γàá

œ’ñŒg
[Allergan] 2003.3 Šá‰È—pV–òŠJ”­‚Å‚R”NŠÔŒ_–ñ
@$3.9 million(2004) and $2.7 million(2003)Žó—Ì
@“–‰1997.9 _Œoˆö«áu’É‹y‚ÑŠá‰È—p–ò‚ÌV–ò‘n»‚Å’ñŒgŒ_–ñB
@1999.7 —ΓàᎡ—ÖòŠJ”­‚Å’ñŒgB
[The Stanley Medical Research Institute, or SMRI] 2004.5  ‚R”NŒ_–ñ
@“‡Ž¸’²Ç‚ÌV–òŠJ”­
[Aventis] 2002.7@
[Amgen]   2001.12 
  small molecule drugs ‚Ì‘n–ò


œACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc

¡Investors œSEC Filings Annual Filings 10-K[2005.3.18] - [pdf][84p] œAnnual Reports œPress Releases ¡News œPrograms œTechnology œPartnering




¡Acorda Therapeutics Inc

 - 
1995.3 Ý—§B@spinal cord injury (SCI), multiple sclerosis (MS)‚ȂǂÌ_Œo•ª–ì
2008.2 Neurorecovery, Inc.‚𔃎û





œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ 000)2009200820072006200520042003/122003/62002/6”õl
Zanaflex”„ã49,95947,72839,42626,9444,809(4,417)---[tizanidine HCl]‹Ø’oŠÉÜ;áz«–ƒáƒ
LicenseŽû“ü4,714----
GrantŽû“ü-9960407336479382474132
Žû“ü@‡Œv54,67347,82739,48627,3515,145(3,938)382474132
‘e—˜‰v43,28436,47231,13020,22813(4,823)382474132
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v(81,257)(73,439)(39,448)(23,467)(34,411)(44,767)(36,773)(25,706)(22,338)
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(83,940)(74,340)(37,974)(24,019)(35,531)(44,741)(36,712)(25,734)(21,182)
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï34,61136,60422,41012,05512,89021,99916,74317,52711,147
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­ŠÖ˜AParty------3,3432,2654,687
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]249126
¡»•i•ƒpƒCƒvƒ‰ƒCƒ“
œAmpyra[dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine, 4-AP), ‹ŒFampridine-SR]@‘½”­«d‰»Ç
(Elan‚©‚ç‘S¢ŠE‚ÌŒ —˜Šl“¾B@•Ä‘AcordaA•Ä‘ŠOBiogen-IDEC)
y2009z
Ampyra was approved by the FDA in January 2010 for the improvement of walking in people with MS. This was demonstrated by an increase in walking speed. To our knowledge, Ampyra is the first and only product indicated to improve walking in people with MS. We intend to commercially launch Ampyra in the U.S. in March 2010, using our own specialty sales force. Under our 2009 Collaboration Agreement, Biogen Idec has the right to develop and commercialize Ampyra in markets outside the U.S. In January 2010, Biogen Idec announced that it submitted an MAA to the EMA and an NDS to Health Canada for Ampyra, known outside the U.S. as fampridine.

Ampyra is an oral treatment approved by the FDA on January 22, 2010 as a treatment to improve walking in patients with MS. This was demonstrated by an increase in walking speed. Ampyra demonstrated efficacy in people with all four major types of MS (relapsing remitting, secondary progressive, progressive relapsing and primary progressive). Ampyra can be used alone or with existing MS therapies, including immunomodulator drugs. Ampyra is an extended release tablet formulation of dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine, 4-AP), which was previously referred to as fampridine. We have obtained Orphan Drug designation from the FDA for dalfampridine in MS, which will provide Ampyra with seven years of market exclusivity for this use. We also have patents and pending patent applications covering Ampyra. We plan to file for patent term extension for Ampyra under the Hatch-Waxman law that allows for up to five additional years of patent protection based on the development timeline of a drug. We plan to submit the applications by the deadline of March 22, 2010. Although we plan to apply to extend the two patents that we expect to be listed in the FDA Orange Book (the list of approved drug products and their therapeutic equivalents, if any) for AMPYRA, we will ultimately need to select only one patent for extension, if granted.

Background

MS is a chronic, usually progressive disease in which the immune system attacks and degrades the function of nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord. These nerve fibers consist of long, thin fibers, or axons, surrounded by a myelin sheath, which provides insulation and facilitates the transmission of electrical impulses. In MS, the myelin sheath is damaged by the body's own immune system, causing areas of myelin sheath loss, also known as demyelination. This damage, which can occur at multiple sites in the CNS, blocks or diminishes conduction of electrical impulses. People with MS may suffer impairments in any number of neurological functions. These impairments vary from individual to individual and over the course of time, depending on which parts of the brain and spinal cord are affected, and often include difficulty walking. Individuals vary in the severity of the impairments they suffer on a day-to-day basis, with impairments becoming better or worse depending on the activity of the disease on a given day.

Dalfampridine is a potassium channel blocker. In animal studies, dalfampridine has been shown to increase conduction of nerve signals in demyelinated axons through blocking of potassium channels. The mechanism by which dalfampridine exerts its therapeutic effect has not been fully elucidated.

Clinical Studies and Safety Profile

Our New Drug Application (NDA) for Ampyra was based on data from a comprehensive development program assessing the safety and efficacy of Ampyra, including two Phase 3 trials that involved 540 people with MS. The primary measure of efficacy in our two Phase 3 MS trials was walking speed (in feet per second) as measured by the Timed 25-foot Walk (T25FW), using a responder analysis. A responder was defined as a patient who showed faster walking speed for at least three visits out of a possible four during the double-blind period than the maximum speed achieved in the five non-double-blind, no treatment visits (four before the double-blind period and one after). A significantly greater proportion of patients taking Ampyra 10 mg twice daily were responders compared to patients taking placebo, as measured by the T25FW (Trial 1: 34.8% vs. 8.3%; Trial 2: 42.9% vs. 9.3%). The increased response rate in the Ampyra group was observed across all four major types of MS. During the double-blind treatment period, a significantly greater proportion of patients taking Ampyra 10 mg twice daily had increases in walking speed of at least 10%, 20%, or 30% from baseline, compared to placebo. In both trials, the consistent improvements in walking speed were shown to be associated with improvements on a patient self-assessment of ambulatory disability, the 12 item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), for both drug and placebo treated patients. However, a drug placebo difference was not established for that outcome measure.

As part of our continuing evaluation of safety, we have conducted extension studies that allowed subjects in completed clinical trials to receive Ampyra on an unblinded, or open-label, basis, with their progress followed at regular clinical visits. As of January 22, 2010, 177 subjects from our Phase 2 clinical trial had been enrolled in an extension trial and 83, or approximately 47%, remained active in the trial, with duration of treatment of active patients ranging from 5.35 to 5.9 years. As of the same date, 269 patients from our first Phase 3 clinical trial had been enrolled in a separate extension study and 173 of these, or approximately 64.3%, remained active, with duration of treatment of active patients ranging from 1.65 to 4.17 years. Also as of that same date, 214 patients from our second Phase 3 clinical trial had been enrolled in a third extension study and 165, or approximately 77%, remained active, with duration of treatment of active patients ranging from 1.78 to 2.45 years. The total exposure to Ampyra in our MS studies as of January 22, 2010, including both double-blind and open label studies, was over 2,000 patient-years. We are evaluating whether the extension studies will be continued after Amypra is commercially available.

The FDA approved Ampyra with a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) consisting of a medication guide and communication plan. The goals of the communication plan include informing patients and healthcare providers about the serious risks, including seizures, associated with Ampyra, the importance of proper dosing, and the change of the established name from fampridine to dalfampridine. A medication guide will be dispensed to patients with each Ampyra prescription. We will implement a communication plan to support implementation of the REMS, consisting of letters to prescribers and pharmacists. In addition, the REMS includes a timetable for our submission of periodic assessments to the FDA of the REMS and patient and healthcare professional understanding of Ampyra's risks.

The FDA's approval letter also included certain post-marketing study requirements and confirmed certain commitments made by us with respect to Ampyra. The post-marketing requirements include additional animal toxicology studies to evaluate certain impurities, in vitro receptor binding and abuse potential studies in animals, and an evaluation of clinical adverse events related to abuse potential. In addition, we have committed to the FDA that we will conduct a placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a 5 mg twice daily dosing regimen of Ampyra, as well as an evaluation of a 7.5 mg dosage strength in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. We have also committed to report all post-marketing seizure events on an expedited basis to the FDA.

In our two Phase 3 clinical studies of Ampyra in SCI, the results did not reach statistical significance on their primary endpoints. Based on the entire body of data in clinical trials of Ampyra in people with SCI, we may resume development of Ampyra for SCI in the future, but have no current plans to do so.

Biogen Idec

On June 30, 2009, we entered into the Collaboration Agreement with Biogen Idec, pursuant to which we and Biogen Idec have agreed to collaborate on the development and commercialization of products containing aminopyridines, including Ampyra, initially directed to the treatment of MS (licensed products). The Collaboration Agreement includes a sublicense of our rights under an existing license agreement with Elan. We have also entered into a related supply agreement (Supply Agreement) pursuant to which we will supply Biogen Idec with its requirements for the licensed products through our existing supply agreement with Elan. Biogen Idec Inc., the parent of Biogen Idec, has guaranteed the performance of Biogen Idec's obligations under the Collaboration Agreement and the Supply Agreement.

Under the Collaboration Agreement, Biogen Idec, itself or through its affiliates, has the exclusive right to commercialize licensed products in all countries outside of the U.S., while we retain the exclusive right to commercialize licensed products in the U.S. Each party will have the exclusive right to develop licensed products for its commercialization territory, although the parties may also decide to jointly carry out mutually agreed future development activities under a cost-sharing arrangement. If Biogen Idec does not participate in the development of licensed products for certain indications or forms of administration, it may lose the right to develop and commercialize the licensed products for such indication or form of administration. Biogen Idec may sublicense its rights to certain unaffiliated distributors. During the term of the Collaboration Agreement and for two years after the Collaboration Agreement terminates, neither party nor its affiliates may, other than pursuant to the Collaboration Agreement, research, develop, manufacture or commercialize any competing product, defined as one that contains aminopyridine or any other compound that acts at least in part through direct interaction with potassium channels to improve neurological function in MS, SCI or other demyelinating conditions, except that we may exploit the licensed products anywhere in the world following termination of the Collaboration Agreement.

In consideration for the rights granted to Biogen Idec under the Collaboration Agreement, we were entitled to a non-refundable upfront payment of $110.0 million as of June 30, 2009, which was received on July 1, 2009. Also, as a result of such payment to us, a payment of $7.7 million became payable by us to Elan. We currently estimate the revenue recognition period under the Collaboration Agreement for upfront and milestone payments to be approximately 12 years from the date of this agreement. The Company recognized $4.7 million in license revenue related to the $110.0 million received from Biogen Idec and $330,000 in cost of license revenue related to the $7.7 million paid to Elan during the year ended December 31, 2009. We are also eligible to receive up to $400 million from Biogen Idec if specified regulatory and sales milestones are met.

Under the Collaboration Agreement, we will also be entitled to receive double-digit tiered royalties on sales of licensed products by Biogen Idec, its affiliates or certain distributors outside of the U.S. Such royalties for products combining a licensed compound with at least one other clinically active therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic ingredient are determined based on the contribution of the licensed compound to the overall sales or value of the combination product. Biogen Idec may offset against the royalties payable to us a portion of certain royalties that it may need to pay to third parties.

Biogen Idec will exclusively purchase all of Biogen Idec's, its affiliates' and its sublicensees' requirements of the licensed products from us. The purchase price paid by Biogen Idec for licensed products under the Collaboration Agreement and Supply Agreement reflects the prices owed to our suppliers under our supply arrangements with Elan or other suppliers. In addition, Biogen Idec will pay us, in consideration for its purchase and sale of the licensed products, any amounts due to Elan for ex-U.S. sales, including royalties owed under the terms of our existing agreements with Elan.

The Collaboration Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of Biogen Idec's royalty payment obligations, which occurs, on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis, upon the latest of expiration of the last-to-expire patent covering a licensed product, fifteen years following first commercial sale of such licensed product, the expiration of regulatory exclusivity and the existence of certain levels of sales by competing products. The Collaboration Agreement and the Supply Agreement will automatically terminate upon the termination of our license agreement with Elan in its entirety or with respect to all countries outside of the U.S. We cannot terminate our license agreement with Elan without Biogen Idec's prior written consent under certain circumstances. Biogen Idec may terminate the Collaboration Agreement in its entirety or on a country-by-country basis at any time upon 180 days' prior written notice, subject to our right to accelerate such termination. The Collaboration Agreement may also be terminated by either party if the other party fails to cure a material breach under the agreement, which termination will be limited to a particular country or region under certain circumstances. However, if Biogen Idec has the right to terminate the Collaboration Agreement due to our material uncured breach, Biogen Idec may instead elect to keep the agreement in effect, but decrease the royalty rates they pay us by a specified percentage. We may also terminate the Collaboration Agreement if Biogen Idec does not commercially launch a licensed product within a specified time period after receiving regulatory approval for such licensed product or otherwise fails to meet certain commercialization obligations. In addition, we may terminate the Collaboration Agreement under certain circumstances if (i) Biogen Idec, its affiliates or its sublicensees challenge certain of our patents or (ii) there is a change in control of Biogen Idec or its parent company or certain dispositions of assets by Biogen Idec, its parent or its affiliated companies, followed by a change in the sales and marketing personnel responsible for the licensed products in Biogen Idec's territory of more than a specified percentage within a certain period of time after such change in control or disposition. The Supply Agreement may be terminated by either party if the other party fails to cure a material breach under the Supply Agreement. In addition, the Supply Agreement will terminate automatically upon termination of the Collaboration Agreement, and the Collaboration Agreement will terminate automatically if the Supply Agreement is terminated for any reason other than for a material breach that we are responsible for. To the extent permitted by law, each party may terminate the Collaboration Agreement and the Supply Agreement if the other party is subject to bankruptcy proceedings.

If the Supply Agreement is terminated by Biogen Idec for an uncured material breach, we will waive our right for Elan to exclusively supply the licensed products to us solely to permit Biogen Idec to negotiate terms with Elan for the supply of licensed products to Biogen Idec. If the Supply Agreement is otherwise terminated, Biogen Idec will not have any future obligations to purchase licensed products from us and we will not have any future obligations to supply Biogen Idec with licensed products. If the Collaboration Agreement is terminated, Biogen Idec will assign to us all regulatory documentation and other information necessary or useful to exploit the licensed products in the terminated countries and will grant us a license under Biogen Idec's and its affiliates' relevant patent rights, know-how and trademarks to exploit the licensed products in the terminated countries. Such assignment and license will be at no cost to us unless the Collaboration Agreement is terminated by Biogen Idec for a material uncured breach that we are responsible for, in which case the parties will negotiate a payment to Biogen Idec to reflect the net value of such assigned and licensed rights.

Neither party may assign the agreements without the prior written consent of the other, except to an affiliate or, in certain cases, to a third party acquirer of the party.

Elan Corporation plc

Ampyra

In September 2003, we entered into an amended and restated license agreement with Elan that replaced two prior license agreements for Ampyra in oral sustained release dosage form. Under this agreement, Elan granted us exclusive worldwide rights to Ampyra for all indications, including SCI, MS and all other indications. We agreed to pay Elan milestone payments of up to $15.0 million and royalties based on net sales of products with dalfampridine as the active ingredient. We also agreed to pay Elan 7% of any upfront and milestone payments that we receive from the sublicensing of rights to Ampyra or other aminopyridine products, and in the third quarter 2009, as a result of our Collaboration Agreement with Biogen Idec, we paid Elan $7.7 million. The FDA approval of Ampyra has triggered a milestone of $2.5 million to Elan that will be paid in 2010.

Elan is also obligated under this agreement to supply us with our commercial requirements for Ampyra in the U.S., as well as to supply Biogen Idec under the Supply Agreement and Consent Agreement with Ampyra for Biogen Idec's clinical trials and for Biogen Idec's commercial requirements.

Elan may terminate our license in countries in which we have a license, if we fail to file regulatory approvals within a commercially reasonable time after completion and receipt of positive data from all preclinical and clinical studies required for the related NDA equivalent. We could also lose our rights under the license agreement if we fail to launch a product in such countries within 180 days of NDA or equivalent approval or if we fail to fulfill our payment obligations under the license agreement. If Elan terminates our license in any applicable country, Elan is entitled to license from us our patent rights and know-how relating to the product and to market the product in the applicable country, subject to royalty payments to us.

We have the right to terminate the Elan license at any time by written notice. In addition, the Elan license may be immediately terminated by either party following an incurable breach of any term or provision by the other party. The Elan license may also be terminated by either party following notice and the expiration of a cure period with respect to an uncured breach by either party.

Subject to the early termination provisions, the Elan license terminates on a country by country basis on the last to occur of fifteen years from the date of the agreement, the expiration of the last to expire Elan patent or the existence of competition in that country.

Competition - MS

Current disease management approaches to MS are classified either as relapse management or disease course management approaches. For relapse management, the majority of neurologists treat sudden and severe relapses with a four-day course of intravenous high-dose corticosteroids. Many of these corticosteroids are available generically. For disease course management, there are a number of FDA-approved MS therapies that seek to modify the immune system. These treatments attempt to reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations or slow the accumulation of physical disability for people with certain types of MS, though their precise mechanisms of action are not known. These products include Avonex from Biogen-IDEC, Betaseron from Schering AG, Copaxone from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Rebif from Merck Serono, and Tysabri from Biogen-IDEC and Elan.

To our knowledge, Ampyra is the first product that is approved as a treatment to improve walking in patients with MS. This was demonstrated by walking speed. Several biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, as well as academic laboratories, are involved in research and/or product development for various neurological diseases, including MS. Other companies also have products in clinical development, including products approved for other indications in MS, to address improvement of walking ability in people with MS. We are aware that Sanofi-aventis is developing a sodium/potassium channel blocker, nerispirdine, with a potential indication in MS and other conditions. We believe that nerispirdine is in clinical trials for walking in MS and, depending on the results of those trials, any resulting product might compete with Ampyra. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BioMarin) acquired the rights formerly owned by EUSA Pharma to amifampridine phosphate, a 3,4-diaminopyridine compound, which in January 2010 received marketing authorization in the EU for use in Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). BioMarin has announced that it will be working to determine the regulatory path for approval in the U.S. for LEMS, as well as exploring developing the product for use in other indications, which may include MS. In the EU, and the U.S., if this product is successfully developed and approved, physicians might prescribe it instead of Ampyra even if it were not approved for MS. In certain circumstances, pharmacists are not prohibited from formulating certain drug compounds to fill prescriptions on an individual patient basis. We are aware that at present compounded dalfampridine is used by some people with MS. Although we expect this use to decrease substantially when Ampyra is commercially launched, it is possible that some people will continue to use compounded dalfampridine. Several companies are engaged in developing products that include novel immune system approaches and cell transplant approaches to remyelination for the treatment of people with MS. These programs are in early stages of development and may compete with Ampyra or our preclinical candidates in the future.

We believe that Ampyra may be complementary to both the relapse management and disease course management therapies that are commercially available. Nonetheless, Ampyra may compete for market acceptance with these current treatments because they have been accepted and regularly prescribed to people with MS by physicians, or because they are being promoted to improve walking or other neurological functions.

y2006z
2006.9 P3 Start for improvement of walking ability in people.
In this trial, statistical significance was achieved on all three efficacy criteria defined in the SPA.  
In January 1997, we licensed from Elan exclusive worldwide rights to Elanfs sustained release formulation of fampridine, Fampridine-SR, for the treatment of SCI. In April 1998, we formed MS Research & Development Corporation, or MSRD, with Elanfs subsidiary, Elan International Services, Ltd., or EIS, to develop Fampridine-SR for treatment of MS. At that time, MSRD licensed from Elan exclusive worldwide rights to Fampridine-SR for the treatment of MS.

In September 2003, we entered into a termination and assignment agreement with Elan, EIS and MSRD pursuant to which MSRD assigned to us its assets, including the license from Elan for Fampridine-SR for MS. We paid MSRD approximately $11.5 million for all the assets and assumed liabilities of MSRD. MSRD distributed the purchase price to its shareholders according to their equity ownership interest. We received a distribution of approximately $9.5 million. We also purchased EISfs shares at par value, and own approximately 88% of MSRD, which now has no assets or liabilities and is inactive.

In September 2003, we entered into an amended and restated license with Elan, which replaced the two prior licenses for Fampridine-SR in oral sustained release dosage form. Under this agreement, Elan granted us exclusive worldwide rights to Fampridine-SR for all indications, including SCI, MS and all other indications. We agreed to pay Elan milestone payments of up to $15.0 million and royalties based on net sales of the product, if approved. We have not made any payments under this agreement through December 31, 2006.

Elan is responsible for completing the chemistry, manufacturing and controls section of our New Drug Application, or NDA for Fampridine-SR and equivalent regulatory applications outside the United States. Elan is also supplying us with product for our clinical trials under this agreement.

Elan may terminate our license in countries in which we have a license, including the United States, if we fail to file regulatory approvals within a commercially reasonable time after completion and receipt of positive data from all preclinical and clinical studies required for the related NDA or any NDA equivalent. We could also lose our rights under the license agreement if we fail to launch a product in such countries within 180 days of NDA or equivalent approval or if we fail to fulfill our payment obligations under the license agreement. If Elan terminates our license in any applicable country, Elan is entitled to license from us our patent rights and know-how relating to the product and to market the product in the applicable country, subject to royalty payments to us.

We have the right to terminate the Elan license at any time by written notice. In addition, the Elan license may be immediately terminated by either party following an incurable breach of any term or provision by the other party. The Elan license may also be terminated by either party following notice and a cure period with respect to an uncured breach by either party.

Subject to the early termination provisions, the Elan license terminates on a country by country basis on the last to occur of fifteen years from the date of the agreement, the expiration of the last to expire Elan patent or the existence of competition in that country.


œ[Zanaflex] (tizanidine)@‹Ø’oŠÉÜ(ázk/spasticity)
y2009z
Sales of Zanaflex Capsules, which we launched in April 2005, and Zanaflex tablets increased from $53.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $58.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets commercial operations were cash flow positive in 2008 and 2009. Both products are FDA-approved as short-acting drugs for the management of spasticity, a symptom of many CNS disorders, including MS and SCI. These products contain tizanidine, one of the two leading drugs used to treat spasticity. We expect sales of Zanaflex Capsules will decline in 2010 due to increasing managed care pressure, among other factors.

Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets contain tizanidine, one of the two leading active ingredients used for the management of spasticity. Tizanidine is approved by the FDA as a short-acting drug for the management of spasticity. We acquired from Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Elan) all of its U.S. sales, marketing and distribution rights to Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets in July 2004. Zanaflex tablets were approved by the FDA in 1996 and lost compound patent protection in 2002. There are currently over 10 generic versions of tizanidine tablets on the market. However, substantial brand loyalty remains in the prescriber community for the Zanaflex brand. Most prescriptions for tizanidine tablets are written as "Zanaflex," although the majority are automatically substituted at the pharmacy for a generic tizanidine tablet. Zanaflex Capsules were approved by the FDA in 2002, but were never marketed by Elan. We began marketing Zanaflex Capsules in April 2005.

Background

Spasticity refers to the often painful involuntary tensing, stiffening or contracting of muscles. Spasticity is not a disease but a symptom of other conditions, such as MS, SCI, stroke, traumatic brain injury and cerebral palsy, where portions of the nervous system that control voluntary movement have been damaged. This damage results in the nerve cells in the spinal cord becoming disconnected from controlling centers in the brain and, as a result, transmitting unregulated impulses to the muscles. People who have spasticity may experience it intermittently€kÀit may be triggered by a stimulus, such as pain, pressure sores, cold weather or a urinary tract infection. The majority of people with MS and SCI experience some form of spasticity, as do many people following stroke or brain injuries. We Move, a non-profit organization dedicated to movement disorders, estimates that spasticity affects approximately 500,000 people in the U.S. and over 12 million worldwide.

Clinical Studies

Clinical trials conducted by Elan demonstrated that Zanaflex Capsules, when taken with food, produce average peak levels of tizanidine in a person's blood that are lower and rise more gradually compared to the peak levels following a similar dose of the tablet form. The FDA recognizes these pharmacokinetic differences and therefore has determined that Zanaflex tablets and generic tizanidine tablets are not therapeutically equivalent, that is, are not AB-rated to Zanaflex Capsules. As a result, under state pharmacy laws, prescriptions written for Zanaflex Capsules may not be filled by the pharmacist with Zanaflex tablets or generic tizanidine tablets, although some substitution does take place in practice.

Elan Corporation plc

Zanaflex

In July 2004, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Elan pursuant to which we acquired all of Elan's research, development, distribution, sales and marketing rights to Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets in the U.S. The assets acquired include the products' FDA registrations and FDA dossiers, proprietary product know-how, a patent and two related patent applications, certain inventory of Zanaflex tablets and certain product books and records. Elan also granted us a license allowing us to use the Zanaflex trademarks in the U.S., with the right to buy the Zanaflex trademark for a nominal sum once specified milestone and royalty payments were made. Those payments have been made, and we purchased and now own the trademarks. Elan also granted us an exclusive, perpetual and royalty-free license to certain intellectual property relating to technology contained in Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets or used in the manufacture of Zanaflex Capsules, for use in connection with the sale and marketing of Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets in the U.S. We also acquired the right to develop new indications, formulations, dosage forms, delivery systems and process improvements of Zanaflex. Under the agreement, Elan agreed not to directly or indirectly market, distribute or sell any products containing tizanidine as an active pharmaceutical ingredient in the U.S. until the later of the end of our obligation to pay royalties to Elan or valid termination of our supply agreement with Elan. In addition, we agreed not to directly or indirectly market, distribute or sell any products containing tizanidine as its active pharmaceutical ingredient in the United Kingdom or Ireland until July 2007.

Our agreement with Elan obligated us to pay a combination of sales-based milestone payments of up to $19.5 million, all of which have been achieved and paid, and royalties on sales of Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets. We have no further Zanaflex milestone payment obligations with Elan. We also agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize Zanaflex Capsules.

As part of the acquisition, we assumed certain of Elan's rights and obligations relating to Zanaflex under a license agreement with Novartis, to the extent that these rights and obligations arise subsequent to our acquisition of Zanaflex. Under this agreement we obtained certain rights to market and sell tizanidine products and rights to product improvements developed by Novartis.

Elan manufactures Zanaflex Capsules for us and we are in contract negotiations with Patheon Inc. for the manufacture of Zanaflex tablets. See "€kÀManufacturing."

In December 2005, we entered into a financing arrangement with Paul Royalty Fund, or PRF, pursuant to which we assigned PRF the right to receive a portion of our net revenues from Zanaflex Capsules, Zanaflex tablets and any future Zanaflex products. This agreement was amended in November 2006 potentially to increase the total amount of royalty payments to which PRF is entitled and to provide for additional lump-sum payments both from us to PRF and from PRF to us. The arrangement covers all Zanaflex net revenues generated from October 1, 2005 through and including December 31, 2015, unless the arrangement is terminated earlier. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations€kÀLiquidity and Capital Resources€kÀFinancing Arrangements."

Competition - Spasticity

Tizanidine, the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Zanaflex Capsules, Zanaflex tablets and generic tizanidine tablets, is one of the two leading FDA-approved treatments for spasticity, a symptom suffered by both MS and SCI patients. Zanaflex tablets were approved by the FDA in 1996 and lost compound patent protection in 2002. Twelve generic manufacturers of tizanidine are distributing their own tablet formulations. As noted under "€kÀIntellectual Property€kÀZanaflex" above, the Company is in litigation with Apotex with regard to its filing of an ANDA for the approval of a purported generic version of Zanaflex Capsules and certification against the Company's patent. In addition, several companies have reported that they are working on potential new delivery formulations of tizanidine. Baclofen, which is also available generically, is the other leading drug for the treatment of spasticity. The mechanism of action and associated effects of baclofen are different from those of tizanidine. Due to the different pharmacokinetic profile of Zanaflex Capsules, Zanaflex tablets and generic tizanidine tablets are not AB-rated with Zanaflex Capsules.

y2006z
2004.7 We acquired all marketing, sales and distribution rights in the United States
	 to Zanaflex Capsules and Zanaflex tablets from Elan.
These products contain tizanidine, one of the two leading treatments for spasticity.
 Zanaflex Capsules are the only approved capsule formulation of tizanidine and are
 protected by a patent that expires in 2021. 
These products contain tizanidine, one of the two leading treatments for the management of spasticity. Zanaflex tablets were approved by the FDA in 1996 and lost compound patent protection in 2002. There are currently 12 generic versions of tizanidine tablets on the market. However, substantial brand loyalty remains in the prescriber community for the Zanaflex brand. Approximately 90% of all prescriptions for tizanidine tablets are written as gZanaflex,h although most are switched automatically at the pharmacy for a generic tizanidine tablet. Zanaflex Capsules were approved by the FDA in 2002, but were never marketed by Elan. We began marketing Zanaflex Capsules in April 2005.

Clinical trials conducted by Elan demonstrated that Zanaflex Capsules, when taken with food, produce average peak levels of tizanidine in a personfs blood that are lower and rise more gradually compared to the peak levels following a similar dose of the tablet form. The FDA recognizes these pharmacokinetic differences and therefore has determined that Zanaflex tablets and generic tizanidine tablets are not therapeutically equivalent, that is, are not AB-rated to Zanaflex Capsules. As a result, under state pharmacy laws, prescriptions written for Zanaflex Capsules may not be filled by the pharmacist with Zanaflex tablets or generic tizanidine tablets, although some substitution does take place in practice. Zanaflex Capsules are available in 2 mg, 4 mg and 6 mg doses, while tablet formulations are only available in 2 mg and 4 mg doses. Our goal is to convert sales of Zanaflex tablets and generic tizanidine tablets to sales of Zanaflex Capsules. We discontinued supply of the 2 mg dose of Zanaflex tablets in February 2006 due to a reduction in demand, and we do not intend to order additional supply of this product in the future. Demand for the 4 mg Zanaflex tablet is also declining, but supports continued supply. The 6 mg capsule gives patients and physicians an additional dosing choice and an opportunity to reduce the number of pills a patient must take daily. In addition, many patients may find capsules easier to swallow than tablets. Also, people who have difficulty swallowing may open the capsule and sprinkle it on food. The pharmacokinetic effect of sprinkling contents of the capsule on food, however, is different from when the intact capsule is taken with food.

In 2006, retail sales of Zanaflex capsules, Zanaflex tablets and generic equivalents of Zanaflex tablets (tizanidine) totaled approximately $290 million. For the same period, retail sales of Baclofen totaled approximately $181 million, for an approximate aggregate market of $471 million. The vast majority of these prescriptions were written by a relatively small group of prescribers. Specialists accounted for approximately 40% of tizanidine prescribing. High-volume specialist prescribers were responsible for approximately two or three-and-one-half times more prescriptions per physician than high-volume primary care prescribers. We believe that our internal specialty sales force including our tele-sales team, will be able to reach virtually all of these high-volume prescribers.

[Spasticity 2006]

Spasticity refers to the often painful involuntary tensing, stiffening or contracting of muscles. Spasticity is not a disease but a symptom of other conditions, such as MS, SCI, stroke, traumatic brain injury and cerebral palsy, where portions of the nervous system that control voluntary movement have been damaged. This damage results in the nerve cells in the spinal cord becoming disconnected from controlling centers in the brain and, as a result, transmitting unregulated impulses to the muscles. People who have spasticity may experience it intermittently?it may be triggered by a stimulus, such as pain, pressure sores, cold weather or a urinary tract infection. The majority of people with MS and SCI experience some form of spasticity, as do many people following stroke or brain injuries. We Move, a non-profit organization dedicated to movement disorders, estimates that spasticity affects approximately 500,000 people in the United States and over 12 million worldwide.

Current treatments for spasticity are focused on reducing spasm frequency, pain or irritating stimuli that can provoke spasticity. Treatment of spasticity often involves a combination of physical therapy and oral medications. Baclofen and tizanidine, the active ingredient in the Zanaflex products, are the two most frequently prescribed oral medications for spasticity. For more intractable spasticity, treatments sometimes include surgical or chemical destruction of nerve roots in the affected area.


œ
yz
œAcorda Therapeutics Inc

¡Investors Relations œNews & Announcements

Additional Phase 3 Clinical Trial Data Published in Annals of Neurology Showing Dalfampridine Extended Release Tablets Improved Walking Ability in People with Multiple Sclerosis[2010.11.17]
Acorda Therapeutics Reports Third Quarter 2010 Financial Results[2010.11.1] - AMPYRA(R) (dalfampridine) Extended Release Tablets‚Í2010.3.1”­”„A[Q1]$3.4 million , [Q2]$29.7 million , [Q3] $52.6 million
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Data on AMPYRA(R) (dalfampridine) Presented at 26th Congress of European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis[2010.10.15]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Data on AMPYRA(TM) (dalfampridine) Presented at American Academy of Neurology Meeting[2010.4.13]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Filing of Patent Extension Applications for AMPYRA(TM) (dalfampridine)[2010.3.22]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Availability of AMPYRA(TM) (dalfampridine)[2010.3.1]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Pricing and Patient Assistance Programs for AMPYRATM (dalfampridine)[2010.2.3]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces FDA Approval of AMPYRA(TM) (dalfampridine) to Improve Walking in People with Multiple Sclerosis - Demonstrated by Increases in Walking Speed[2010.1.22]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Positive Vote by FDA Advisory Committee for Fampridine-SR[2009.10.14]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Posting of Briefing Documents for October 14 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting on Fampridine-SR[2009.10.9]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Data on Retention Rates and Safety from Two Phase 3 Fampridine-SR Extension Studies[2009.9.15]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Interim Analysis of Two-Year Efficacy and Safety Data from Phase 3 Fampridine-SR Extension Study[2009.9.10]
Acorda Therapeutics Reports Date of FDA Advisory Committee Review of Fampridine-SR for Improvement of Walking Ability in People with MS[2009.8.25]
Biogen Idec and Acorda Therapeutics Announce Collaboration Agreement to Develop and Commercialize MS Therapy Fampridine-SR in Markets Outside the U.S.[2009.7.1]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces FDA Acceptance of Fampridine-SR New Drug Application for Filing[2009.5.6]
Study Highlights Economic Impact of Early Mobility Impairment in People with Multiple Sclerosis[2009.4.29]
Acorda Therapeutics Resubmits New Drug Application for Fampridine-SR for Improvement of Walking Ability in People with Multiple Sclerosis[2009.4.23]
Acorda Therapeutics Receives Refuse to File Letter from FDA on Fampridine-SR NDA[2009.3.31]
Data Published in The Lancet Show Fampridine-SR Improved Walking Ability in People with Multiple Sclerosis[2009.2.26]
Acorda Therapeutics Submits New Drug Application for Fampridine-SR for Improvement of Walking Ability in People with Multiple Sclerosis[2009.2.2]
Acorda Therapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2007 Financial Results[2008.2.11]
Acorda Therapeutics Announces Acquisition of Aminopyridine and Pre-Clinical Assets from Neurorecovery, Inc.[2008.2.4]
Acorda Therapeutics Partners with Cardinal Health to Expand Sales Force for ZANAFLEX CAPSULES[2005.11.10]
Acorda Therapeutics Launches ZANAFLEX(R) CAPSULES for the Management of Spasticity in People with MS and Spinal Cord Injury[2005.4.4]
 - AcordaŽÐ‚ÍZANAFLEX(R) CAPSULES and ZANAFLEX(R) (tizanidine HCl) tablets
‚ð1994.7 Elan Corp‚©‚çŽæ“¾B ¡‰ñ‚̓JƒvƒZƒ‹Ü6mg‚ðV”­”„B



œSEC Filings
10-K Annual report[2010.2.26] - [pdf] - [doc] - [xls]
10-K Annual report[2007.3.26] - [pdf] - [word] - [xls]

œAnual Reports




¡Products & Research
œPipeline
œZanaflex CapsulesTM(tizanidine hydrochloride) 
œAMPYRA  (dalfampridine) Extended Release Tablets







¡Actelion Ltd

 -http://www.actelion.com/
 ‘n—§1997.12G –{ŽÐƒXƒCƒXG@]‹Æˆõ”1,900l(2009.3); ¢ŠE‚ÉŽq‰ïŽÐ‚P‚TŽÐ(“ú–{ŠÜ‚Þ)
SWX Swiss Exchange (ticker symbol:ATLN)ãê.

Actelion Ltd
Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd 

œŒˆŽZ
(CHF milllion)200920082007200620052004200320022001”õl
”„ã1,772.564(+23)1,473.508(+12)1,317.392(+)945.7(+43)663.6(+41)471.9307.5132.414.0

Tracleer1,508.0(+19)1,294.1(+10)1,180(+31)898.7633.2449.2299.7121.83.4(Bosentan)”x‚ŒŒˆ³
Zavesca53.1(+38)40.1(+14)35.3(+39)25.414.46.10.7--(miglustat)[2003t‚ɉp“Æ”­”„]Ž‰Ž¿’~ψÙíƒS[ƒVƒF•a
Ventavis136.994.6(+21)78.2[inhaled iloprost]”x‚ŒŒˆ³
Œ_–ñŽû“ü74.57444.60225.30921.516.016.57.210.610.6

‰c‹ÆŒo”ï1,433.1581,102.151(-6)1,174.790(+)677.5(+33)511.3(+32)386.3309.2164.5116.6
Œoí—˜‰v[EBIT]338.522337.522
‹Œ352.939
168.274268.2(+76)152.3(+78)85.6(-1.7)(-32.0)(-102.5)
ƒ—˜‰v311.270306.073
‹Œ321.490(+158)
124.586(+)241.1(+92)125.5(+44)87.2(-9.9)(-52.1)(-122.9)

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï464.136374.530292.137211.8171.5136.379.250.658.7
]‹Æˆõ”2,2631,9001028854660412263
[09.01.01]SFr[CHF]=\85.19 šƒpƒCƒvƒ‰ƒCƒ“ bosentan P3 Ischemic Digital ulcers in patients with systemic Sclerosis -RAPIDS-1 (RAndomized, double-blind, Placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase III study)@I—¹2004.12 - published in Arthritis and Rheumatism (Volume 50, Issue 12, page 3985-93). bosentan P3 Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (BUILD-1: Bosentan Use in Interstitial Lung Disease ;158—á) and the scleroderma-related form of pulmonary fibrosis (BUILD-2; 162—á) @@2004.9ŠJŽnA2005Œã”¼`2006‘O”¼I—¹—\’è *1998.11.4 RocheŽÐ‚©‚ç‘S¢ŠE“ÆèŠJ”­»‘¢”Ì”„Œ ‚ðŠl“¾B tezosentan ‹}«S•s‘S@ŠJ”­’†Ž~(2004.11) - VERITAS (Value of Endothelin Receptor Inhibition with Tezosentan in Acute heart failure Study), for futility reasons *tezosentan‚ÍA1998.3.19 Roche‚©‚ç‘S¢ŠE“Æè»‘¢”Ì”„Œ ‚ðŠl“¾B *miglustat(Zavesca)‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚ÄA2002.11.22 Oxford GlycoSciences (OGS)‚ÆŒ_–ñB @OGS‚ÍCelltech Group plc(UCB SA‚É”ƒŽû) ‚É”ƒŽû‚³‚ꂽB@1998”N‚ÉOGS‚Ímiglustat‚ðG.D.Searle‚©‚烉ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚ðŽó‚¯‚Ä‚¢‚éB @“–ŽÐ‚ÍOGS‚©‚çƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹‚𜂭‘S¢ŠE“Æè”Ì”„Œ ‚ð‹–‘ø‚³‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚éB@2005.11.17‚©‚çroyaltyŽx•¥æ‚ªOGS/Celltech‚©‚çUCB‚É•ÏXB @‚È‚¨ƒCƒXƒ‰ƒGƒ‹‚ł̃‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚ÍTeva‚ª•Û—LB [2006] Actelion's second product on the market, Zavesca(R) (miglustat), achieved sales of CHF 25.4 million in 2006, almost doubling from the previous year. Zavesca(R), currently indicated for mild to moderate type 1 Gaucher patients unwilling or unable to undergo enzyme replacement therapy with Genzyme's Cerezyme(R) (imiglucerase), combines a novel mode of action with a convenient oral form. The key to capturing a greater share of the current USD 900-million market is the MAINTENANCE study, which evaluates whether patients with type 1 Gaucher disease treated with imiglucerase remain stable after switching to Zavesca(R). Recently generated clinical data with Zavesca(R) in another rare liposomal storage disease, Niemann Pick Type C, has led to a regulatory filing in the European Union to expand the label in this indication.
œActelion Ltd

¡Products œTracleer.com --- http://www.tracleer.com/ Full Prescribing Information[pdf] Full Prescribing Information[pdf, 9p] œZevesca (miglustat) 1 Gaucher diseaseŽ¡—Öò(y‘f•â[—Ö@) ¡Journalists œNews Archives Tracleer Excellence Post Marketing Surveillance Programme (TRAX PMSTM) confirms long-term safety profile in various pulmonary arterial hypertension subgroups[2005.9.5] JACC publication on Tracleer in children with PAH[2005.8.16] - Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) ‚ª’·ŠúŒ¤‹†‚ð”­•\ (Rosenzweig E.B. et al. Volume 46 Issue 4 Pages 697-704).‚W‚U—á Actelion launches Tracleer in PAH in Japan[2005.6.8] Japanese Approval for TracleerR in PAH[2005.4.11] Actelion provides update on bosentan in Japan[2005.2.18] Actelion files New Drug Application for TracleerR in Japan[2003.4.8] ¡Scientists œDevelopment Pipeline šTracleer (bosentan)(sildenafil‚Ƃ̔z‡Ü)P4 šZavesca (miglustat)(ƒS[ƒVƒF•a)P4 šClazosentan(“®–¬áŽ«‚­‚à–Œ‰ºoŒŒ)P3 šAlmorexant(•s–°Ç)P3 šMacitentan(”x‚ŒŒˆ³)P3 šSelexipag(”x‚ŒŒˆ³)P3 ¡Investors œFinancial Information`”N•ñAGAAPŽl”¼Šú•ñ Actelion announces Full Year 2008 financial results[2009.2.19] Actelion announces Full Year 2007 financial results[2008.2.21] Actelion announces Full Year 2006 financial results[2007.2.22] Actelion announces Full Year 2005 financial results[2006.2.23] Actelion announces 9-month results for 2005[2005.10.19] - In the first nine months of 2005, TracleerR sales were CHF 455.1 million (9 m onths 2004: CHF 325.4 m). 34ƒJ‘‚Å”­”„ US GAAP FY 2009 US GAAP FY 2008 US GAAP FY 2007 Annual Report 2009[pdf,114p] Annual Report 2008[pdf,111p] Annual Report 2007[pdf,90p] Annual Report 2006 - [pdf] Annual Report 2005 - [pdf] Annual Report 2004 - [pdf] Annual Report 2003 - [pdf]
œƒAƒNƒeƒŠƒIƒ“@ƒtƒ@[ƒ}ƒVƒ…[ƒeƒBƒJƒ‹ƒY@ƒWƒƒƒpƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ

- http://www.actelion.co.jp/ ‚Q‚O‚O‚P”N‚P‚OŒŽAƒXƒCƒX‚ÌActelion LtdiƒAƒNƒeƒŠƒIƒ“ŽÐj‚Ì‚P‚O‚O“Žq‰ïŽÐ‚Æ‚µ‚ÄA“Œ‹ž‚ÉÝ—§B ]‹Æˆõ” ‚P‚O‚X–¼i‚Q‚O‚O‚V”N‚RŒŽ‚P“úŒ»Ýj œ»•iî•ñ šƒgƒ‰ƒNƒŠƒA - ˆã—Ê֌WŽÒ - “Y•t•¶‘[pdf] œŠˆ“®ó‹µ šÅ‹ß‚ÌŠˆ“®ó‹µ šƒjƒ…[ƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX œŒ¤‹†EŠJ”­ šŒ¤‹†ŠJ”­î•ñ š‰¢•Ä‚ÌŒ¤‹†EŠJ”­







¡Adams Laboratories Inc.

 - http://www.adamslaboratories.com/

œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ(‚UŒŽ––)@@Nasdaqãê\¿’†"ARxT." 
($Million)@2004/6@2003/6
ƒ”„ã‚@@ 61.3    14.0
ƒ—˜‰v@@@ 35.2   -23.3
]‹Æˆõ”@@@90l
1985”NAdams Laboratories, Inc.‚ÍAJohn Q. Adams, Sr‚É‚æ‚è‘n—§Bŋ߂܂œ¯ŽÐCEOB
“¯Ž‚ÍBaylor Labs”ƒŽû,Allerderm LabsÝ—§‚ÉŽÀŽ{B
[Biz.Yahoo]Adams Laboratories, Inc. Company Profile
DFBT - Event Details(2003) - John Q. Adams, Sr Interview
UPDATE 2-Adams Laboratories seeks $125 mln IPO[Reuter 2005.3.25]
 - Ž„Šé‹ÆAdams Laboratories Inc.‚Í$125 million‘Š“–‚ÌŠ”Ž®‚ðŒöŠJB
 “¯ŽÐŽå—Í•iMucinex‚ÍSudafed[Pfizer], Nyquil[P&G], Theraflu[Novartis] ,Claritin[Schering-Plough]‚Æ‹£‡B

ŠÖ˜A‰ïŽÐœAdams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. -http://www.adamsrt.com/
@“¯ŽÐ‚ÍAdams Labs‚̌ċzŠí޾г—p–ò܂̊J”­A»‘¢A”Ì”„‚ð–Ú“I‚Æ‚µ‚ÄÝ—§B




œAdams Laboratories Inc.

œProducts šMucinex šMucinex DM ŠPŽ~‚ß@”­”„September 2004 šhttp://www.mucinex.com/ Mucinex DrugFacts œNews šPress Releases šProduct Launches







¡Aderis Pharmaceuticals[US]

1994.4  Ethyl CorpŽq‰ïŽÐWhitby Research Inc‚ÌŒ¤‹†ƒvƒƒOƒ‰ƒ€”ƒŽû‚É‚æ‚èÝ—§B
1998.8  Schwarz Pharma‚ƃp[ƒLƒ“ƒ\ƒ“•a—pƒpƒbƒ`ÜŠJ”­‚Å’ñŒg
2001.11 rotigotine CDS P3‚Ö
2002.1  Discovery Therapeutics‚ðAderis Pharmaceuticals‚ɎЖ¼•ÏX



œAderis Pharmaceuticals

@-http://www.aderis.com/index.asp œProducts šParkinson's Disease šRestless Legs Syndrome šCardiac Imaging šAtrial Fibrillation šWound Healing in Diabetic Foot Ulcers œproduct candidates Rotigotine(SPM-962)`ƒp[ƒLƒ“ƒ\ƒ“•aNDA/RLS(P2) /SchwarzŽÐ’ñŒg Binodenoson(MRE-0470)`S‘Ÿ‹@”\f’f–ò P3 /KingŽÐ’ñŒg Selodenoson(DTI-0009)`R•s®–¬Ü P2 / MRE-0094`“œ”A•a«‘«•”’×ᇎ¡—Öò P1 /KingŽÐ’ñŒg œPress Releases







¡Adolor Corporation[•Ä]

 - http://www.adolor.com/ ;–{ŽÐExton, Pennsylvania
1994@‘n—§
2000@NASDAQãê




œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ 000)20082007200620052004200320022001
ENTEREG”„ã1,248-------[alvimopan]pŒã’°•ÂÇ;FDA³”F08.5A”­”„08.6
Œ_–ñŽû“ü48,2089,12015,08715,71925,54220,727
@‘Žû“ü@Œv49,4569,12015,08715,71925,54220,727
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï52,66441,61056,66049,63148,76656,654
”Ì”„Eˆê”ÊŠÇ—”ï31,11523,97037,68926,29322,87017,648
@(Œo”ïŒv)83,98365,58094,34975,92471,63674,302
‰c‹ÆŠOŽûŽx4,4058,0179,5243,4082,5082,369
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(30,122)(48,443)(69,738)(56,797)(43,586)(51,206)
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]128108
œEntereg(R) (alvimopan)(‘å’°‚¨‚æ‚Ѭ’°ØœpŒã‚Ìã•”‚¨‚æ‚щº•”Á‰»ŠÇ‚̉ñ•œŠúŠÔ’Zk
y2008zNet shipments of ENTEREG through December 31, 2008 were $2.2 million. We recognized net product sales of $1.2 million on shipments to the approximately 185 hospitals that reordered ENTEREG during the year ended December 31, 2008. We have a customer deposit balance of $0.3 million at December 31, 2008. Customer deposits represent net shipments made for which payment has been received from Glaxo, but which have not yet been recognized as product sales revenue. The remaining $0.7 million difference represents product shipments for which payment has not yet been received from Glaxo and for which the conditions of revenue recognition have not been met.
y2007zOpioid analgesics provide pain relief by stimulating opioid receptors located in the central nervous system. There are, however, opioid receptors throughout the body, including the GI tract. By binding to the receptors in the GI tract, opioid analgesics can slow gut motility and disrupt normal GI function that allows for the passage, absorption and excretion of ingested solid materials. This disruption can cause patients to experience significant discomfort and abdominal pain and may result in their reducing or eliminating their pain medication.

Entereg is a small molecule, mu-opioid receptor antagonist intended to block the adverse side effects of opioid analgesics on the GI tract without affecting analgesia. Entereg has been under development for both acute and chronic conditions. The acute indication is for the management of post operative ileus (gPOIh), a GI condition characterized by the slow return of gut function that can result from GI or other surgeries. The chronic indication is for the treatment of opioid bowel dysfunction (gOBDh), which is a condition characterized by a number of GI symptoms, including constipation, that often results from chronic use of opioid analgesics to treat persistent pain conditions.

In April 2002, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Glaxo for the exclusive worldwide development and commercialization of Entereg for certain indications. We are responsible for the development of acute indications, such as POI, and Glaxo is responsible for the development of chronic indications, such as OBD. In the United States, we and Glaxo are co-developing Entereg and intend to share profits that result from the sale of the product. For commercial sales of Entereg for POI in the United States, we would receive 45% and Glaxo would receive 55% of the net sales less certain agreed upon costs, subject to certain adjustments. After the first three years, each partyfs share would become 50%. For commercial sales of Entereg for OBD in the United States, we would receive 35% and Glaxo would receive 65% of the net sales less certain agreed upon costs, subject to certain adjustments. Under the collaboration agreement, we have the right to convert our right to receive a profit share for OBD in the United States to a royalty on net sales of 20%. Outside the United States, Glaxo is responsible for the development and commercialization of Entereg, and we would receive royalties on net sales. We may receive additional milestone payments under the collaboration agreement upon the successful achievement, if any, of certain clinical and regulatory objectives, including up to $40.0 million related to the POI indication and up to $25.0 million related to the OBD indication.

y\¿ŒoˆÜz2004.6 Entereg 12mg capsules‚ÌPOI‚Ì“K‰ž‚ÅFDA‚ÉNDA\¿‚µ‚½(‚S‚‚ÌP3Œ¤‹†‚ÉŠî‚­)B@’ljÁ‚ÌP3‘ÛŽ¡Œ±‚ªŽÀŽ{‚³‚ê2005.4‚ÉFDA‚ɒljÁ\¿B@2005.7ʼn‚Ìapprovable letter‚ðFDA‚©‚çŽó—ÌB@2006.5‚ɉñ“šB@‚Q”Ô–Ú‚Ìapprovable letter‚ð2006.11Žó—ÌA2007.8‚ɉñ“š(OBDгŽÒ‚Ì12ƒ•ŒŽ’·ŠúˆÀ‘S«ŽŽŒ±BƒŠƒXƒNŠÇ—Œv‰æŠÜ‚Þ)B@2008.1 FDA‚ÍGastrointestinal Drug Advisory Committee(GIDAC)‚Æ‹¤‚ÉEntereg‚Ì—LŒø«‚ƈÀ‘S«‚ðR¸B2008.1.23‚ÌGIDAC‚Å‚Íuacceleration of time to upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery following partial large or small bowel resection surgery with primary anastomosisv‚Ì“K‰ž‚ɑ΂µ‚ÄA‘‡ƒxƒlƒtƒBƒbƒg‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚Ä9-6APOI‚Ö‚Ì—LŒø«‚É‚Í13-0(•Û—¯2)AOBDгŽÒ‚Ì12ƒ•ŒŽ’·ŠúˆÀ‘S«ŽŽŒ±‚ÅŠÏŽ@‚³‚ꂽSŠÇŒnƒCƒxƒ“ƒgŠÖ˜A‚ł̌œ”O‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä8-6(•Û—¯1)AƒŠƒXƒNŠÇ—Œv‰æ‚ª•s\•ª‚Ƃ̓_‚É14-0(•Û—¯1)‚Ƃ̌‹‰ÊB

yƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXzGlaxo‚Æ2002.4‚É‘S¢ŠE“ÆèŒ_–ñA2002Q2‚É$50 millionŽó—ÌB@2004Q3(NDA\¿)‚É$10 millionŽó—ÌB@Œ_–ñ‚ł͕đ‚Å‚ÌEntereg‚ÌPOI“K‰ž‚ł̑e—˜‚Ì‚¤‚¿Adolor 45%,Glaxo 55%AOBD‚Å‚ÍAdolor 35%,Glaxo 65%A’A‚µOBD‚Ìprofit share‚ð royalty 20%‚É•ÏX‚·‚錠—˜‚ð•Û—LB
Glaxo‚Í2008.9 –«OBD(ƒIƒsƒIƒCƒh’°ŠÇ‹@”\•s‘S)‚Ì“K‰ž‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚Ä‘S¢ŠE“ÆèŒ_–ñ‚ð‰ðÁB
@alvimopan‚ÍEli Lilly‚ª‘n»‚µA1996.11‚ÉRoberts Laboratories Inc(1999.12 Shire‚É”ƒŽû)‚Ƀ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚µ‚½B Adolor Corporation‚Í1998.6 RobertsŽÐ‚©‚çalvimopan‚Ì‘S¢ŠE“ÆèŒ ‚ðŠl“¾($1.6 million)B@‚±‚ê‚Æ‚͕ʂÉ2002.8 Lilly‚Æ‚àŒ_–ñB

œAdolor Corporation

œProducts ENTEREG(alvimopan)(‘å’°‚¨‚æ‚Ѭ’°ØœpŒã‚Ìã•”‚¨‚æ‚щº•”Á‰»ŠÇ‚̉ñ•œŠúŠÔ’Zk) œRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT œInvestor Insights šNEWS RELEASES šANNUAL REPORTS šSEC FILINGS 10-K Annual report[2009.2.26] - [pdf] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K Annual report[2008.2.29] - [pdf] - [word] - [xls] œPRESS ROOM - NEWS RELEASES Adolor Corporation Provides Update on R&D Programs[2008.12.18] ƒIƒsƒIƒCƒhŽ¡—ÂðŽó‚¯‚Ä‚¢‚銳ŽÒ‚Ì–«’°ŠÇ‹@”\•s‘SiOBDj‚ð‘ÎÛ‚É‚µ‚½ƒAƒ‹ƒrƒ‚ƒpƒ“ ialvimopanj‚ÌX‚È‚éŠJ”­‚Í‚µ‚È‚¢‚Æ”­•\‚µ‚½B ENTEREG(R) (alvimopan) in Postoperative Ileus (POI) ³”F ENTEREG(R) (alvimopan) in Opioid Bowel Dysfunction (OBD) P3’†Ž~ ADL5859(PF-04856880) in DPN P2Š®—¹(Pfizer‚Æ‹¤“¯) ADL5859(PF-04856880) in RA@P2Š®—¹(Pfizer‚Æ‹¤“¯) Adolor Regains Rights to Entereg(R) (alvimopan) for OBD[2008.9.2] Entereg(R) (alvimopan) Available for the Management of Postoperative Ileus[2008.6.9] Adolor and GlaxoSmithKline Announce FDA Approval of Entereg(R) (alvimopan) for the Management of Postoperative Ileus (POI)[2008.5.20]







¡AEterna Zentaris Inc.[Ca]

  ƒJƒiƒ_ÐŠé‹ÆB@]‹Æˆõ”200l(–k•ÄE‰¢B;2002)

šŒn—ñ‰ïŽÐ
Atrium Biotechnologies Inc[ƒJƒiƒ_] 61.76% -http://www.atrium-bio.com/
Zentaris GmbH[GE] -100%




œŒˆŽZ
(Canada $000)  2003     2002     2001
Revenues       166,413  101,204   43,777
Operating loss (14,283) (20,566) (17,754)
Loss before
 income taxes  (18,546) (18,190) (14,844)
Net loss
 for the year  (28,147) (25,782)  (3,469)

œƒZƒOƒƒ“ƒg•Ê”„ã‚
(Canada $ 000)      2003      2002         2001
Biopharmaceutical    46,106       315         -
Cosmetics&nutrition  15,291    13,386     11,367
Distribution        105,526    87,859     32,629
˜AŒ‹’²®               (510)     (356)      (219)
  Žû“ü@‡Œv        166,413   101,204     43,777



œAEterna Zentaris Inc.

œProducts on the market œInvestors šFinancials œNews Room *Zentaris GmbH[GE]
œZentaris GmbH[GE]

- http://www.zentaris.de/ - ‹Œ Asta Medica AG‚©‚ç2001”N•ªŽÐ 2003 Zentaris AG‚Æ AEterna GmbH‚ª‡•¹‚µAZentaris GmbH‚ɂȂÁ‚½B 2004.6 e‰ïŽÐDegussa AG‚ªZentaris GmbH‚ðAEterna Labs‚É”„‹pB ƒoƒCƒIˆã–òŠé‹ÆAEterna Laboratories Inc.[ƒJƒiƒ_]‚Ì100%Žq‰ïŽÐB ¨Œ»¡AEterna Zentaris Inc.[Ca] AEterna Laboratories Holds 2004 Annual Shareholder Meeting and Announces Company Name Change to Aterna Zentaris[2004.5.26] - AEterna Lab‚ªAterna Zentaris Inc.‚ɎЖ¼•ÏXB@100%Žq‰ïŽÐ‚Æ‚µ‚ÄZentaris GmbH[GE]‚ðŽP‰º‚ÉŽ‚ÂB @“ú–{‚Å‚ÍA‰––ì‹`»–ò‚Ƀ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX•i–Ú‚ ‚èB œNews & Facts šPress Releases AEterna acquires German biopharmaceutical Zentaris from Degussa[2004.6.1] Degussa sells Zentaris. Divestment of the former ASTA Medica now completed[2004.6.1] - ”„‹p‰¿Ši‚ÍEur 50million;@Degussa AG‚ÍAAWD pharma[Arzneimittel Dresden]‚ðPliva‚É”„‹p(2001.6)A Žîᇎ–‹Æ‚ðBaxter‚É”„‹p(2001.8)AViatris‚ðAdvent‚É”„‹p(2002.5)B Zentaris AG‚ÍA]‹Æˆõ”70lA”„ã‚EUR 21 million(2002)AÝ—§2001”NB œProducts, projects, services




¡Affymax, Inc.

 - http://www.affymax.com/ ;–{ŽÐPalo Alto, CA ; NASDAQ=

2001.8  ƒxƒ“ƒ`ƒƒ[”ŽÐ‚ª‡“¯‚ÅÝ—§B@GlaxoSmithKline‚©‚ç‚Ìa spin-out 
2008––Œ»ÝHematide‚ÌŠJ”­‚ÉW’†BŒ»ÝP3(–«t•s‘S‚É‚æ‚é•nŒŒA‰»Šw—Ö@‚É‚æ‚é•nŒŒ)



œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ 000)20082007200620052004200320022001
’ñŒgŽû“ü82,16244,30311,688----
ƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXEƒƒCƒ„ƒŠƒeƒB689333874151225103
(Žû“ü‡Œv)82,85144,33611,72674151225103
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï137,49269,39854,34724,05117,33813,66016,834
‰c‹ÆŒo”ï@Œv171,58293,47365,43634,08322,26928,94428,448
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v(88,731)(49,137)(53,710)(34,009)(22,118)(28,719)(28,345)
Œoí—˜‰v(86,228)(37,712)(48,288)(32,576)(21,398)
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(86,510)(43,069)(48,288)(32,576)(21,398)(28,197)(28,046)
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]147
š•“c–ò•i‚Ƃ̒ñŒg

In February 2006, we issued an exclusive license to Takeda for the development and commercialization of Hematide in Japan. Pursuant to this agreement, Takeda has paid us approximately $37 million to date, consisting of $17 million in upfront license fees, $10 million in milestone payments, and approximately $10 million for the purchase of 530,082 shares of our Series E Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $18.86 per share, which we determined was at fair value. In addition, we are eligible to receive additional clinical and regulatory milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $65 million upon Takeda's successful achievement of clinical development and regulatory milestones in Japan. Takeda is responsible for all development and commercialization costs in Japan and will purchase API for Hematide from us. Assuming Hematide is approved and launched in Japan, we will receive a royalty from Takeda on Hematide sales in Japan.

In June 2006, we expanded our collaboration to develop and commercialize Hematide worldwide, which includes the co-development and co-commercialization of Hematide in the U.S. Takeda received an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Hematide outside of the U.S. Beginning January 1, 2007, Takeda will bear the first $50 million of third-party expenses related to development in pursuit of U.S. regulatory approval of Hematide. Thereafter, Takeda will bear 70% of the third-party U.S. development expenses, while we are responsible for 30% of the expenses. Each company retains responsibility for 100% of its internal development expenses. Under the June 2006 agreement, Takeda paid us an upfront license fee of $105 million, and we are eligible to receive from Takeda up to an aggregate of $280 million upon the successful achievement of clinical development and regulatory milestones. Further, we may receive from Takeda up to an aggregate of $150 million upon the achievement of certain worldwide annual net sales milestones. We and Takeda will share equally in the net profits and losses of Hematide in the U.S., which include expenses related to the marketing and launch of Hematide. Takeda will pay us a variable royalty based on annual net sales of Hematide outside the U.S. The agreement establishes a joint steering committee to oversee the development, regulatory approval and commercialization of Hematide.

We will share responsibility with Takeda for clinical development activities required for U.S. regulatory approval of Hematide. Specifically, we have primary responsibility for Hematide's clinical development plan and clinical trials in the dialysis and pre-dialysis indications, while Takeda has primary responsibility in the chemotherapy induced anemia and anemia of cancer indications. We are responsible for U.S. regulatory filings in the dialysis, pre-dialysis, chemotherapy induced anemia and anemia of cancer indications, including holding the NDAs for those indications. Takeda is responsible for regulatory filings outside the U.S. and the creation of a global safety database.

We are also responsible for the manufacture and supply of all quantities of API to be used in the development and commercialization of Hematide worldwide. Takeda is responsible for the fill and finish steps in the manufacture of Hematide worldwide.

We have agreed to jointly develop the initial commercial marketing plan for Hematide in the U.S. pursuant to which we and Takeda will divide Hematide promotional responsibilities in the U.S. We and Takeda will jointly decide on promotional responsibility for markets outside of these initial indications.

Under the February 2006 agreement, Takeda also obtained a right of first negotiation to any backup products for Hematide developed by us or our third-party partners. Specifically, during the first ten years of the agreement, if we or our third-party partners develop a product that advances to Phase 2 clinical trials and competes with Hematide in the renal or oncology indications, we are obligated to offer to Takeda the right to develop and commercialize such product in Japan before offering the product opportunity in Japan to any other third party.

We have recognized $11.7 million of revenue under our Arrangement with Takeda during the year ended December 31, 2006. In December 2006, Takeda completed a Phase 1 trial of Hematide in Japan resulting in the payment in January 2007 to us of a $10 million milestone under the collaboration.

š•nŒŒ—p@EPOŽsê

IMS Health„Œv‚É‚æ‚邯A2008”N“xrEPO»Ü‚Í¢ŠE‚Å$11.5 billionA•Ä‘$6.8 billionB@•Ä‘Žå—v»•i‚ÍPROCRIT[J&J]‚¨‚æ‚ÑAranesp and EPOGEN[Amgen]
Aranesp, introduced in 2001, has significant market share, particularly in the oncology market. In late 2005, U.S. quarterly sales of Aranesp surpassed those of PROCRIT. Aranesp is approved for once-monthly dosing for treatment of anemia in pre-dialysis patients in Europe. In the U.S., Amgen reportedly is in the process of seeking approval for once-monthly dosing of Aranesp for treatment of anemia in pre-dialysis patients. In 2005, Amgen submitted a biologics license supplement to include a once-monthly dosing regimen for pre-dialysis patients in the label for Aranesp. In October 2006, the FDA responded to Amgen's filing with a request for additional clinical data for the once-monthly dosing regimen, including an additional clinical study.

Roche has obtained regulatory approval to market and has launched a PEGylated ESA, called Mircera, in Europe. Mircera reportedly has greater plasma stability than any of the currently marketed products. PEG is a polymer that increases the time rEPO remains in the circulation and consequently can be dosed less frequently. Mircera has also obtained regulatory approval in the U.S., but as a result of Roche and Amgen's patent infringement litigation, Mircera has been found to infringe several U.S. patents owned by Amgen and has been enjoined from being sold in the U.S. until the expiration of these patents in 2013. If Mircera enters the U.S. markets before Hematide or upon its entry, we believe that Mircera will be in direct competition with Hematide, and therefore could potentially limit the market for Hematide, because of its ability to be longer acting than currently marketed ESAs in the U.S. In addition to marketed ESAs, there are several ESA product candidates in various stages of active development, including small molecules, by a potential competitor, FibroGen, Inc., that may promote the production of naturally-occurring EPO in patients. In addition, Merck recently announced plans to develop its own version of EPO in yeast cells instead of mammalian cells which, if successful, may permit Merck to launch its product prior to the expiration of Amgen's U.S. patents.

In addition, several biosimilar versions of short-acting rEPO have recently been launched or are expected to launch in Europe in the near term. Biosimilar EPOGEN products are generally not expected to enter the U.S. market until 2013, when the last patent in Amgen's U.S. EPO patent estate expires.

According to IMS Health Incorporated, recombinant EPO, or rEPO, generated $13 billion in worldwide revenues for 12 months ended June 2006, of which we believe approximately $9 billion was generated in the U.S. Of this $9 billion, we estimate that approximately $3 billion is attributable to use of rEPO in patients on dialysis, and the remaining $6 billion is attributable to other indications, including oncology and use in predialysis patients. Despite the success of rEPO, we believe that worldwide markets for predialysis and cancer are underserved. Currently marketed rEPO is typically given up to three times per week to dialysis patients, and every one to three weeks to oncology patients. We believe the requirement for relatively frequent dosing has historically limited the use of these ESAs in predialysis and oncology treatment settings and that Hematide, with less frequent dosing, has the potential to expand these markets. While the dialysis market is currently well penetrated, we believe Hematide has the potential to offer reduced operational cost and complexity for healthcare providers compared to currently marketed ESAs

šAnemia Background

Anemia, a condition in which the blood is deficient in red blood cells and hemoglobin, is a frequent and serious complication associated with a number of common chronic diseases. Anemia is associated with chronic fatigue and, if left untreated, may increase the risk of other diseases or even death. Red blood cells are normally formed in the circulating blood from progenitor cells, known as stem cells, and from precursor cells which are initially present primarily in the bone marrow. These cells are stimulated to divide and differentiate and are mobilized into circulation by EPO, a hormonal factor produced by the kidney. EPO acts by binding to and activating the EPO receptor on precursor cells. The activation of the EPO receptor stimulates the proliferation and maturation of the precursor cells to form red blood cells that contain hemoglobin. Hemoglobin is an iron-containing protein in red blood cells that functions primarily in the transport of oxygen to, and carbon dioxide from, the tissues of the body. Anemia can be caused by conditions such as chronic kidney disease, or treatments such as chemotherapy, that result in underproduction of EPO or a muted response to EPO.

Anemia generally exists in men when the hemoglobin level in blood, which is a measure of red blood cells, is less than 12 g/dL, or the hematocrit, which is a ratio of the volume packed red blood cells to the volume of whole blood, is less than 37%, and in women when hemoglobin is less than 11 g/dL or hematocrit is less than 33%. The FDA, the medical community and others have recently raised significant safety concerns relating to currently marketed ESAs as a result of reports of increased mortality and side effects from a number of clinical trials. Some of these safety concerns relate to targeting and maintaining high hemoglobin levels for extended periods of time. The FDA recently required revised warnings, including black box warnings, be added to labels of currently marketed ESAs advising physicians to monitor hemoglobin levels and to use the lowest dose of ESA to increase the hemoglobin concentration to the lowest level sufficient to avoid the need for red blood cell transfusions. Black box warnings for currently marketed ESAs also note increased risk of death and serious cardiovascular events when administered to target a hemoglobin of greater than 12 g/dL.

šAnemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease. One of the most common forms of chronic anemia is that which occurs in patients with chronic kidney disease. According to the American Journal of Kidney Disease, chronic kidney disease affects as many as 19 million Americans. As kidney function deteriorates due to the underlying disease, the ability of the kidney to produce adequate EPO is impaired, resulting in decreased production of new red blood cells and anemia.

Over time, chronic kidney disease usually progresses to irreversible end-stage renal disease, the most severe stage of the disease. End-stage renal disease patients require either lifetime dependence on renal dialysis, a medical procedure in which blood is cleansed of impurities, or a kidney transplant. Patients with end-stage renal disease are nearly always moderately to severely anemic unless treated with an ESA like rEPO. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, there are approximately 320,000 end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis in the U.S. served by approximately 4,700 dialysis facilities. Funding and reimbursement for this care are predominately through the Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Program. In 2005, according to the CMS, reimbursement for many drugs, including ESAs, was at a rate of 106% of the average ESA sales price. This allows the dialysis facilities to realize a profit on the purchase and administration of ESAs, which constitutes an important component of their economic viability. IMS Health estimates that the U.S. sales of EPOGEN, the dominant therapy for anemia in dialysis patients, totaled $2.9 billion for the 12 months ended June 2006.

We estimate that approximately two-thirds of pre-dialysis patients with anemia are not treated with an ESA prior to progression to stage 5, end-stage renal disease, and initiating dialysis. While in the U.S., currently marketed ESAs are indicated for up to every two week dosing in predialysis, these patients often require much less frequent visits to their nephrologists or primary care physicians for treatment of their underlying disease. Because of the incongruity between the optimal dose scheduling of these ESAs and the timing of predialysis patient office visits, we believe that the predialysis market for ESAs is underserved by existing therapy and could be better served with a product that can be dosed once every four weeks.

šAnemia associated with Cancer. Anemia in cancer patients may be caused by chemotherapy or the cancer itself. For patients undergoing chemotherapy, the destruction of progenitor stem cells and precursor cells in the bone marrow by chemotherapy often leads to anemia. Severe fatigue associated with anemia affects approximately three-fourths of all cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. In some cancer patients, such as those with multiple myeloma and acute leukemia, the underlying cancer itself causes anemia. In these patients, the production of and responsiveness to EPO is believed to be reduced by molecules known as cytokines that are produced by or in response to tumors. An oncologist's ability to treat a patient's cancer is often limited by the patient's ability to tolerate the side effects, including anemia, of highly toxic courses of chemotherapy. Better management of chemotherapy induced anemia could lead to better dose optimization of chemotherapy in cancer patients.

The FDA has recently issued a public health advisory re-evaluating the safe use of the ESA class and is scheduled to convene its Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) in May 2007 to consider the mechanism of action of ESAs and to review the effects of ESAs on survival and tumor progression in cancer patients. Use of ESAs has been associated with shortened time to tumor progression in certain patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Increased risk of death has been reported when ESAs are administered to target a hemoglobin of 12 g/dL in patients with active malignant disease receiving neither chemotherapy nor radiation therapy, a population for which ESAs are not approved or indicated.

Based on our marketing research, there are approximately 3 million actively treated cancer patients in the U.S. Of those patients, roughly 1.2 million undergo chemotherapy to treat their cancer. About 65% of chemotherapy patients become anemic, with 47% of those receiving ESA therapy. Further, based on the January to June 2005 Tandem cancer audit, over 90% of chemotherapy patients receive chemotherapy treatment in three or four week cycles or less frequently, yet the most prevalent dosing intervals of current ESAs for cancer patients are every one to two weeks. We believe that a less frequent, more convenient dosing regimen, every three to four weeks to coincide with chemotherapy, may increase market penetration and expand use of ESAs for oncology patients.

Anemia associated with Other Conditions. Anemia can also occur in any person with a chronic disease that causes significant inflammation, infection, or bleeding, such as rheumatoid arthritis or cardiovascular disease, and it can therefore be considered a characteristic disease of the elderly. We are testing Hematide in chronic kidney disease and cancer, but are not currently testing Hematide's effectiveness in treating anemia in other conditions.

šCurrent Therapy and Limitations

According to IMS Health, rEPO generated $13 billion in worldwide revenue for the 12 months ended June 2006, of which approximately $9 billion was generated in the U.S. Of the $9 billion in U.S. revenue, we estimate that $3 billion is attributable to use for dialysis patients, and the remaining $6 billion is attributable to other indications, including use in oncology and predialysis patients. ESAs, in the form of rEPO variants, have been used successfully to manage the anemia of dialysis, predialysis and cancer patients. rEPOs are similar, but not necessarily identical, to a patient's naturally occurring EPO. Differences exist among rEPOs with regard to composition and structure. As a result, differences may also exist among rEPOs with regard to frequency of dosing, duration of effect and rate of rise in hemoglobin. Stability in the blood and circulating half-life, which measure the time it takes the compound to disappear from the blood, generally correlate with less frequent dosing. One of our objectives is to develop a product with a duration of effect that results in a well-controlled hemoglobin response while still allowing optimal dosing, ideally once every four weeks.

Since its initial U.S. market introduction in 1989, rEPO has revolutionized the treatment of patients with anemia resulting from chronic diseases. To date, the therapeutic options have not progressed significantly beyond the relatively short-acting and inconvenient recombinant protein products currently on the market. Further, the majority of products in development are variations of the existing products on the market.

Two current types of ESAs, epoetin alfa and epoetin beta, are biologically engineered hormones produced in mammalian cells by recombinant DNA technology. Both are relatively short-acting forms of rEPO that typically require frequent dosing to obtain a sustained correction of anemia. Darbepoetin alfa, which is marketed by Amgen, Inc., or Amgen, under the trade name Aranesp, is a biologically engineered hormone product closely related to and functionally similar to epoetin alfa. However, darbepoetin alfa has a terminal half-life approximately three times longer than epoetin alfa, as a result of the addition of sialic acid to stabilize the protein. The currently available rEPOs are marketed under a variety of trade names in different territories.

šFrequency of Dosing. Currently marketed ESAs are hampered by short duration of effect resulting in the need for frequent dosing. We believe that the need for frequent dosing has limited the use of ESAs in treatment settings such as predialysis, where patient visits for the purpose of treating underlying disease are less frequent than for patients undergoing dialysis multiple times per week. The population of predialysis chronic kidney disease patients who may benefit from anemia management far outnumbers the population of patients who have reached end-stage renal disease. We believe the requirement for relatively frequent dosing has historically limited the use of ESAs in predialysis and oncology treatment settings and that, with its longer acting profile, Hematide has the potential to expand these markets. In the oncology setting, anemia management often involves administration of ESAs more frequently than typical chemotherapy regimens, which usually require treatment every three to four weeks. Although existing ESAs are sometimes given in larger doses in an effort to achieve extended dosing, and despite studies by the manufacturers of these ESAs aimed at extending the dose interval of these products, medical record audit data and oncologist survey response indicate that existing ESAs are still administered to chemotherapy patients once a week to once every two weeks on average. In addition, recent studies by manufacturers of ESAs indicate that the higher levels of hemoglobin associated with larger and more frequent doses result in a statistically significant increase in cardiovascular events. For these reasons, we believe that an ESA designed for every four weeks administration could expand the market opportunity for anemia management therapies in the oncology setting.

šPure Red Cell Aplasia(ԉ苅á”;ƒÔŒŒ‹…–³Œ`¬Ç). Treatment of patients with rEPO has been shown in rare cases to cause the production of antibodies to both rEPO and naturally-occurring EPO. Typically these antibodies can bind to and neutralize both the rEPO drug and any naturally-occurring EPO in a patient's system. As a result, such patients become increasingly less sensitive to rEPO therapy and can develop a form of anemia called Pure Red Cell Aplasia, or PRCA. This hematological disorder is characterized by severe, transfusion-dependent anemia, a scarcity of reticulocytes and an almost complete absence of red blood cell precursors in otherwise normal bone marrow. Recently, the FDA has required marketers of rEPO in the U.S. to include in their product prescribing information warnings of potential for rEPO induced PRCA and a description of this adverse reaction. We believe that an ESA that does not cause PRCA and that can be used to treat PRCA will have advantages in the marketplace over rEPOs that can cause PRCA.

šPotential Hematide Advantages

Hematide is a relatively small synthetic peptide-based ESA which we are developing for the treatment of anemia in dialysis, predialysis, PRCA and cancer patients. Peptides are composed of amino acids, commonly known as the building blocks of proteins. Typically, a peptide is composed of fewer than 50 amino acids, while a protein contains from 50 to well over 5,000 amino acids. Peptide-based therapeutics may display certain advantages compared to recombinant proteins, including simplicity and cost of manufacture, and specificity of effect. Further, because they are composed of naturally-occurring amino acids, peptide-based therapeutics theoretically also carry the general advantage of reduced toxicity relative to small molecule drugs. In the past, development of peptide-based drug candidates was often slowed by low potency. A second problem historically associated with peptide-based drugs has been a requirement of frequent dosing in vivo. More recently, however, it has been possible to develop peptide-based drugs with potencies nearly equivalent to recombinant proteins and with less frequent dosing requirements.

Through the use of our technology, we have designed Hematide to require less frequent dosing than currently marketed ESAs. We believe that Hematide's properties are superior to the properties of rEPO drugs currently on the market, particularly in terms of required frequency of administration. As a long-acting ESA, we believe that Hematide may overcome many of the patient care limitations of currently marketed rEPOs. We believe that flexibility of dosing based on duration of effect will allow many patients to receive anemia management therapy concurrently with therapy for their underlying disease.

Hematide is being developed for room temperature stability, ease-of-handling and long shelf life in order to overcome many of the limitations which hamper the cost effectiveness, and thus the physician adoption, of rEPOs.

Our early clinical trials have shown similar positive effects on red blood cell formation when Hematide is given at equivalent doses either intravenously or subcutaneously. These results suggest that Hematide may be equally effective in humans when administered by either route. Additional clinical trials are underway to confirm this observation. We believe it may be easier to use Hematide than some forms of rEPO, which often have different clinical effects when given subcutaneously versus intravenously.

Although Hematide has the erythropoietic activity characteristic of naturally occurring EPO, its amino acid sequence is unrelated to EPO, rEPO or any other known naturally-occurring erythropoietic protein. Because Hematide does not appear to display immunologic cross-reactivity to naturally-occurring EPO, we believe that Hematide will not cause PRCA. We have conducted preclinical studies which have demonstrated that Hematide can stimulate reticulocytes and elevate hemoglobin levels in animal models of EPO antibody mediated PRCA. An ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of Hematide in a small number of patients with PRCA has shown supportive results to date. These results suggest that Hematide is not neutralized by antibodies to rEPO and thus may be effective in rescuing patients that have developed PRCA.

Based on preclinical and clinical studies to date, we believe that the risk of developing antibodies to Hematide will be low. Thus far, we have observed that Hematide-induced antibodies do not appear to cross-react with rEPO and do not have any apparent effect on clinical response to the drug.






œAffymax, Inc.

œHematide(TM) (a synthetic peptide-based erythropoiesis stimulating agent, or ESA, designed to stimulate production of red blood cells. Hematide is designed to be less frequently dosed than currently marketed ESAs, and therefore has the potential to offer both better care for patients and reduced cost and complexity for healthcare providers) P3 the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure P2 for the treatment of anemia in cancer patients ‘O—Õ°@ analogs for tissue protection œR & D ¡INVESTORS œPress Releases œAnnual Reports œSEC Filings 10-K annual report[2009.3.12] 10-K annual report[2008.3.13] 10-K annual report[2007.4.2]




¡Akorn, Inc.

 - http://www.akorn.com/ ; Šá‰È–ò“™‚Ìê–åƒ[ƒJ[
@ Akorn Manufacturing Inc.‚ÍŽq‰ïŽÐ
1971 ‘n—§AAbita Springs, Louisiana‚É‚ÄB

droperidol(Inapsine[Akorn])‚ð”Ì”„

œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($000)20062005200420032002200120001999

Žû“ü71,25044,48450,708(+12)45,49151,41941,54566,22164,632
‘e—˜‰v26,88014,94418,202(+50)12,14820,5376,39828,13133,477
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v-4,905-7,479-368-6,276-3,565-21,074-1,73112,122
Œoí—˜‰v-5,960-8,592-3,018-12,496-6,713-24,926-4,01410,639
ƒ—˜‰v-5,963-8,609-3,026-12,325-12,952-15,146-2,4146,670

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï11,7974,5101,8611,4651,8862,598
]‹Æˆõ”371
œƒZƒOƒƒ“ƒg•Ê”„ã‚
($000)20062005200420032002200120001999

Žû“ü71,25044,48450,70845,49151,41941,54566,22164,632

@Šá‰È—p»•i19,52822,65929,81226,05629,57916,936
@’ŽË—p»•i42,48913,71912,34112,15512,9779,663
@Žó‘õ»‘¢9,2338,1068,5557,2808,86314,946
œŒ¤‹†ŠJ”­ [2006]
In 2006, we received 11 ANDA product approvals from the Office of Generic Drugs. As of December 31, 2006, we had 35 ANDA product submissions for generic pharmaceuticals under review at the Office of Generic Drugs: 16 from internal development and 19 from various strategic agreements with nine external partners. In most, but not all, instances we own the ANDAs that are produced by our strategic partnerships. We plan to continue to file ANDAs on a regular basis as pharmaceutical products come off patent allowing us to compete by marketing generic equivalents. See gGovernment Regulationh beginning on page seven.



œAkorn, Inc.

œInvestor Relations šOverview šNews Releases Akorn, Inc. Reports Net Sales of $12.6 Million in 2004 Fourth Quarter with
Gross Margin of 33% and EBITDA of $1.0 Million
[2005.2.28] šSEC Filings 10-K[2007.3.16] - [pdf] 10-K[2004.3.30]




¡AKZO Novel

Akzo Nobel's Pharma Group ‚ÍOrganon‚ð’†S‚ÉA2002”N“x”„ã Euro 140‰­(–ñ1’›7374
‰­‰~)A80‚©‘‚É]‹Æˆõ67,000lB
@Ž–‹Æ•ʂłÍAˆã–ò EUR 40‰­, Coatings EUR 55‰­, and ‰»Šw•i EUR 46‰­.
Akzo Nobel Announces Intended Sale of Organon BioSciences to Schering-Plough[2007.3.12]
 - Š®‘SŽq‰ïŽÐOrganon BioSciences N.V. (OBS)‚ðSchering-Plough‚ÉEUR 11 billion‚Å”„‹pB
Akzo Nobel Confirms OBS Sale on Schedule[2007.10.11]
 - European Commission‚ª”F‰Â‚µ‚½B



œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚[IFRS]13,737(+6)13,00012,83313,10614,05914,15814,069
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v[IFRS]1,4621,4861,5271,0641,3621,1981,487
ƒ—˜‰v[IFRS]1,153(+20)961945602818671947

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï885810807
‹Œ823
887
‚¤‚¿Organon484[18.6%]433[17.9%]395[17%]
‰ïŒvˆ—‚ÍA-2003–˜NL GAAP,2004-ˆÈ~‚ÍIFRS œŽ–‹Æ•Ê”„ã‚
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚13,737(+6)13,00012,68813,051

Ornanon2,611(+8)2,4252,344
Intervet1,125(+3)1,0941,027
@ˆã–ò3,2463,600
‹Œ3,550
4,0614,085
Coating6,209(+12)5,5555,2375,162
‹Œ5,144
5,4445,522
‰»Šw•i3,809(-2)3,8904,317
‹Œ4,192
4,473
‹Œ4,347
4,6794,680
‚»‚Ì‘¼-17361410
‡Œv13,737(+6)13,00012,833
œŽ–‹Æ•Ê]‹Æˆõ”
(l)2006200520042003200220012000

]‹Æˆõ”61,88061,34061,450
‹Œ61,400
64,600

@Organon13,71014,10014,09015,500
@INTERVET5,3705,2605,2705,200
@ˆã–ò20,00021,300
Coating31,66029,20028,86029,300
‰»Šw•i9,68011,43011,890
‹Œ13,600
14,400
‹Œ14,500
@‚»‚Ì‘¼1,4601,3501,340
‹Œ1,100
1,200
Œv61,88061,34061,450
‹Œ63,600
66,400
œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ`ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ•”–å
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚3,7363,5193,2463,5504,0443,8392,865
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v354+219415+238522692768831765
EBITDA475+278541+292690868948995932

]‹Æˆõ”19,08019,36020,00021,30021,70021,00021,200
2005”N“xˆÈ~‚ÍOrganon‚ÆIntervet‚ð‡ŽZ œ»–òŽ–‹Æ•”–å[Pharm]
(Euro milllion)20062005200420032002200120001999”õl

Organon2,611(+8)2,4252,344
‹Œ2,010
2,2792,5932,5041,980(+49%)1,620PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
Intervet1,125(+3)1,0941,027
‹Œ1,024
1,0101,0811,0961,020(+26%)515VETERINARY PRODUCTS
Diosynth--366479529488380(+9%)335ACTIVE INGREDIENTS FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Organon Teknika------555(+14%)530HOSPITAL SUPPLIES
CHEFARO------85(+2%)90NONPRESCRIPTION PRODUCTS

Pharm. Total3,7363,5193,2463,5504,0084,0443,839(+34%)2,865
1) Chefalo - 2001‰‚߂ɔ„‹p 2) Organon Teknika‚Ìf’f–ò•”–å‚ÍAbioMerieux‚É”„‹pB<2000> Organon&Organon Tekn ikaŒv‚ÍA2,254‚ÉC³‚³‚ꂽB@Organon&Organon Teknika‚ÍA2001.5.1“‡B 3) ˆã–òŒ´—¿ƒ[ƒJ[DiosynthŽÐ‚Í2005.1‚ÉOrganonŽÐ‚É“‡ œ»•i•Ê”„ã
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000”õl
• Contraception669(+18)564(+8)522(+4)517(+7)521(-3)540(+10%)492(+20%)
‚¤‚¿NuvaRing213(+67)127(+57)81(+115)----[Etonogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol Vaginal Ring]”ð”DƒŠƒ“ƒO
Marvelon/Mercilon/Mircette-390(-12)431(+6)???-[desogestrel/ethinylestradiol](oral contraceptives)
• Hormone Replacement Therapy-330(+5)314(+11%)
Livial151(-2)154(-4)160(-17)197(-1)208(+12)186(+20%)155(+40%)[tibolone](hormone replacement)¢ŠE90ƒ•‘
• Infertility-402(+5)384(+10%)--
Puregon/Follistim384(+8)355(+20)285(-11)331(-1)356(+8)329(+17%)282[follitropin beta](infertility product)
• Depression-800(+11)720(+39%)--
Remeron253(-11)283(-22)363524717(+14)627(+51%)414(+58%)[mirtazapine](antidepressant)
•Ä‘47(-75)208(-45)
•Ä‘ŠO316(-)316(+26)
• Hospital pharmaceuticals*-282(+3)272(-2%)
Pharmaceutical ingredients255(+2)228(+8)
Anesthesia242(+28)[]
šImplanon -the innovative contraceptive implant [2006] •Ä‘FDA³”FA”­”„2006 Late šNuvaRing [2006] Etopped the 1.5 million user mark worldwide Ealso approved for the Australian market. 32ƒ•‘–Ú šAnesthesia revenues [2006] Anesthesia revenues grew 27%, boosted by muscle relaxant Esmeron(R) and the injectable Anzemet(R), for post-operative nausea and vomiting. Anzemet(R), which is licensed in by Organon from sanofi-aventis for the United States only, added to the already strong anesthesia franchise in the United States. šRoyalties and services revenues [2006] were mainly attributable to royalty payments from Janssen on RisperdalR sales in selected countries and from GlaxoSmithKline on sales from Arixtra(R). Service revenues were received mainly from Ligand, with whom our co-promotional collaboration on Avinza(R) was ended by the end of September 2006, although the royalty income from the product will remain for a number of years. ¡Pipeline /2007.6
ProjectApplicationPhaseDescription
œGynecology
Org 50081Serotonin -2-Blocker (hot flushes)III
NOMAC/E2Oral contraceptive in-licensed from Theramex (Merck KGaA)III
Org 39970AndrogenII
œFertility
Org 36286Sustained Follicle Stimulant(corifollitropin alpha)III
œNeuroscience
asenapinedopamine/serotonin antagonistIII
Org 50081Serotonin-2-Blocker (insomnia)III
farampatorAMPAkineII
Org 34517GR antagonistII
Org 25935GlyT1 inhibitorII
œAnesthesia
sugammadexSelective muscle relaxant binding agentIII
œOther
Org 42675Antithrombotic dual inhibitor II/XII
from Form 20F 2006[pdf,239p;2006.6.22] p25 Currently, 39 compounds are in various stages of the development pipeline: 23 in pre-clinical development, 7 in Phase I clinical development, and 4 in Phase II clinical development, of which two are in advanced stages of Phase II developmen t. Five products are in Phase III clinical development. œAnnual Report 2003 -General[pdf,55p] - 53pš[Products and Markets - Pharma]Main human healthcare products in the pipeline (Phase II and later)
ProjectApplicationPhaseLaunchDescription
Org 33628ContraceptiveII(progesteron receptor modulator)
"Male pill"contraceptiveII>2005(androgen/progestagen combination)
FSH-CTPinfertilityII@long-acting FSH
Livial 1.25mgHT/osteoporosisIII@Selective tissue estrogenic activity regulator (STEAR); ‹KŠi’ljÁ
Variza(R)
depressionfiled@5HT-1A partial agonist
Asenapine/Org 5222psychosisIII2005DA/5HT-antagonist
Org 24448psychosisII@AMPAKINE
Org 34517/34850depressionII@HPA axis modulator
Org 4420sleepII@NASSA
Org 25969AnesthesiaII@muscle relaxant binding agent
Org 37663immunologyII@anti-inflammatory steroid
Org 39141immunologyII@auto-antigen
œI—¹•ª
NuvaringRcontraceptive ringapproved2002”­”„
Implanon[R]contraceptive implantmarket2000(Europe)@
III2002/3(USA)@
Puregon Pen.infertilitylaunched2001 (Europe)@
\¿2003 (USA)@
Xyvion. osteoporosisIII2004 (USA)
AndriolR Testocaps.male HRTIII2002 (Europe)
\¿2004 (USA)
Org 34517depressionII2006
Arixtrathrombosismarket2002 (USA)
filed2002 (Europe)
SanOrg 34006thrombosisIII>2005
Org 39141rheumatoid arthritisII2007
œAKZO Novel

Akzo Nobel Announces Intended Sale of Organon BioSciences to Schering-Plough[2007.3.12] - Š®‘SŽq‰ïŽÐOrganon BioSciences N.V. (OBS)‚ðSchering-Plough‚ÉEUR 11 billion‚Å”„‹pB Akzo Nobel Confirms OBS Sale on Schedule[2007.10.11] - European Commission‚ª”F‰Â‚µ‚½B œHealthcare šHealthcare Activities šProducts š[Business] Organon œNews & Media - News‚ÆPressRelease‚̈Ⴂ‚ÍžB–†‚¾‚ªAd•¡‚͂Ȃ¢‚Ì‚ÅA‘o•ûCheck—v šNews & Features --ŋ߂̂à‚Ì‚¾‚¯ Pressroom -PressRelease - ŠúŠÔE•”–åŽw’茟õ(ÅVŠÜ‚Þ) Pressroom -News Stories - ŠúŠÔE•”–åŽw’茟õ(ÅVŠÜ‚Þ) šReports & Presentation`ŒˆŽZŽ‘—¿ ¡Investor Relations œNews & Publications œFinancial Press Releases šReports & Presentation`ŒˆŽZŽ‘—¿ Form 20F 2006[pdf,239p;2006.6.22] Form 20F 2005[pdf,210p;2006.6.26] œAnnual Report Annual Report 2007[pdf,p,2008.2.19] Annual Report 2006[pdf,136p,2007.3.14] Annual Report 2005[pdf,2006.2.28] Annual Report 2004 Annual Report 2003 Annual Report 2002 œFinancial Overview
œN.V. Organon

--- http://www.organon.com/ ¡News ¡Product œGynecology - www.orgyn.com šContraception - www.contraception.net NuvaRing(R) (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol) Cerazette(R)(desogestrel) Gracial(R)(desogestrel / ethinylestradiol) -22-day combiphasic Implanon(R)(etonogestrel) -a single-rod contraceptive implant Laurina(R)(desogestrel / ethinylestradiol) Marvelon(R) / Desogen(R)(desogestrel / ethinylestradiol) Mercilon(R) / Mircette(R)(desogestrel / ethinylestradiol) šHormone Therapy - Managing the menopause Livial(R)(tibolone) - http://www.livial.com/ Ovestin(R)(estriol) Riselle(R)(17s-estradiol implant) Andriol(R)(testosterone undecanoate) - http://www.andriol.com/ œFeretility - http://www.fertilityjourney.com/ Orgalutran(R)(ganirelix) - reduces IVF (in-vitro fertilization) treatment time Pregnyl(R)(human chorionic gonadotropin) since 1932 Puregon(R) / Follistim(R) (follitropin beta) since 1996 - http://www.puregon.com/ œNeuroscience - Mental Health œAnesthesia
œ“ú–{ƒIƒ‹ƒKƒmƒ“

- http://www.organon.jp/ œƒvƒŒƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX uOCƒP[ƒ^ƒCî•ñvƒTƒCƒgŠĴ݂¨’m‚点[2005.11.9] ’á—p—ÊŒoŒû”ð”DÜuƒ}[ƒxƒƒ“(R)21v”­”„‚Ì‚¨’m‚点[2005.4.19] - ƒ}[ƒxƒƒ“(R)21‚Í20”NˆÈã‘O‚ɉ¢B‚ʼn‚߂Ĕ­”„‚³‚ê‚ĈȗˆŒ»ÝÅ‚à•‹y‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚éŒo Œû”ð”D܂̂ЂƂ‚Ƃµ‚ÄA¢ŠE80ƒJ‘ˆÈãA400–œl‚ð‰z‚¦‚é—«‚ÉŽg—pB “ú–{‚É‚¨‚¢‚Ä’á—p—ÊŒoŒû”ð”D܂𕞗p‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚é—«‚Ì”‚ÍA1999”NˆÈ~–ˆ”N10%ˆÈã‚Ì‘ ‰Á‚ð‚Ý‚¹‚Ä‚¨‚èAŒ»Ý‚Å‚Í50–œl‚ðã‰ñ‚邯‚Ý‚ç‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚Ü‚·B œ»•i œˆã—Ê֌WŽÒŒü‚¯‚Ìî•ñ š»•iˆê—— š”å”AŠí‰È—Ìˆæ šŽY‰È•wl‰È—Ìˆæ ƒtƒ@ƒeƒBƒŠƒeƒB[.jp - https://www.fertility.jp/ Ž©•ª‚Å‘I‚Ô‚n‚b(ƒsƒ‹) - http://www.oc-rizum.jp/ š¸_‰ÈE_Œo‰ÈES—Óà‰È—Ìˆæ šzŠÂŠí‰ÈE“à‰È—Ìˆæ š–ƒŒ‰È—Ìˆæ š‚»‚Ì‘¼‚ÌŽ¡—Ã—Ìˆæ œƒAƒNƒ]ƒm[ƒxƒ‹Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐ ---







¡Alcon Laboratories,Inc.

 - http://www.alconlabs.com/; (2007)”„ã$5.6 BillionA]‹Æˆõ”14,500 

1945 Ý—§
1977 Nesle SA‚É”ƒŽûAŽP‰º‚É“ü‚éB
     * ‚µ‚©‚µAlcon‚ÅŒˆŽZƒf[ƒ^‚ð”­•\‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚邵AƒlƒXƒŒŽÐ‚Å‚ÌAlconî•ñ‚Í–w‚ǂȂ¢B
2000 Summit Autonomous Inc.‚𔃎ûB

œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ milllion)200920082007200620052004200320022001
”„ã‚6,4996,2945,5994,8974,3683,9143,407
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v2,2612,2131,8831,5721,1881,132879
Œoí—˜‰v2,3132,0831,9291,6171,2031,126858
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v2,0072,0471,5861,348931872595
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï665619564512422390350
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]15,70014,500
($ milllion)2009200820072006200520042003200220012000

š•Ä‘
Šá‰Èˆã–ò•i1,353[46.4%]1,321[47.1%]1,279.5(+9.3)[47.9%]1,170.6(+11.7)[47.5%]1,047.7[47.7%]941.3(+15.7)813.3(+15.1)706.9582.9513.9
Šá‰ÈŽèp»•i1,167[40.1%]1,084[38.6%]1,011.8(+6.5)[37.9%]950.4(+9.2)[38.6%]870.1[39.6%]778.0(+9.0)713.8(+5.2)678.3639.7589.2
Á”ïŽÒƒAƒCƒPƒA*394[13.5%]402[14.3%]381.2(+11.2)[14.2%]342.7(+23.5)[13.9%]277.6[12.7%]271.0(+4.7)258.8(+4.6)247.4242.0230.3
@Œv2,914[100%]2,807[100%]2,672.5(+8.5)[100%]2,463.7(+12.2)[100%]2,195.4[100%]1990.3(+11.4)1785.9(+9.4)1632.61464.61333.4

š‘ŠO
Šá‰Èˆã–ò•i1,324[36.9%]1,240[35.6%]1,034.3(+23.6)[35.3%]836.6(+16.2)[34.4%]720.0[33.1%]601.3(+21.1)496.6(+20.7)383.5344.9322.3
Šá‰ÈŽèp»•i1,830[51.1%]1,797[51.5%]1,488.0(+18.7)[50.9%]1,253.4(+9.3)[51.5%]1,146.8[52.8%]1036.4(+18.8)872.1(+4.0)760.2718.0674.7
Á”ïŽÒƒAƒCƒPƒA*431[12.0%]450[12.9%]404.8(+18.1)[13.8%]342.9(+11.9)[14.1%]306.3[14.1%]285.6(+13.2)252.3(+3.1)232.8220.2223.2
@Œv3,585[100%]3,487[100%]2,927.1(+20.3)[100%]2,432.9(+12.0)[100%]2,173.1[100%]1923.3(+18.6)1621.0(+8.5)1376.51283.11220.2

š‡Œv
Šá‰Èˆã–ò•i2,677(+4.5)2,561(+10.7)2,313.8(+15.3)2,007.2(+13.5)1,767.71542.6(+17.8)1309.9(+20.1)1090.4--
Šá‰ÈŽèp»•i2,997(+4.0)2,881(+15.3)2,499.8(+13.4)2,203.8(+9.3)2,016.91818.4(+14.4)1585.9(+10.2)1438.5--
Á”ïŽÒƒAƒCƒPƒA*825(-3.2)852(+8.4)786.0(+14.6)685.6(+17.4)583.9556.6(+8.9)511.1(+6.4)480.2--
@‡Œv6,499(+3.3)6,294(+12.4)5,599.6(+14.4)4,896.6(+12.1)4,368.53913.6(+14.9)3406.9(+9.0)3009.12747.72553.6
*Á”ïŽÒƒAƒCƒPƒA@‚Í2004”N“x–˜‚ÍuƒRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒYv œŽ–‹Æ•Ê”„ã
($ milllion)200920082007200620052004200320022001”õl
Š´õÇER‰ŠÇ–ò829(-5.1)874814.5(+11.5)730.2(+14.5)641.0572.7(+10.6)517.9(+16.1)446.0365.2
@@(‚¤‚¿Tobradex)-(?)(195.1)(176.0)[tobtamycin+dexamethasone]
@@(‚¤‚¿Ciloxan)-(?)(105.8)(88.3)[ciprofloxacin]
—Γàá–ò1,121(+17.4)955830.1(+19.6)693.8(+11.7)621.4526.3(+21.7)432.4(+23.7)349.6276.1
@@(‚¤‚¿Travatan)-(135.3)(70.9)(15.8)[travoprost]
ƒAƒŒƒ‹ƒM[–ò486(+5.0)463446.8(+15.6)386.6(+8.1)357.5321.4(+16.2)276.6(+24.0)223.1181.1[/Patanol(R)“™]
@@(‚¤‚¿Patanol)-(+17.9)(252.0)+27%(198.3)(154.5)[olopatadine HCl]
ލ•@‰È—p–ò355(+12.3)316257.0(+8.4)237.0(+10.1)211.9171.3(+39.4)122.9(+37.0)89.768.2[/Cipro HC Otic]
‘¼‚̈ã–ò•i“™(114)(47)(34.6)(*)(40.4)(*)(64.1)(49.1)(*)(39.9)(+121.7)(18.0)-

ˆã–ò•i@Œv2,677(+4.5)2,5612,313.8(+15.3)2,007.2(+13.5)1,767.71542.6(+17.8)1309.9(+20.1)1090.4927.8

IOL[Šá“àƒŒƒ“ƒY]1,133(+5.6)1,073919.4(+15.7)794.4(+15.2)689.4583.9(+17.1)498.6(+13.9)437.7405.4
”’“àáEÉŽq‘ÌŽèp—p1,759(+4.0)1,6921,528.8(+12.6)1,357.7(+6.8)1,271.31167.7(+14.8)1017.0(+9.7)927.0875.7
‹üÜŠO‰È—p105(-9.5)11651.6(-0.2)51.7(-8.0)56.262.8(-10.7)70.3(-4.7)73.876.6

Šá‰ÈŽèp»•i2,997(+4.0)2,8812,499.8(+13.4)2,203.8(+9.3)1,016.91814.4(+14.4)1585.9(+10.2)1438.51357.7

ƒRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒYÁ“ÅÜ448(-4.5)469440.2(+18.8)370.6(+26.7)292.6298.9(+5.9)282.2(+2.6)275.1250.9[/Opti-Free(R)‰t]
lH—܉t283(+4.0)272233.2(+16.4)200.4(+17.3)170.8141.5(+20.6)117.3(+18.2)99.296.5
‚»‚Ì‘¼94(-15.3)111112.6(-1.7)114.6(-4.9)120.5116.2(+4.1)111.6(+5.4)105.9114.8

Á”ïŽÒŒü‚¯Eye Care825(-3.2)852786.0(+14.6)685.6(+17.4)583.9556.6(+8.9)511.1(+6.4)480.2462.2

TOTAL SALES($)6,499(+3.3)6,2945,599.6(+14.4)4,896.6(+12.1)4,368.53913.6(+14.9)3406.9(+13.2)3009.12747.7
œTRAVATAN(R)@—Γàá
y2007z
Our line of glaucoma products provided the largest percentage of sales growth. Combined sales of our family of TRAVATAN(R) products, including TRAVATAN(R) ophthalmic solution, TRAVATAN Z(R) ophthalmic solution and DuoTrav.
ophthalmic solution, grew 30.9% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2006. TRAVATAN Z(R) enables doctors to help glaucoma patients with a benzalkonium chloride ("BAC") free prostaglandin. The U.S. commercial launch of TRAVATAN Z(R) began in October 2006 and we launched this product as TRAVATANZ. ophthalmic solution in Japan during the fourth quarter of 2007. In the second quarter of 2006, we launched DuoTrav(TM), a combination of the prostaglandin analogue travoprost with the beta blocker timolol, in several European Union countries, Canada and Australia. During the year ended December 31, 2007, Azopt(R) ophthalmic suspension, the Company's topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, posted a 20.4% sales increase compared to 2006, driven by growth in both the U.S. and International markets.


In 2001, we launched TRAVATAN(R), our entry into the prostaglandin analogue class of glaucoma treatments, in the United States. Prostaglandin analogues are the largest class of compounds currently available to reduce intraocular pressure, which is a primary characteristic of glaucoma. We have continued to improve and enhance the TRAVATAN(R) brand with the launch outside the United States of DuoTrav. ophthalmic solution, which combines the prostaglandin in TRAVATAN(R) with a beta blocker, timolol, and with the launch in both the United States and international markets of TRAVATAN Z(R) ophthalmic solution, a new formulation of TRAVATAN(R) that replaces the preservative benzalkonium chloride ("BAC") with the SOFZIA(R) preservative system. Brands containing our proprietary prostaglandin have been launched in more than 100 countries, including an approval in Japan obtained before the end of 2007.
œVigamox(R) ophthalmic solution(moxifloxacin)@Š´õ
y2007z
Sales of Vigamox(R) ophthalmic solution, our leading anti-infective fluoroquinolone drug, increased 16.1% compared to 2006, due to increased sales around the world as physicians continued to convert to Vigamox(R) from older anti-infective drugs.
Sales of TobraDex(R) ophthalmic suspension and ointment, our leading combination therapy for infection and inflammation, increased 8.1% during the year ended December 31, 2007 over the prior year.


Our leading ocular anti-infective product is Vigamox(R) ophthalmic solution, utilizing moxifloxacin to treat bacterial conjunctivitis. According to the Wolters Kluwer Health Source Prescription Audit, Vigamox(R) was the leading ophthalmic topical antibiotic in the United States in 2007. During 2006, we received approval and launched Vigamox(R) in Japan under the trade name Vegamox(R) ophthalmic solution.
y2007“Á‹–z
Vigamox‚ÍAlcon‚ªBayer Healthcare AG‚©‚烉ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚ðŽó‚¯‚Ä‚¢‚ÄA“Á‹–‚Ì‚Q‚Â
‚ÍBayer Healthcare‚ª•ÛŽA‚R‚–ڂÍAlcon‚ª•ÛŽ‚·‚é‚à‚Ì‚Å2020”N–˜B
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc‚ªApril 5, 2006ʼn‚ÌANDA\¿
œNEVANAC(R) ophthalmic suspension@R‰ŠÇ
y2007z
NEVANAC(R) ophthalmic suspension is our ophthalmic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ("NSAID") for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Sales of NEVANAC(R) grew 30.0% in the year ended December 31, 2007 over the prior year.


During 2005, we launched a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ("NSAID") in the U.S. market for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery. NEVANAC(R) ophthalmic suspension is unique because it is a prodrug where the active ingredient is released upon instillation in the eye. During 2007, NEVANAC(R) maintained the number two NSAID market share in the United States, according to Wolters Kluwer Health Source Prescription Audit. We also executed several launches of NEVANAC(R) outside the United States during 2007.
œPatanol(R)“_Šá‰t@ƒAƒŒƒ‹ƒM[
y2007z
Despite relatively flat growth in the U.S. allergy market, global sales of our allergy products, Patanol(R) ophthalmic solution and Pataday. ophthalmic solution, grew 16.5% in the year ended December 31, 2007 over 2006. An important contributor to this above-market growth was the U.S. launch of Pataday(TM), the only once-a-day ocular prescription allergy medicine, that led to total allergy franchise market share gains as reported by Wolters Kluwer Health Source Prescription Audit. Patanol(R) product sales also were supported by faster growth outside the United States, due in part to the market share gained by this product in the spring allergy season in 2007 in Japan, where it was launched in September 2006.


Patanol(R) ophthalmic solution was the first ocular allergy product with a dual-action active ingredient, which acts as both an antihistamine and a mast-cell stabilizer. According to Wolters Kluwer Health Source Prescription Audit, Patanol(R) was the leading ophthalmic topical anti-allergy prescription product in the United States in 2007. During 2006, we received approval and launched Patanol(R) in Japan, the second largest ophthalmic allergy market. We have a co-marketing agreement in Japan with Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. (Kyowa Hakko), a leading Japanese pharmaceutical company, whereby Kyowa Hakko promotes Patanol(R) to non-eye care physicians and we promote the product to eye care physicians. In February 2007, we launched in the United States the first and only once-a-day ocular prescription allergy medicine, Pataday. ophthalmic solution, which is a new formulation of olopatadine, the active ingredient in Patanol(R). We currently sell Patanol(R) in more than 90 countries.
y2007“Á‹–z
Patanol‚Ì“Á‹–‚Í‹¦˜a”­y‚ª•ÛŽ‚µ2010”N–˜B@‚à‚¤ˆê‚‚͋¦˜a‚ÆAlcon‚ª‹¤“¯‚Å2015”N–˜B
ƒJƒiƒ_Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp‚ªANDA\¿‚µA‹¦˜a‚ÆAlcon—¼ŽÐ‚Í2006.11.15’ñ‘iB
‚»‚Ì‚½‚ßA’ñ‘i‚ª‰ðŒˆ‚ ‚é‚¢‚Í’nÙ‚ªFDA³”F‚Ì30ƒ•ŒŽ•Û—¯‚ð•ÏX‚µ‚È‚¢ŒÀ‚èAFDA‚ÍApotex‚ÌANDA\¿‚ð
30ƒ•ŒŽ’x‚点‚˂΂Ȃç‚È‚¢B
@ŽŸ‚ÉBarr Laboratories, Inc‚ªPatanol‚ÌANDA\¿‚ðs‚¢A2007.10.1 AlconŽÐ‚É‚»‚ÌŽ|’Ê’m‚³‚ꂽB
Apotex ANDA‚ƈقȂèABarr ANDA‚Í‹¦˜a”­y’P“Æ“Á‹–‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚é‚à‚ÌB
FDA‚ªBarr ANDA‚ð³”F‰Â”\‚È30ƒ•ŒŽŒã‚ÍA‹¦˜a”­y“Á‹–ޏŒø‚Ì‚Xƒ•ŒŽ‘O‚Ì‚Ì2010.3‚Ɋ܂ނ±‚ƂɂȂéB
œCIPRODEX(R) otic suspension@ލ‰ÈŠ´õ
y2007z
U.S. sales of CIPRODEX(R) otic suspension were primarily responsible for an 8.4% increase in global sales of otic products during the most recent year. (CIPRODEX(R) is a registered trademark of Bayer AG, licensed to Alcon by Bayer Healthcare AG.) The vast majority of CIPRODEX(R) otic sales occur in the United States. According to Wolters Kluwer Health Source Prescription Audit, total U.S. prescriptions for CIPRODEX(R) otic increased 5.4% in the year ended December 31, 2007, while total U.S. prescriptions in the otic segment of the market declined 3.4%.


We also market combination anti-infective/anti-inflammatory products for ear infections. CIPRODEX(R) otic suspension for the treatment of otitis media in the presence of tympanostomy tubes ("AOMT") and of otitis externa, commonly known as swimmer's ear, is marketed in the United States and a small number of countries outside the United States. In addition, Cipro(R) HC Otic, for the treatment of otitis externa, is currently marketed in over 30 countries. Sales of our otic products are seasonal, with a higher percentage of prescriptions written during the summer months.
œ
y2007z
œAlcon Laboratories,Inc.

- http://www.alconlabs.com/ œProducts œHealthcare hProfessional œPatients & Family ¡Investors & Media œFinancials šAnnual Reports & Quaterly Reports - 2009 Annual Report - 2008 Annual Report - 2007 Annual Report - 2006 Annual Report - 2005 Annual Report - 2004 Annual Report šSEC Filings - 2009 Form 20-F[16-Mar-2020] - [pdf,220p] - 2008 Form 20-F[17-Mar-2009] - [pdf] - Form 20-F[18-Mar-2008] - [pdf] - Form 20-F[19-Mar-2007] - [pdf] - Form 20-F[15-Mar-2006] - [pdf] - Form 20-F[15-Mar-2005] - [pdf] - œPress Release - Alcon's Fourth Quarter Sales Rise 14.5 Percent[2010.2.11] - Alcon Fourth Quarter Diluted EPS Increased 12.8 Percent[2009.2.11] - Alcon's Fourth Quarter Sales Rise 20.0 Percent[2008.2.6] - Alcon's Fourth Quarter Sales Rise 16.1 Percent[2007.2.7]
œ“ú–{ƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“

-http://www.alconlabs.com/jp/ 1973”N‚É“ú–{Šé‹Æ‚Ƃ̇•Ù‰ïŽÐ(u’élƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐv)‚Æ‚µ‚ÄŽ–‹Æ‚ðŠJŽnB 1978”N‚ɃAƒ‹ƒRƒ“‚Ì100“oŽ‘‚ƂȂèAŽÐ–¼‚ðu“ú–{ƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐv‚Æ•ÏXB ƒT[ƒWƒJƒ‹Ž–‹Æ/ˆã–ò•iŽ–‹Æ/ƒrƒWƒ‡ƒ“ƒPƒAŽ–‹Æ 1992 @ŠáŸó—¬Eôò‰tuƒr[ƒGƒXƒGƒXƒvƒ‰ƒXRv”­”„B 1993 @’´‰¹”g”’“àáŽèp‘•’uu20000ƒŒƒKƒV[TMv”­”„B @ƒtƒH[ƒ‹ƒ_ƒuƒ‹Šá“àƒŒƒ“ƒYuƒAƒNƒŠƒ\ƒtRv”­”„B 1994 @—ΓàáE‚Šáˆ³ÇŽ¡—ÃÜuƒxƒgƒvƒeƒBƒbƒNR0.5““_Šá‰tv”­”„B 1995 @Šá‰ÈŽèp•â•ÜuƒvƒƒrƒXƒNRv”­”„B 1996 @ƒ\ƒtƒgƒRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒY—pƒR[ƒ‹ƒhÁ“ʼntuƒIƒvƒeƒBEƒtƒŠ[Rv”­”„B @’´‰¹”g”’“àáŽèp‘•’uuƒ†ƒjƒo[ƒTƒ‹R‚h‚hv”­”„B 1997 @ƒ\ƒtƒgƒRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒY—pƒR[ƒ‹ƒhÁ“ʼntuƒIƒvƒeƒBEƒtƒŠ[ @iƒ}ƒ‹ƒ`ƒp[ƒpƒXƒ\ƒŠƒ…[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“jv”­”„B @ÉŽq‘ÌŽèp‘•’uuƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“ƒAƒLƒ…ƒ‰ƒXRv”­”„B @Šá‰È—p’´‰¹”gf’f‘•’uuƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“ƒEƒ‹ƒgƒ‰ƒXƒLƒƒƒ“v”­”„B 2002 @‘n—§30Žü”N‚ðŒ}‚¦‚éB ƒ\ƒtƒgƒRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒY—pƒR[ƒ‹ƒhÁ“ʼntuƒIƒvƒeƒBEƒtƒŠ[ ƒvƒ‰ƒXR @iƒ}ƒ‹ƒ`ƒp[ƒpƒXƒ\ƒŠƒ…[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“jv”­”„B Šáˆ³~‰ºÜuƒGƒCƒ]ƒvƒg(R) ‚P““_Šá‰tv”­”„B 2003 ƒtƒH[ƒ‹ƒ_ƒuƒ‹Šá“àƒŒƒ“ƒY uƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“ ƒAƒNƒŠƒ\ƒt ƒVƒ“ƒOƒ‹ƒs[ƒX SA30AT/SA60ATv”­”„B ’´‰¹”g”’“àáŽèp‘•’uuƒCƒ“ƒtƒBƒjƒeƒBRƒrƒWƒ‡ƒ“ƒVƒXƒeƒ€v”­”„ œƒAƒCƒPƒAî•ñ œˆã—Ê֌WŽÒ‚̃y[ƒW[—vID] @`ƒAƒ‹ƒRƒ“»•iAŠw‰ïƒZƒ~ƒi[“™




¡Alfa Wassermann S.P.A.[ˆÉ]

 - http://www.alfawassermann.it/index.php
Ý—§@1948”NB@Ž„Šé‹ÆB@”N•ñ‚ȂǂÌÚ׃f[ƒ^‚Í”ñŒöŠJB
@]‹Æˆõ”1000l’´‚¤‚¿ƒCƒ^ƒŠƒA‘“à663l(2005.5.9 News)
Žq‰ïŽÐ|ƒ|[ƒ‰ƒ“ƒh(2004.1‘n‹Æ)A’†‘Aƒ`ƒ…ƒjƒWƒAAƒnƒ“ƒKƒŠ[‚ÌŽlƒJ‘
2003.2  Bama-Geve(ƒXƒyƒCƒ“»–ò‰ïŽÐ)”ƒŽûŠ®—¹
2004.2  Farmigea SpA[ƒCƒ^ƒŠƒAŠá‰ÈE•wl‰È—̈æ‚Ì»–ò‰ïŽÐ]‚Ì35%‚ðŽæ“¾B
2004    PomeziaHꔄ‹pŒðŠJŽn(2005”N‘O”¼Š®—¹)
2004    Helena Laboratories‚̃Cƒ^ƒŠƒAŽ–‹Æ•”–å‚𔃎ûB(2005”N5.9Š®—¹)
        (Electrophoresis & Coagulation system‚Ì‘ÛŠé‹Æ)
2005.2  Biosaude(ƒ|ƒ‹ƒgƒKƒ‹‚Ì»–ò‰ïŽÐ)‚𔃎ûŠ®—¹

2005”N“x”„ã‚—\‘z210 Million Euro(+12%)B

œŒˆŽZ[12ŒŽŒˆŽZ]
(çEuro)@@@  2004    2003    2002
”„ã‚          186,458 172,919 180,584
EBIT             16,321  10,363  18,113
EBITDA           33,813  28,628  29,501
ƒ—˜‰v            4,884   7,499   4,766

œƒZƒOƒƒ“ƒg•Ê”„ã‚
(çEuro)@@@  2004    2003    2002
Pharmaceuticals 125,733 111,694 103,626
Diagnostics      39,881  40,702  42,944
Others           20,844  20,523  19,197
 •ª—£Ï‚ÝŽ–‹Æ         -       -  14,817
 ‡@Œv         186,458 172,919 180,584
 from Alfa Wassermann: the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004[2005.7.11]

œŽå—Í»•i
Rifaximin (ˆÉ‘“à–¼Normix) - Ž©ŽÐŠJ”­•i‚ŃXƒyƒCƒ“E•Ä‘“™12‚©‘‚ų”FB
Alfaferone(“V‘Rinterferon-ƒ¿)
Fluxum (parnaparin -’ᕪŽqƒwƒpƒŠƒ“)
¢ŠE‚U‚TƒJ‘‚Å‚P‚Q»•i‚ð”Ì”„B

One of the strong points of Alfa Wassermann SpA is that more than 60% of turnover is generated by its own products, developed by in-house research.
These include market leaders such as Normix®, an innovative antibiotic with a topical intestinal activity, discovered and patented by Alfa Wassermann. Other important specialities are Alfaferone® (Alfa natural interferon) and Fluxum® (Parnaparin - patented low molecular weight heparin). Alfa Wassermann also has a Division marketing and selling non prescription specialities with an extensive network of direct promoters to pharmacies.

[The International Division] In 1989, Alfa Wassermann set its own International Division with two main aims - to increase exports of its speciality drugs by exploring new territories and to promote the international development of its original products with a network of strategic alliances.  Today Alfa Wassermann operates with a portfolio of 11 products in more than 60 countries throughout the world and an efficient network of distributors, efficiently backed by an in-house organisation able to provide all the assistance required.
Normix® (Rifaximin) is one of the main products abroad and has significant growth prospects.
The product internationalization plan is starting to give results.
Rifaximin is today registered in 12 countries and in October 2004 the product, under the name Spiraxin®, was introduced into the market in Spain by Bama-Geve S.L. and another Alfa Wassermann licensee company.
But the most important goal was without doubt the launch of the drug on the USA market under the name XifaxanE




œAlfa Wassermann S.P.A.[ˆÉ]

œPress Releases Alfa Wassermann: the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005[2006.5.15] Alfa Wassermann: the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004[2005.7.11] JAPANESE LICENSEE FOR LICOFELONE[2004.5.28] - –{Ü‚ÍMerckle GmbH‚É‚æ‚è‘n»‚³‚êAthe Euroalliance consortium“à•”‚Å Alfa Wassermann SpA, Merckle GmbH and Lacer SA ‚Ì‹¤“¯ŠJ”­‚·‚éŠvV“IÁ‰Š’Á’ÉÜB @Z—F»–ò‚ɕό`«ŠÖßǂ̓K‰žÇ‚Å“ú–{‚ł̓ÆèŒ ‚ð•t—^‚·‚éŒ_–ñ‚ð’÷Œ‹B FDA Approves rifaximin[2004.5.26] - ¤•i–¼Xifaxan‚Æ‚µ‚ă‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXæSalixŽÐ‚©‚ç”Ì”„—\’èB(“K‰žÇ|‘å’°‹ÛŠ´õ‚É‚æ‚鉺—Ÿ) Alfa Wassermann: the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 [2004.7.15]




Alkermes, Inc.[US]
¡Alkermes, Inc.

 - http://www.alkermes.com/@;(Nasdaq) ALKS; 88 Sidney Street,Cambridge, MA 02139
1987.6  MIT‚Ì‚Sl‚ÌŒ¤‹†ŽÒ‚ªÝ—§B


œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ@[‚RŒŽŒˆŽZ]
($000)2009/32008/32007/32006/32005/32004/32003/32002/32001/3”õl
Žû“ü
Vivitrol”„ã4,467--------[naltrexoneŽ‘±’]ƒAƒ‹ƒR[ƒ‹ˆË‘¶Ç‚PŒŽ‚P‰ñ:Cephalon‚Æ‹¤“¯
@»‘¢Žû“ü116,844101,700105,41664,90140,48825,73614,317-
@RoyaltyŽû“ü33,24729,45723,15116,5329,6363,7901,165-
@Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­Œ_–ñŽû“ü42,08789,51074,48345,88326,0029,52831,78454,102
@Net collaborative profit130,19420,05036,91539,285----
‘Žû“ü@Œv326,839240,717239,965166,60176,12639,05447,26654,102

Œo”ï
»‘¢Œ´‰¿43,39640,67745,20923,48916,83419,03710,910-
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï89,478125,268117,31589,06891,06591,09785,38892,092
”Ì”„Eˆê”ÊŠÇ—”ï59,00859,50866,39940,38328,82326,02926,69424,387
ƒŠƒXƒgƒ‰”ï—p-6,423--11,527-2086,497-
Œ´‰¿EŒo”ï@‡Œv191,882243,506228,923152,940148,249135,955129,489116,479

‰c‹Æ—˜‰v134,957(2,789)11,04213,661(72,123)(96,901)(82,223)(62,377)
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v130,505166,9799,4453,818(73,916)(102,385)(106,898)(61,355)

]‹Æˆõ”570760
œ‘ŠŽèæ•”Žû“ü“à–ó@[‚RŒŽŒˆŽZ]
($000)2009/32008/32007/32006/32005/32004/3Ží—Þ“à–ó
Janssen[46%][52%][47%]82,798[49%]50,446[66%]28,488[73%]»‘¢&RoyaltyRISPERDAL CONSTA;Ž‘±«»Ü‚Å75ƒ•‘³”FA”­”„‚͕đŠÜ‚Þ55ƒ•‘
Cephalon[41%][11%][24%]39,285[24%]--2005.6 Ž‘±«naltrexone»ÜVivitrol‚Ì‹¤“¯ŠJ”­E»‘¢E”Ì”„Œ_–ñB–{Ü‚Í2006.4 FDA³”F
Lilly[8%][23%][20%]34,946[21%]16,833[22%]333[1%]1)2001.4 ‹z“üƒCƒ“ƒXƒŠƒ“AIR insulin‚Ì‹¤“¯ŠJ”­Œ_–ñB
2)2005.12 parathyroid hormone("PTH")‹z“üÜAIR parathyroid hormone‚Ì‹¤“¯ŠJ”­Œ_–ñB
Amylin[3%][14%][1%]7,882[5%]5,156[7%]3,797[10%]2000.5 exenatide‚ÌŽ‘±«»Ü("exenatide LAR")‚Ì‹¤“¯ŠJ”­Œ_–ñB
Genentech19[-%]526[1%]4,495[12%]
‚»‚Ì‘¼1,671[1%]3,165[4%]1,941[4%]
@‡Œv166,601[100%]76,126[100%]39,054[100%]
œAlkermes, Inc.

œProducts VIVITROL œNewsroom - Press Releases FDA Grants Approval for Use of RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) as Both a Monotherapy
and Adjunctive Therapy in the Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder
[2009.5.18] Exenatide Once Weekly New Drug Application Submitted to FDA for Type 2 Diabetes[2009.5.5] RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) Approved in Japan[2009.4.27] Alkermes Regains Full Commercialization Rights to VIVITROL(R) in US[2008.12.1] - Cephalon‚Ƃ̔̔„Œ_–ñ‚ð2008.12.1‰ðÁB FDA Approves New Injection Site for RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) for Schizophrenia Treatment[2008.10.9] - ˜r‚̋ؒ‚ð³”F Supplemental New Drug Application for RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) Submitted to the FDA for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder[2008.7.24] Supplemental New Drug Application for RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) Submitted to
the FDA for the Treatment of Frequently Relapsing Bipolar Disorder
[2008.4.14] FDA Approves New Dose of RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) for Schizophrenia Treatment[2007.4.13] - 12.5 mg—p—ʂ̔F‰ÂB RISPERDAL CONSTA‚Í2003”N³”FÏ‚Ý(25 mg, 37.5 mg and 50 mg)B Alkermes Submits Marketing Authorization Application for Vivitrol(R) in the United Kingdom and Germany[2007.4.2] Alkermes Announces Submission of New Drug Application for RISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) in Japan[2006.12.20] - ƒ„ƒ“ƒZƒ“ŽÐ“ú–{‚ÅRISPERDAL(R) CONSTA(R) ((risperidone) long-acting injection ‚ð\¿B–{Ü‚ÍAlkermesŽÐ‚ÌMedisorb(R)‹ZpŽg—pB VIVITROL(TM), the First, Once-Monthly Injectable Medication for Alcohol Dependence Now Available in the United States[2006.6.13] - ʼn‚Å—Bˆê‚Ì‚Pƒ•ŒŽ‚P‰ñ“Š—^‚̃Aƒ‹ƒR[ƒ‹ˆË‘¶ÇŽ¡—ÖòB •Ä‘‚Å‚Í1800–œl‚ªƒAƒ‹ƒR[ƒ‹ˆË‘¶Ç‚Å‚¤‚¿220–œl‚ª—vŽ¡—ÃB75%‚ªÄ”­B Alkermes and Cephalon Receive FDA Approval of Vivitrol(TM) for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence[2006.4.13] - Alkermes‚ÍCephalon‚ɕđ‚ł̔̔„Œ ‚ðƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚µ³”FŽž$110 MILLION‚̃}ƒCƒ‹ƒXƒg[ƒ“‚ðŽó‚¯Žæ‚éŒ_–ñ‚ð 2005.6‚É’÷Œ‹B œInvestor Relations šSEC Filings 10-K Annual[2009.5.28] - [pdf] 10-K Annual[2008.5.30] - [pdf] 10-K Annual[2007.6.14] - [pdf] 10-K Annual[2006.6.14] - [pdf]




¡Allergan

http://www.allergan.com/

œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($Million)20102009200820072006200520042003200220012000”õl

»•i”„ã‚4,819.6(+8.4)4,447.64,339.73,879.03,010.12,319.22,045.61,755.41,385.01,142.1992.1
@‚¤‚¿ˆã–ò3,973.4(+7.9)3,683.83,502.33,105.02,272.81,945.61,672.71,357.21,142.1992.1
@‚¤‚¿ˆã—×p‹ï846.2(+10.8)763.8837.4774.046.4100.082.727.8--Žå‚ÉŒ_–ñŽû“ü
‚»‚Ì‘¼Žû“ü99.856.063.759.953.223.413.39.4
Œ¤‹†ƒT[ƒrƒXŽû“ü-------16.0
‘Žû“ü@Œv4,919.44,503.64,403.43,938.93,063.32,342.62,058.91,780.8

‰c‹Æ—˜‰v258.6928.0796.1719.4(3.2)570.9527.4
‹Œ1,658.9
(23.7)
‹Œ1,435.1
1,163.3944.0794.4
Œoí—˜‰v170.8848.5787..2687.7(19.5)599.2
‹Œ570.9
532.1
‹Œ527.4
(52.5)
‹Œ-23.7
129.0242.1
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï804.6706.0797.9718.11,055.5388.3342.9762.6233.1227.5165.7
ƒ—˜‰v4.9623.8578..6499.3(127.4)403.9377.1-52.575.2224.9215.1

‘Û”„ã”ä—¦37.4%34.6%34.8%34.3%32.6%32.5%30.9%29.6%29.4%
]‹Æˆõ”9,2008,7407,8865,0555,030
œŽ–‹Æ•Ê
($Million)2010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998”õl

¡ˆã–ò•i@/Specialty Pharmaceuticals Segment Product
œŠá‰È—p–ò2,262.0(+7.7%)2,100.62,009.11,776.51,530.61,321.71137.1(+13.8)999.5(+20.8)827.3753.7683.9576.2510.1
Alphagan401.6(-3.1)414.5398.1(+)341.4(+15.4)295.9277.2(+3.1)268.9(-6.2)286.8(+15.4)248.5(+1)250.9(+8.3)231.6(+36.9)??Brimonidine Tartrate —Γàá
Lumigan526.7(+15.4)456.5426.2391.7(+19.6)327.5267.6(+14.9)232.9(+28.5)181.3(+47.4)123.035.4---Bimatoprost Šá‰È—p—Γàá
‘¼‚̗Γàá–ò14.815.3(-6.5)16.318.0(-5.9)19.1(-15.9)22.7(-7.7)24.6
Latisse81.8(+11.0)73.7----------[Bimatoprost]‚܂‚°”ü—e‰ti‚܂–шç–ÑÜjFDA³”F2008.12.26A•Ä‘”­”„2009.1
Restasis620.5(+18.7)522.9444.0344.5(+27.5)270.2190.9(+91.2)99.8(+160.6)38.3(-)-----cyclosporine/ƒhƒ‰ƒCƒAƒC
œ”畆‰È—p–ò229.5(+10.3)208.0113.7110.7125.7120.2103.4(-5.4)109.3(+21.2)90.278.968.776.660.6
Tazorac/Avage--77.2(-3.4)79.9(-12.4)91.286.9(+15.7)75.1(-6.5)80.3(+29.3)62.145.4(+39.5)32.7(+57.2)--tazarotene
œBotox1,419.4(+8.4)1,309.61,310.91,211.8982.2830.9705.1(+25.0)563.9(+28.2)439.7309.5(+29.2%)239.5(+39)175.8125.3botulinum toxin A
œ”å”AŠí—p–ò62.5(-4.7)65.668.66.0-
Sanctura62.5(-4.7)65.668.24.9-[trospium]
œ‚»‚Ì‘¼-----46.4100.0(+20.9)82.7(+197.5)27.0Žå‚ɃRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒY
ˆã–ò•i‡Œv3,973.4(+7.9)3,683.83,502..33,105.02,638.52,319.22045.6(+16.5)1755.4(+26.7)1385.01142.1992.1828.6716

¡ˆã—Ë@Ší@/Medical Devices Segment Product
‹¹•”ƒGƒXƒe319.1(+11.0)287.5310.0298.4177.2-
”얞Ǘp•i243.3(-5.8)258.2296.0270.1142.3-
ŠçƒGƒXƒe283.8(+30.1)218.1231.4202.852.1-
‚»‚Ì‘¼---2.7--
ˆã—Ë@Ší@Œv846.2(+10.8)763.8837.4774.0371.6-
*’) Botox (2002) Cosmetic 40%‚ðè‚ß‚é @from Allergan Reports Fourth Quarter Operating Results[2004.1.28] @Allergan Reports Year End Operating Results[2003.1.29]
ƒ{ƒcƒŠƒkƒX“Å‘f@
[2010]

In 2008, the FDA announced in an gEarly Communicationh its review of certain adverse events following the use of botulinum toxins, including Botox® and Botox® Cosmetic. In 2009, simultaneously with its approval of Dysport™ , the FDA announced the completion of its review and has requested that we adopt a REMS program equivalent to the REMS program required for Dysport™ . In 2009, the FDA approved our REMS program for Botox® , which addresses the risks related to botulinum toxin spread beyond the injection site and the lack of botulinum toxin interchangeability. In the second quarter of 2010, the FDA requested that we submit an update to the Botox® Medication Guide to include the chronic migraine indication, updated REMS to include a physician training plan for chronic migraine, and a proposed physician communication, including a draft gdear healthcare practitionerh letter announcing the chronic migraine indication and providing information on the updated REMS. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the FDA approved Botox® for the prophylactic treatment of headaches in adults with chronic migraine. We cannot assure you that any other compounds or products that we are developing for commercialization will be approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory bodies for marketing or that we will be able to commercialize them on terms that will be profitable, or at all. If any of our products cannot be successfully or timely commercialized or our direct-to-consumer advertising materials fail to be approved by the FDA, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Total sales of Botox increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to an increase in sales of Botox® for both cosmetic and therapeutic use in all of our principal geographic markets. We believe sales of Botox , primarily Botox® Cosmetic, were negatively impacted in 2010 by the introduction of a competitive product that was launched in the United States in June 2009. Based on internal information and assumptions, we estimate in 2010 that Botox® therapeutic sales accounted for approximately 51% of total consolidated Botox sales and grew at a rate of approximately 6% compared to 2009. In 2010, Botox® Cosmetic sales accounted for approximately 49% of total consolidated Botox sales and increased by approximately 11% compared to 2009. We believe our worldwide market share for neuromodulators, including Botox® , was approximately 77% in the third quarter of 2010, the last quarter for which market data is available.

Our neuromodulator product, Botox® (onabotulinumtoxinA), has a long-established safety profile and has been approved by the FDA for more than 20 years to treat a variety of therapeutic conditions, as well as for aesthetic use since 2002. In 2010, therapeutic uses accounted for approximately 51% and aesthetic uses for approximately 49% of total sales. With more than 2,000 publications on Botox® and Botox® Cosmetic in scientific and medical journals, results of approximately 50 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials involving more than 11,000 patients, Botox® is a widely researched medicine with more than 100 potential therapeutic and aesthetic uses reported in the medical literature. Over 18 million treatment sessions have been recorded with Botox® and Botox® Cosmetic in the United States alone over the past 16 years (1994-2009). Marketed as Botox® , Botox® Cosmetic, Vistabel® , Vistabex® or Botox® Vista® depending on the indication and country of approval, the product is currently approved in approximately 80 countries for up to 21 unique indications. In 2009, following the approval of a competitor product, Dysport™ in the United States, we adopted a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies program, or REMS, including a boxed warning about the potential spread of botulinum toxins from the site of injection and the lack of interchangeability among botulinum toxin products. Sales of Botox® represented approximately 29%, 29% and 30% of our total consolidated product net sales in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Botox® has been primarily used therapeutically for the treatment of certain neuromuscular disorders which are characterized by involuntary muscle contractions or spasms as well as upper limb spasticity. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the FDA approved Botox® for the prophylactic treatment of headaches in adults with chronic migraine. The approved therapeutic indications for Botox® in the United States are as follows:

€kÎ blepharospasm, the uncontrollable contraction of the eyelid muscles which can force the eye closed and result in functional blindness;
€kÎ strabismus, or misalignment of the eyes, in people 12 years of age and over;
€kÎ cervical dystonia, or sustained contractions or spasms of muscles in the shoulders or neck in adults, along with associated neck pain;
€kÎ severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis (underarm sweating) that is inadequately managed with topical agents;
€kÎ the treatment of increased muscle stiffness in the elbow, wrist and fingers in adults with upper limb spasticity; and
€kÎ the prophylactic (preventative) treatment of headaches in adults with chronic migraine.

In many countries outside of the United States, Botox® is approved for treating hemifacial spasm, spasticity associated with pediatric cerebral palsy and upper limb spasticity in post-stroke patients. We are currently in development for Botox® in the United States and Europe for new indications, including lower limb spasticity, neurogenic overactive bladder, idiopathic overactive bladder and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

In the third quarter of 2010, we received approval for Botox® for the prophylactic treatment of headaches in adults with chronic migraine in the United Kingdom. In 2009, we submitted regulatory files for the use of Botox® to treat chronic migraine in France, Switzerland and Canada and are currently seeking approval in the European Union. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we filed a supplemental Biologics License Application, or sBLA, with the FDA for the use of Botox® in the treatment of urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity resulting from neurogenic bladder and we are currently seeking approval in the European Union and Canada. In 2010, we completed enrollment in our Phase III clinical trials for the use of Botox® to treat idiopathic overactive bladder. In 2005, we initiated Phase II clinical trials outside the United States for the use of Botox® to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. In 2009, we filed an Investigational New Drug Application with the FDA relating to the use of Botox® to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Botox® Cosmetic

The FDA approved Botox® Cosmetic in 2002 for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adult men and women age 65 or younger. Referred to as Botox® , Botox® Cosmetic, Vistabel , Vistabex or Botox® Vista , depending on the country of approval, this product is administered in small injections to temporarily reduce the muscle activity that causes the formation of glabellar lines between the eyebrows that often develop during the aging process. Currently, more than 60 countries have approved facial aesthetic indications for Botox® , Botox® Cosmetic, Vistabel® , Vistabex® or Botox® Vista® . In Australia, New Zealand, Canada and certain countries in East Asia and Latin America, we have regulatory approvals for upper facial lines, including crowfs feet. Since we have launched Botox® Cosmetic, we have conducted comprehensive direct-to-consumer marketing campaigns in the United States. We continue to sponsor aesthetic specialty physician training in approved countries to further expand the base of qualified physicians using Botox® , Botox® Cosmetic, Vistabel® , Vistabex® or Botox® Vista® .

In 2005, we entered into a long-term arrangement with GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, under which GSK agreed to develop and promote Botox® in Japan and China and we agreed to co-promote GSKfs products Imitrex STATdose System® (sumatriptan succinate) and Amerge® (naratriptan hydrochloride) in the United States until the third quarter of 2010. In the first quarter of 2010, we reacquired the rights from GSK to develop and sell Botox® in Japan and China for all current and future cosmetic indications. GSK retains the rights granted under the long-term arrangement to develop and sell Botox® in Japan and China for all current and future therapeutic indications. In 2009, Botox® was approved in Japan for the additional indications of glabellar lines and equinus foot due to lower limb spasticity in juvenile cerebral palsy patients and was launched in Japan for these indications with the glabellar lines indication marketed as Botox® Vista® . Botox® was also approved for the treatment of glabellar lines in China in 2009. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we received approval of Botox® in Japan for the treatment of upper and lower limb spasticity.

Competition

Botox® was the only neuromodulator approved by the FDA until 2000, when the FDA approved Myobloc® (rimabotulinumtoxinB), a neuromodulator formerly marketed by Elan Pharmaceuticals and Solstice Neurosciences Inc. and marketed by US Worldmeds since 2010. In 2009, the FDA approved Dysport™ (abobotulinumtoxinA) for the treatment of cervical dystonia and glabellar lines, which is marketed by Ipsen Ltd., or Ipsen, and Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, or Medicis, respectively. The approved package for Dysport™ included a boxed warning regarding the symptoms associated with the spread of botulinum toxin beyond the injection site. Additionally, the FDA approved Ipsenfs and Medicisf REMS program, which addresses the lack of interchangeability of botulinum toxin products and the risks associated with the spread of botulinum toxin beyond the injection site. Ipsen has marketed Dysport for therapeutic indications in Europe since 1991, prior to our European commercialization of Botox® in 1992. In 2006, Ipsen received marketing authorization for a cosmetic indication for Dysport in Germany. In 2007, Ipsen granted Galderma, a joint venture between Nestle and LfOr€Amal Group, an exclusive development and marketing license for Dysport™ for cosmetic indications in the European Union, Russia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and first rights of negotiation for other countries around the world, except the United States, Canada and Japan. In 2008, Galderma became Ipsenfs sole distributor for Dysport™ in Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay. In 2009, the health authorities of 15 European Union countries approved Dysport™ for glabellar lines under the trade name Azzalure™ . In the fourth quarter of 2010, Galderma announced its plan to acquire Q-Med A.B., a Swedish company that markets several products for various therapeutic areas derived from hyaluronic acid, including Restylane® and Perlane™ dermal fillers.

In addition, Merz Pharmaceuticalsf, or Merzfs, botulinum toxin product Xeomin® , is currently approved for therapeutic indications in Germany and several other countries in the European Union. Xeomin® was approved by the FDA in the third quarter of 2010 for cervical dystonia and blepharospasm in adults previously treated with Botox® . Merz is currently pursuing FDA approval of Xeomin® for cosmetic use in the United States. In 2009, Merz received approval of Bocouture® (rebranded from Xeomin® ) for glabellar lines in Germany. In 2010, Bocouture® was approved in significant markets within the European Union. Xeomin® is also approved for glabellar lines in Argentina and Mexico. In the first quarter of 2010, Merz acquired Bioform Medical Inc., or Bioform, a California-based company that markets Radiesse® , a calcium hydroxylapatite filler. Merz also previously acquired rights from Anteis S.A., a Swiss company, to market Belotero , a hyaluronic acid filler, in certain European markets, the United States and Canada. The FDA accepted Merzfs registration file for Belotero in 2009.

Mentor Worldwide LLC, a division of Johnson & Johnson, or Mentor, is conducting clinical trials for a competing neuromodulator in the United States which Mentor has indicated that it expects to be approved in 2012 or beyond. A Korean botulinum toxin, Meditoxin® , was approved for sale in Korea in 2006. The company, Medy-Tox Inc., received exportation approval from Korean authorities in early 2005 to ship their product under the trade name Neuronox® . Neuronox is marketed in Hong Kong, India and Thailand. Meditoxin® is approved in approximately seven South American countries, including Brazil and Columbia, under various trade names.

In addition, we are aware of competing neuromodulators currently being developed and commercialized in Asia, Europe, South America and other markets. A Chinese entity, Lanzhou Biological Institute, received approval to market a botulinum toxin in China in 1997 under the tradename HengLi, and has launched its botulinum toxin product in other lightly regulated markets in Asia, South America and Central America under several trade names. These lightly regulated markets may not require adherence to the FDAfs current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations, or cGMPs, or the regulatory requirements of the European Medical Evaluation Agency or other regulatory agencies in countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. While these products are unlikely to meet stringent U.S. regulatory standards, the companies operating in these markets may be able to produce products at a lower cost than we can.

Our sales of Botox® could be materially and negatively impacted by this competition or competition from other companies that might obtain FDA approval or approval from other regulatory authorities to market a neuromodulator.

—Γàá
[2010]

The largest segment of the market for ophthalmic prescription drugs is for the treatment of glaucoma, a sight-threatening disease typically characterized by elevated intraocular pressure leading to optic nerve damage. Glaucoma is currently the worldfs second leading cause of blindness, and we estimate that over 70 million people worldwide have glaucoma. According to IMS Health Incorporated, our products for the treatment of glaucoma, including Lumigan® (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) 0.03%, Lumigan® 0.01%, Ganfort™ (bimatoprost/timolol maleate ophthalmic solution), Alphagan® (brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution) 0.2%, or Alphagan® , Alphagan® P 0.15%, Alphagan® P 0.1% and Combigan® (brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate ophthalmic solution) 0.2%/0.5%, captured approximately 26.2% of worldwide market sales in their product categories for first nine months of 2010.

[2008]

“–ŽÐ»•i‚ÍLumigan(R)(bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) 0.03%, or Lumigan(R), Alphagan(R)(brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution) 0.2%, or Alphagan(R), Alphagan(R)P (brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution) 0.15%, or Alphagan(R)P, Alphagan(R)P 0.1% (brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution)0.1%, or Alphagan(R)P 0.1%, Combigan TM (brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate ophthalmic solution) 0.2%/0.5%, or Combigan TM and Ganfort(R)(bimatoprost/timolol maleate ophthalmic solution)B@2007”N1-9ŒŽ¢ŠEƒVƒFƒA18%

Lumigan@—Γàá(bimatoprost ophthalmic solution) 0.03%,
[2010]

Lumigan® 0.03% and Lumigan® 0.01% are topical treatments indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Lumigan 0.01% is an improved reformulation of Lumigan® 0.03%. We currently sell Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% in the United States and over 75 countries worldwide and, together, they are our second best selling eye care products.

According to IMS Health Incorporated, Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% were amongst the best selling glaucoma products in the world for the first nine months of 2010. In 2002, the European Commission approved Lumigan® 0.03%. In 2004, the European Unionfs Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products approved Lumigan® 0.03% as a first-line therapy for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in chronic open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. In 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, approved Lumigan® 0.03% as a first-line therapy. We are party to an exclusive licensing agreement with Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., or Senju, under which Senju became responsible for the development and commercialization of Lumigan® 0.03% in Japan. In 2009, Senju received approval of Lumigan® 0.03% in Japan. Also in 2009, Lumigan® 0.01% was approved by Health Canada. In the first quarter of 2010, the European Commission granted a Marketing Authorization for Lumigan® 0.01% in the European Union member states. During the third quarter of 2010, the FDA approved Lumigan 0.01% as a first-line therapy indicated for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In 2006, we received a license from the European Commission to market Ganfort&trade in the European Union. Ganfort™ is now sold in over 37 countries outside the United States. Combined sales of Lumigan® 0.03%, Lumigan® 0.01% and Ganfort™ represented approximately 11%, 10% and 10% of our total consolidated product net sales in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

[2008]

‚V‚Oƒ•‘‚Ŕ̔„A2007”N1-9ŒŽ¢ŠEƒVƒFƒA‘æ‚RˆÊB
2002.3 EU³”FB@2004.1 EU-CHMP‚Ífirst-line therapy‚Æ‚µ‚ij”FB
@•Ä‘FDA‚à2006.6 first-line therapy‚Æ‚µ‚ij”FB
2004.5 çŽõ»–ò‚Ƀ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXA‚±‚ê‚Í2007.6‚É“ú–{‚Å\¿‚³‚ꂽB
Ganfort&trade@—Γàá(bimatoprost/timolol maleate ophthalmic solution)
[2010]

[2008]

In November 2003, we filed a New Drug Application with the FDA for Ganfort(R), a Lumigan(R)and timolol combination designed to treat glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In August 2004, we announced that the FDA issued an approvable letter for Ganfort(R), setting out the conditions, including additional clinical investigation, that we must meet in order to obtain final FDA approval. In May 2006, we received a license from the European Commission to market Ganfort(R)in the European Union. Combined sales of Lumigan(R)and Ganfort(R)represented approximately 10% of our total consolidated product net sales in 2007. Sales of Lumigan(R)represented approximately 11% of our total consolidated product net sales in 2006 and 12% of our total consolidated product net sales in 2005. The decline in the percentage of our total net sales represented by sales of Lumigan(R)primarily resulted from the significant increase in our net sales as a result of the Inamed acquisition.

Alphagan@—Γàá(brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution)
[2010]

Our third best selling eye care products are the ophthalmic solutions Alphagan® , Alphagan® P 0.15% and Alphagan® P 0.1%. These products lower intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous humor production and increasing uveoscleral outflow. Alphagan® P 0.15% and Alphagan® P 0.1% are improved reformulations of Alphagan containing brimonidine, the active ingredient in Alphagan® , preserved with Purite . We currently market Alphagan® , Alphagan® P 0.15% and Alphagan® P 0.1% in over 70 countries worldwide. In 2002, based on the acceptance of Alphagan® P 0.15%, we discontinued the U.S. distribution of Alphagan . We are party to an exclusive licensing agreement with Senju, under which Senju is responsible for the development and commercialization of Alphagan® and Alphagan® P 0.15% in Japan. The marketing exclusivity period for Alphagan® P 0.1% expired in 2008 and Alphagan® P 0.15 % now faces generic competition in the United States, although we have a number of patents covering the Alphagan® P 0.1% and Alphagan® P 0.15% technology that extend to 2022 in the United States. In 2003, the FDA approved the first generic of Alphagan® . Additionally, a generic form of Alphagan® is sold in a limited number of other countries, including Canada, Mexico, India, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina and in the European Union.

[2008]

‚V‚Oƒ•‘‚Ŕ̔„A2007”N1-9ŒŽ¢ŠEƒVƒFƒA‘æ‚TˆÊB
Alphagan(R) P‚Ì2006”N”­”„‚É”º‚¢AAlphagan‚͕đ”Ì”„’†Ž~B@
2004.5 ˆÇ—Ñ»–ò‚É“Æèƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXB@ˆÇ—Ñ‚ÍçŽõ»–ò‚ɃTƒuƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXB
2003.5 Alphagan‚̉ƒWƒFƒlƒŠƒbƒN‚ªFDA³”FB
The marketing exclusivity period for Alphagan(R)P expired in the United States in September 2004 and the marketing exclusivity period for Alphagan(R)P 0.1% will expire in August 2008, although we have a number of patents covering the Alphagan(R)P and Alphagan(R)P 0.1% technology that extend to 2021 in the United States and 2009 in Europe, with corresponding patents pending in Europe. In May 2003, the FDA approved the first generic of Alphagan(R). Additionally, a generic form of Alphagan(R)is sold in a limited number of other countries, including Canada, Mexico, India, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina. See Item 3 of Part I of this report, gLegal Proceedingsh and Note 13, gCommitments and Contingencies,h in the notes to the consolidated financial statements listed under Item 15 of Part IV of this report, gExhibits and Financial Statement Schedules,h for further information regarding litigation involving Alphagan(R). Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., an affiliate of Alcon Laboratories, Inc., or Alcon, attempted to obtain FDA approval for and to launch a brimonidine product to compete with our Alphagan(R)P product. However, pursuant to a March 2006 settlement with Alcon, Alcon agreed not to sell, offer for sale or distribute its brimonidine product until September 30, 2009, or earlier if specified sales conditions occur. The primary sales condition will have occurred if prescriptions of Alphagan(R)P have been converted to other brimonidine-containing products we market above a specified threshold.
Restasis@ƒhƒ‰ƒCƒAƒC(cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) 0.05%
[2010]

Restasis® (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) 0.05% is the first, and currently the only, prescription therapy for the treatment of chronic dry eye worldwide. Restasis is our best selling eye care product. Chronic dry eye is a painful and irritating condition involving abnormalities and deficiencies in the tear film initiated by a variety of causes. The incidence of chronic dry eye increases markedly with age, after menopause in women and in people with systemic diseases such as Sj€Azgrenfs syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Until the approval of Restasis® , physicians used lubricating tears to provide palliative relief of the debilitating symptoms of chronic dry eye. We launched Restasis® in the United States in 2003 under a license from Novartis AG for the ophthalmic use of cyclosporine. During the third quarter of 2010, Health Canada approved Restasis for the treatment of moderate to moderately severe aqueous deficient dry eye disease. Restasis is currently approved in 41 countries.

Our over-the-counter artificial tears products, including the Refresh® and Refresh® Optive™ brands, treat dry eye symptoms including irritation and dryness due to pollution, computer use, aging and other causes. Refresh , launched in 1986, includes a wide range of preserved and non-preserved drops as well as ointments to treat dry eye symptoms. According to IMS Health Incorporated, an independent marketing research firm, our artificial tears products, including the Refresh® and Refresh® Optive™ brands, were again the number one selling artificial tears products worldwide for the first nine months of 2010.

[2008]

Novartis AG‚©‚烉ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX‚ðŽó‚¯B2003.4 •Ä‘”­”„BŒ»Ý28ƒ•‘‚Ŕ̔„B
2005.4 Novartis‚©‚çRestasisŠÖ˜A‚Ì‘S¢ŠE‚Ì‘SŒ ‚ðroyalty buy-out(‘Šz$110 million)
Prolacria(TM) ƒhƒ‰ƒCƒAƒC(diquafosol tetrasodium), or Prolacria(TM)
[2008]

2001.6 Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc‚©‚ç“ÆèŠJ”­Œ ‚ðŽæ“¾BInspire‚ÉRestasis‚Æ
Prolacria‚̔̔„‚ð”F‚ß‚é‚̂ƌðŠ·B
2003.12 FDA‚Íapprovable letter‚ð”­s‚µ’ljÁ—Õ°ŽŽŒ±‚ð—v‹B@2005.2 Inspire‚Í
primary endpoint‚ł̌ø‰ÊØ–¾Ž¸”s‚ð”­•\B‚»‚ÌŒãsecondary endpoints‚Å‚ÌŽŽŒ±‚ÉŠî‚«
2005Q2‚ÉÄ\¿‚µA2005.12‚É‚Q”Ô–Ú‚Ìapprovable letterŽó—ÌB
Zymar@R‹ÛÜ(gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution) 0.3%@from Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
[2010]

Our leading anti-infective is Zymar® (gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution) 0.3%, which we license from Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and have worldwide ophthalmic commercial rights excluding Japan, Korea, Taiwan and certain other countries in Asia and Europe. We launched Zymar® in the United States in 2003. Zymar® is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis and is currently approved in 33 countries. Laboratory studies have shown that Zymar® kills the most common bacteria that cause eye infections as well as specific resistant bacteria. During the second quarter of 2010, we received FDA approval of Zymaxid® (gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution) 0.5%, our next-generation anti-infective product indicated for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. In February 2011, we announced the discontinuation of Zymar® due to strong physician acceptance of Zymaxid® with its increased concentration.

[2008]

ƒAƒWƒA‚𜂭‘S¢ŠE‚ÌŒ —˜Šl“¾B‘æŽl¢‘ã‚ÌR‹ÛÜ‚Å29ƒ•‘‚ų”FB
•Ä‘‚Å‚Í2003.4”­”„B2007”N‚͕đ‚ÅŠá‰ÈŠ´õǂłQ”Ԗڂ̈•ûŒ”B@‹àŠz‚ł͢ŠE‘æ‚RˆÊA•Ä‘‘æ“ñˆÊB
[2010]






œAllergan

¡Investors œEarnings Releases Q4 Allergan Reports Fourth Quarter 2010 Operating Results[2011.1] Q4 Allergan Reports Fourth Quarter 2009 Operating Results [2010.1 2008 Q4 Allergan Reports Fourth Quarter Operating Results [2009.1] 2007 Q4 Allergan Reports Fourth Quarter Operating Results[2008.1.30] œFinancial Reports 10-K Annual Report[2011.3.1] - [pdf] 10-K Annual Report[2010.2.26] - [pdf] 2009 Annual Report 10-K Annual Report[2009.2.27] - [pdf] 2008 Annual Report 10-K Annual Report[2008.2.28] - [pdf,188p] 2007 Annual Report - [pdf,16p] œProducts œPress Releases
œƒAƒ‰ƒKƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ

œ“ú–{ 2002”N7ŒŽ1“ú•t‚ð‚à‚¿‚Ü‚µ‚ÄAƒAƒ‰ƒKƒ“Дޮ‰ïŽÐ‚ÍAˆã–ò•iŽ–‹Æ‚ðŽæ‚èˆµ‚¤uƒAƒ‰ƒKƒ“Дޮ ‰ïŽÐv‚ÆŠá‰Èˆã—Êí‹ï‹y‚уRƒ“ƒ^ƒNƒgƒŒƒ“ƒYƒPƒAŽ–‹Æ‚ðŽæ‚èˆµ‚¤uƒGƒCƒGƒ€ƒI[EƒWƒƒƒpƒ“ Дޮ‰ïŽÐv‚Ì2ŽÐ‚É•ªŠ„‚¢‚½‚µ‚Ü‚µ‚½B ƒ{ƒcƒŠƒkƒXƒgƒLƒVƒ“—Ö@Œ¤‹†‰ïFŠááÙEŠç–Ê‚¯‚¢‚ê‚ñ^áz«ŽÎèò‚̃y[ƒW -http://www.btx-a.net/




¡Allos Therapeutics, Inc

(Nasdaq: ALTH)headquartered in Westminster, Colorado
1992.09.01 HemoTech Sciences, Inc‚Æ‚µ‚ÄÝ—§B
1994.10.19 Allos Therapeutics, Inc‚ɎЖ¼•ÏX
2000”N‚ÉŠ”Ž®ŒöŠJ


œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ 000)20092008200720062005
”„ã‚3,585----
‰c‹Æ—˜‰v(74,010)(53,639)(42,664)(32,128)(21,905)
Œoí—˜‰v(73,630)(51,730)(39,370)(30,212)(20,137)
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(73,553)(51,730)(39,370)(30,212)20,137
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï32,61830,59522,99216,60612,481
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]170
œFOLOTYN€mV (pralatrexate injection)@PTCLŽ¡—Öò
y2009zWe are currently focused on the development and commercialization of FOLOTYN€mV (pralatrexate injection). FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate preferentially in cancer cells. FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR, an enzyme critical in the folate pathway, thereby interfering with DNA and RNA synthesis and triggering cancer cell death. FOLOTYN can be delivered as a single agent, for which we currently have approval for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T.cell lymphoma, or PTCL, and has the potential to be used in combination therapy regimens. We believe that FOLOTYN's unique mechanism of action offers us the ability to target the drug for development in a variety of hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications. We currently retain exclusive worldwide commercial rights to FOLOTYN for all indications. We may also seek to grow our product portfolio through product acquisition and in.licensing efforts.

On September 24, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, granted accelerated approval of FOLOTYN for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. This approval was based on overall response rate from our pivotal PROPEL trial. Clinical benefit such as improvement in progression.free survival or overall survival has not been demonstrated. FOLOTYN represents our first drug approved for marketing in the United States. FOLOTYN is the first and only drug approved by the FDA for this indication and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. In connection with the accelerated approval, we are required to conduct several post.approval studies. We began making FOLOTYN available for commercial sale in the United States on October 5, 2009 and commenced our commercial launch in January 2010 with approximately 50 sales specialists.

FOLOTYN is a targeted antifolate inhibitor designed to accumulate preferentially in cancer cells. Based on preclinical studies, we believe that FOLOTYN selectively enters cells expressing RFC.1, a protein that is over expressed on cancer cells compared to normal cells. Once inside cancer cells, FOLOTYN is efficiently polyglutamylated, which makes it less susceptible to efflux.based drug resistance and leads to high intracellular drug retention. Inside the cell, FOLOTYN targets the inhibition of DHFR, an enzyme critical in the folate pathway, thereby interfering with DNA and RNA synthesis and triggering cancer cell death.

The antimetabolites, including antifolates such as FOLOTYN, are a group of low.molecular weight compounds that exert their effect by virtue of their structural or functional similarity to naturally occurring molecules involved in DNA synthesis. Because the cell mistakes them for a normal metabolite, the antimetabolites either inhibit critical enzymes involved in DNA synthesis or become incorporated into the nucleic acid, producing incorrect codes. Both mechanisms result in inhibition of DNA synthesis and ultimately, cell death. Because of their primary effect on DNA synthesis, the antimetabolites are most effective against actively dividing cells and are largely cell.cycle phase specific. There are three classes of antimetabolites; purine analogs, pyrimidine analogs and folic acid analogs, also termed antifolates. FOLOTYN is a folic acid analog.

The selectivity of antifolates for tumor cells involves their conversion to a polyglutamated form by the enzyme folypolyglutamyl synthetase. Polyglutamation is a time. and concentration.dependent process that occurs in tumor cells, and to a lesser extent, normal tissue. The selective activity of the folic acid analogs in malignant cells versus normal cells likely is due to the relative difference in polyglutamate formation. Polyglutamated metabolites have prolonged intracellular half.life, increased duration of drug action and are potent inhibitors of several folate.dependent enzymes, including DHFR.

We believe that the resistance of malignant cells to the effects of the folic acid analogs may, in part, be due to impaired polyglutamation. We believe the improved antitumor effects of FOLOTYN in comparison to methotrexate, as observed in preclinical studies, is likely due to the more effective uptake and transport of FOLOTYN into the cell followed by the greater accumulation of FOLOTYN and its metabolites within the tumor cell through the formation of the polyglutamated derivatives.

Competition

There are currently no FDA.approved drugs other than FOLOTYN for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. However, we are aware of multiple investigational agents that are currently being studied in clinical trials for T.cell lymphoma, including romidepsin and belinostat, which, if successful, may compete with FOLOTYN in the United States. In addition, there are many existing approaches used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory PTCL, including combination chemotherapy and single agent regimens, which represent competition for FOLOTYN.

Many companies of all sizes, including a number of large pharmaceutical companies and several biotechnology companies, are developing product candidates that have disease targets similar to those we are pursuing. Some of these competitive product candidates are in clinical trials and others are approved. There are products and technologies currently on the market that will compete directly with FOLOTYN. Universities, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations also conduct research and may market commercial products on their own or through joint ventures. These companies and institutions also compete with us in recruiting qualified scientific personnel. Many of these entities may have:

œAllos Therapeutics, Inc

œProducts FOLOTYN ¡Investors œFinancial Reports - SEC Filings 10-K Annual report[2010.3.1] - [pdf] - [doc] - [xls] œNews

Allos Therapeutics' Pralatrexate Granted Orphan Medicinal Product Designation for the Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma by the European Commission[2010.10.15]
Allos Therapeutics Announces Presentation of Favorable Survival Data from Randomized Phase 2b Study of FOLOTYN(R) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[2010.10.11]
Allos Therapeutics Announces FOLOTYN(R) Data Presentation at the 35th ESMO Congress[2010.9.9]
Allos Therapeutics Announces Topline Results from Phase 2b Study of FOLOTYN in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[2010.7.18]
Allos Therapeutics' Pralatrexate Granted Orphan Medicinal Product Designation for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma by the European Commission[2010.6.17]
Allos Therapeutics' FOLOTYN Shows Activity and Tolerability in Phase 1 Dose Finding Study in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CTCL[2010.6.11]
Allos Therapeutics Reports New Data Demonstrating that Responses to FOLOTYN are Correlated with Prolonged Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory PTCL[2010.6.5]
Allos Therapeutics' Pralatrexate Granted FDA Orphan Drug Designation for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer[2007.5.18]
Allos Therapeutics Announces an Agreement with Idis for a Named Patient Program for FOLOTYN(TM) (pralatrexate injection)[2009.12.4]
Therapeutics Announces U.S. Availability of FOLOTYN(TM) (pralatrexate injection) for Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma[2009.10.5]
Allos Therapeutics' FOLOTYN(TM) First and Only FDA-Approved Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma[2009.9.25]
Allos Therapeutics Announces FDA Advisory Committee Recommends Accelerated Approval of FOLOTYN(TM) (pralatrexate) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma[2009.9.2]
U.S FDA Grants Pralatrexate Orphan Drug Designation for the Treatment of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma[2008.12.1]
U.S. FDA Grants Pralatrexate Orphan Drug Designation for the Treatment of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma[2008.11.24]
[]
[]





¡Almirall Prodesfarma, S.A.

 - http://www.almirall.es/
1943  Laboratorios Almirall, S.AÝ—§
1960  Prodes S.A.Ý—§B@ʼn‚Ì»•iProdesmicina
1964  ʼn‚̃WƒGƒlƒŠƒbƒNDiazepan Prodes
1979  ‰‚ÌŽ©ŽÐŠJ”­•iclebopride”­”„BŠCŠOƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX
1983  Funk S.A. and Berenguer Beneyto S.A.‚𔃎ûB
1985  ‹ÇŠ—pÁ‰ŠÜpiketoprofen”­”„B
1986  Infale S.A”ƒŽûB
1987  Almirall ‚ª‘“àmarket leader‚ƂȂéB
1990  Farmasimes[ƒXƒyƒCƒ“]‹y‚Ñ Sintesa[ƒxƒ‹ƒM[]‚𔃎ûB
      gastroprokinetic cinitapride‚Ì”­”„.
@@@RƒqƒXƒ^ƒ~ƒ“Ü ebastine”­”„B@‘Ûƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX
1991  Prasfarma (Asta Medica‚Ƈ•Ù)‚ðSpain‚ÉÝ—§B
1992  R‰ŠÇÜaceclofenac”­”„B
1993  Probios‚̤‹ÆŠˆ“®‚ðƒ|ƒ‹ƒgƒKƒ‹‚ÅŠJŽnB
1995  R‰ŠÇÜaceclofenac‚ð“ìƒA, Portugal and Korea‚Å”­”„B
1996  aceclofenac‚ð‰p‘”­”„B
@@@ebastine‚ð“ú–{‚Å”­”„B
1997  Grupo Farmaceutico Almirall S.A. and the Grupo Prodesfarma. ‚ª‡•¹‚µ
@@@Almirall Prodesfarma S.A.
2000  •Гª’É–òalmotriptan‚ª‰¢B16ƒJ‘‚Å‘ŠŒÝ³”FAƒXƒyƒCƒ“”­”„AFDA³”FB
2001  almotriptan‚̉¢B‹y‚ÑEEUU”­”„B
@@@Prasfarma(ŠàE•a‰@»•i)”ƒŽû
@@@•§»–ò‰ïŽÐPharmafarm”ƒŽû
@@@ƒtƒ‰ƒ“ƒX‚Åebastine”­”„
2002  “ÆEˆÉEƒ|ƒ‹ƒgƒKƒ‹‚Åebastine”­”„B
2005  Prasfarma‚ðMerck KGaA‚É”„‹pA’A‚µƒXƒyƒCƒ“‚Å‚ÌCampto(irinotecan)‚Ì‹¤“¯”Ì”„
@@@Œ ‚Í—¯•ÛB

œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZi‚P‚QŒŽj
(Euro million)  2005—\@2004  2003  2002  2001
”„ã‚@@@@@ 946     900   886   833   734
@‚¤‚¿»•iŽû“ü@ 750     738   676   632   583
      
@@@‘“à”„ã@ 564 559 523 487 439 @@@‘ŠO”„ã@ 186 179 153 145 144 Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï@@@ 104 88 85 75 56 ]‹Æˆõ”@@@@3227 3196 3200 2843 2605 @‚¤‚¿Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­ 500 508 516 508 425 œŒ¤‹†ŠJ”­Žå—Í•ª–ì @šb‘§ACOPDAAŠ£áAƒŠƒEƒ}ƒ` œŠJ”­’†‚ÌV–ò(Ž©ŽÐ•i) LAS 34273 Bronchitis / asthma P-II / III LAS 35201 Bronchitis / asthma P-I / II LAS 37779 Psoriasis P-I FROM Molecules under development œŠJ”­’†‚ÌV–ò(“±“ü•i)@from News Sativex(R) P3 ‘½”­«d‰»Ç GW Pharmaceuticals (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol(THC)& cannabidiol(CBD))@*GW‘n»A2005.4ƒJƒiƒ_³”F blonanserin(AD-5423) P2 “‡Ž¸’²ÇŽ¡—ÃÜ 2001.5 ‘å“ú–{Z—F‚©‚ç‘S¢ŠEƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX
œAlmirall Prodesfarma, S.A.

- http://www.almirall.es/ Strategic alliances @- Ž©ŽÐŠJ”­•i‚Ì“±oæE‘E–Á•¿–¼ˆê——B@“±“ü•i–ڈꗗ œProducts E almotriptan (•Гª’É) E ebastine (RƒqƒXƒ^ƒ~ƒ“)@|ƒGƒoƒXƒeƒ‹[‘å“ú–{Z—F]”­”„ E aceclofenac (R‰ŠÇ) E almagate (§Ž_Ü) E cinitapride (gastroprocinetic) E clebopride (ˆÝ’×ᇎ¡—ÃÜgastroprocinetic) |ƒNƒ‰ƒXƒgù[–¾Ž¡»‰Ù]”­”„ E piketoprofen (R‰ŠÇ) œCommunication - Almirall reaches sales figures of 900 million euros in 2004[2005.4.4] - ALMIRALL HAS TAKEN THE STRATEGIC DECISION OF REGISTERING ALMOTRIPTAN IN JAPAN[2004.6.9] -“ú–{‚ł̊J”­ œR&D Molecules under development




¡Alpharma Inc.

Alpharma Inc. (NYSE:ALO),
 is a multinational pharmaceutical company with global leadership positions in products for humans and animals
Grande Commons, 440 U.S. Highway 22 East,3rd Floor, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 908-566-3800
With 1,355 employees and revenues of $654 million, Alpharma is active in more than 60 countries around the world. Founded in Norway in 1903, Alpharma is currently positioned for growth atop three strong anchors: pharmaceutical products (KADIAN(R) capsules and the FLECTOR(R) Patch), animal health and active pharmaceutical ingredients. Together, these business units provide operational efficiencies and enable the company to continue to deliver sustainable growth and long-term value.



œAlpharma Inc.

-http://www.alpharma.com/pages/default.aspx œOur Businesses šKADIAN(R) capsules(morphine sulfate extended-release Capsules) šFLECTOR(R) Patch(diclofenac epolamine topical patch) œNews Room Alpharma Reports Double-Digit Full Year and Fourth Quarter 2007 Revenue Growth [2008.2.26] The First and Only Anti-Inflammatory Pain Release Patch in the U.S. - FLECTOR(R) Patch - Now Available[2008.1.23] Alpharma Licenses Novel NSAID Topical Pain Drug [2007.9.5] - P3’iŠK‚É‚ ‚éketoprofen in Transfersome(R) gel‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚ĕđ“ÆèŒ ‚ð“ÆIDEA AG‚©‚çŠl“¾‚µ‚½B @IDEA AG ‚Í2007.5 Europefor ketoprofen in Transfersome(R) gel‚̕ό`ŠÖßǂ̓K‰ž‚Å\¿‚µ‚½B Alpharma to Market First Topical NSAID Patch in the U.S.[2007.8.21] - •Ä‘‰‚ÌNSAIDƒpƒbƒ`ÜFlector Patch‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚ÄAInstitut Biochimique SA‚©‚ç•Ä‘“Æè”Ì”„Œ ‚ðŠl“¾B ‰¢B‚Å‚ÍIBSA‚ª”Ì”„‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚éB@1993”N‚ŃXƒCƒX‚ʼn³”FAˆÈ—ˆ39ƒ•‘‚ų”FB




¡Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc

 - http://www.alseres.com/index.asp; (NASDAQ: ALSE)
85 Main Street, Hopkinton, MA 01748 Tel: (508) 497-2360 Fax: (508) 497-9964
‘n—§1992

Boston Life Sciences, Inc. Changes Name to Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2007.6.8]


œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ )2008200720062005200420032002
”„ã‚-------
‰c‹Æ”ï—p18,710,81218,881,12526,434,73611,647,98410,381,4297,914,88710,302,008
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(20,847,459)(19,548,348)(26,355,243)(11,501,442)(11,250,877)(8,367,994)(10,993,142)
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï10,851,84410,475,15818,538,1866,127,4866,400,132
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]272727
¡ŠJ”­’†‚ÌV–ò@/2008.3.13
»•i“K‰ž’iŠK”õl
¡Regenerative Therapeutics
CNS
Cethrin®Acute spinal cord injuryP2
2007.1 BioAxone Therapeutic Inc. of Montreal, Canada‚©‚ç‘S¢ŠE“ÆèŠJ”­”Ì”„Œ ‚ðŠl“¾Ba Rho InhibitorB@•Ä‘‚Å‚ÍÒ‘‘¹‚ª–ˆ”N11,000Œ”­¶‚µAŒ»Ýmethylprednisolone‚Ì“K‰žŠOŽg—p‚ª—Bˆê‚ÌŽ¡—Ö@
InosineStroke, SCI‘O—Õ°I—¹
ALSE-100, etal.Chronic SCI, TBIŒ¤‹†’†
OCULAR
OncomodulinOptic Nerve Injury/
Glaucoma
Œ¤‹†’†
ALSE-100Glaucoma/macular degeneration/
retinis pigmentosa
Œ¤‹†’†
BONE
ALSE-100Bone repair/
osteo-induction
‘O—Õ°I—¹
CARDIOVASCULAR
ALSE-100, etal.CardiomyopathyŒ¤‹†’†
¡Molecular Imaging
šALTROPANE(R)(123I-SPECT)Parkinson's Diseasef’fP3I—¹Œëf—¦25-35%‚ð‰ü‘P
Tc-based agentsParkinson's Disease / ADHD‘O—Õ°I—¹
¡DAT Blocker(Dopamine Transporter Blocker)
DAT BlockerParkinson's Disease‘O—Õ°I—¹‚RŽí
from Product-Pipeline šCethrin(R) -- In January 2007, enrollment was initiated at the 9 mg dosage level in our Phase I/IIa trial of Cethrin at sites in Canada. In June 2007, the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, authorized an increase in the dose level to 9 mg for sites in the U.S. Each authorized dose is first given to thoracic SCI subjects and then, following review by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, or DSMB, the dose is extended to cervical subjects. In September 2007, the DSMB unanimously authorized expanding the 9 mg dose to include cervical subjects. -- In September 2007, the Company had a preliminary meeting with the European Medicines Agency to review our proposed clinical development plan for CETHRIN. In October 2007, the Company met with the FDA to review the Phase I/IIa results and its CETHRIN clinical development plan. The Company plans to meet with Health Canada in early 2008 for the same purpose. Based on discussions to date with the regulatory authorities and expert advisors, the Company is planning to begin a Phase IIb trial at sites in North America and Europe in the first half of 2008. from Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2007 Financial Results and Provides Development Pipeline Update[2007.11.14]
œAlseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc

œProduct-Pipeline ¡Investor Relations œFinancial Information šSEC Filings 10-K annual report[2009.3.31] 10-K annual report[2008.3.31] 10-K annual report[2007.4.2] šAnnual Reports œPress Releases Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2007 Financial Results and Provides Development Pipeline Update[2007.11.14] Boston Life Sciences, Inc. Changes Name to Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc.[2007.6.8] Alseres Pharmaceuticals Concludes Enrollment in the Cethrin(R) Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial in Acute Spinal Cord Injury[2008.1.7] QSV Biologics, Ltd. and, Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sign Contract for cGMP Manufacture of Cethrin(R) for Spinal Cord Injury[2007.7.10] Alseres Pharmaceuticals Announces FDA Clearance to Increase Dose Level in Cethrin(R) Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial for Acute Spinal Cord Injury at U.S. Sites[2007.6.27] Boston Life Sciences Acquires Rights to Develop and Commercialize Promising Phase II
Spinal Cord Injury Drug, Cethrin(R), in Exclusive Worldwide License
[2007.1.4]




¡Altana AG

 - http://www.altana.de/root/index.php

ALTANA AG completes sale of pharmaceuticals business to Nycomed[2006.12.29]

œŒˆŽZ[˜AŒ‹]
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚3,8673,2722,9632,735(+5)2,6092,3081,928

ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ2,5732,3652,1091,9801,8611,5911,262
@‰»ŠwŽ–‹Æ1,294907854755748717666

‰c‹Æ—˜‰v676604563(+5)538
Œoí—˜‰vEBT779684(+14)624580(+10)526448329
ƒ—˜‰v3,872438379345(+6)324256179
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï495(+6)465448412(+12)369285219
@ˆã–ò427418[17.7%]410(+8)[19.4%]376[19.0%]335252190
@‰»Šw68473836343329
]‹Æˆõ”13,40413,27610,783(+4)10,402(+6)9,8539,1228,556
@ˆã–ò8,920(+1)8,8328,200(+6)7,7027,5046,8676,489
@‚¤‚¿Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­1,656(+9)1,514(+18)1,2811,052927
@‰»Šw4,4844,3842,5212,6342,2992,2172,036
œ’nˆæ•Ê[‘S‘Ì]
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000
‰¢B627454
‹Œ1,674
1,504
@‚¤‚¿“Æ223142
‹Œ581
491
–k•Ä268156
‹Œ927
880
@‚¤‚¿•Ä‘243144
‹Œ796
769
’†“ì•Ä--
‹Œ327
278
‹É“Œ297214
‹Œ285
250
‚»‚Ì‘¼10283
‹Œ59
51
‡Œv1,294907
‹Œ3,272
2,963
œ’nˆæ•Ê[ˆã–ò]
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ2,573(+9)2,365(+12)2,109(+7)1,980(+6)1,8611,5911,262

‰¢B1,227(+1)1,219(+16)1,050(+8)972(+4)932
@‚¤‚¿ƒhƒCƒc380(-14)439(+18)371(-1)375(-4)390
–k•Ä936(+22)770(+3)749(+2)732(+16)633
@‚¤‚¿•Ä‘761(+17)651(+1)647(+1)638
’†“ì•Ä311(+12)279(+19)235(+10)213(-10)236
‚»‚Ì‘¼99(+3)97(+29)75(+18)63(+5)60
œƒZƒOƒƒ“ƒg•Ê
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„ã‚3,8673,2722,9632,735(+5)2,6092,3081,928

ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ2,573(+9)2,365(+12)2,109(+7)1,9801,8611,5911,262

@@Ž¡—Öò2,261(+9)2,071(+13)1,839(+7)1,7241,5651,275980
@@@@Á‰»Ší1,702(+11)1,536(+12)1,367(+10)1,241(+15)1,083795
@@@@ŒÄ‹zŠí83(+20)69(+17)59(-1)59(+3)5753
@@@@‚»‚Ì‘¼476466(+13)413(-3)424(-)425427
@@Imaging108(-1)108(-)109(+3)10610091
@@(OTC)149(+14)131(+13)115(+11)104110129
@@‚»‚Ì‘¼55(+0)55(+19)46(-)468696
@@‡Œv2,573(+9)2,365(+12)2,109(+7)1,9801,8611,591

@‰»ŠwŽ–‹Æ1,294(+43)907854755748717666

@@“Y‰ÁÜE‹@Ší
(Additives & Instruments)
409(+13)364348(+13)308304--
@@“d‹C’f”MÜ
(Electrical Insulation)
325(+11)293291(+29)225223--
@@“h—¿EƒV[ƒ‹
(Coatings & Sealants)
221(+26)175215(-3)222221--
@@Effect Pigments339(+13)75-----
@@‡Œv1,294(+43)907854755748717666
* ˆã–òŽ–‹Æ‚ª81%A‚¤‚¿–k•Ä‚ª37% œ»•i”„ã‚
(Euro milllion)200620052004200320022001”õl

Pantoprazole1,551(+14)[69%]1,361(+12)[57.6%]1,216[57.6%]1,113[26.2%]966680(Protozol)’×á‡
Alvesco18.28.1(-)---[cicletanide]šb‘§G”­”„2005.1
Contrast media10510610070
Ebrantil(R)67666361[urapidil]~ˆ³Ü;ƒ¿ŽÕ’fÜ
Ferro29-3033[ferro polymaltose]“SÜ
Riopan(R)28303334[Magaldrat]§Ž_ÜE‹¹‚₯
Facial Topicals--26-
Theophylline--2526Euphyllin/Euphylong
Querto(R)--2423[Carvedilol]from Roche;“Á‹–Ø‚ê2004
Sanostol(R)--2017[]ƒrƒ^ƒ~ƒ“Ü
Chromagen--1618“SÜ–2003.6 KV Pharmaceuticals‚É”„‹p
CroFab(TM)-29-17ŽÖ“Å
𑢉eÜ(Bracco S.p.A.‚Æ’ñŒg,) @Imeron & Solutrast - CT‚Ì‘‰Á‚ÅD’² @ProHance & MultiHance - Magnetic resonance‘¢‰eÜ(MRI) šciclesonide (Alvesco) - ŠvV“I‚È‹z“üƒXƒeƒƒCƒhFšb‘§ (Eur1 Billion—\‘z) [2005] (1990”N‘㉂߃XƒyƒCƒ“ELMUQUIMICAŽÐ”ƒŽû‚É‚æ‚èŽæ“¾) \¿Ï‚Ý(2002)@--- ‰pAƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒAAƒJƒiƒ_‘¼ (2003) --- ƒTƒmƒtƒBƒAƒxƒ“ƒeƒBƒX‚ª2003.––‚ɕđ\¿B(Œ_–ñ2002) (2004) --- ’él‚ª“ú–{‚Å2004.1\¿B(Œ_–ñ1998) ³”F --- Australian Health Agency‚ª2004.2 ¢ŠE‰³”FB @”­”„@@(2005.1)--- ‰pE“Æ”­”„@2005––‚P‚Uƒ•‘‚Ŕ̔„A‚R‚Sƒ•‘³”F @“_•@–òF2005.12 FDA\¿ by Altana [2004] ³”FÏ‚Ý(2004)@--- ‰p2004.4AƒI[ƒXƒgƒ‰ƒŠƒA2004.2Aƒuƒ‰ƒWƒ‹EƒƒLƒVƒR2004.8 @@@@@@@@@@@•Ä‘Approvable Letter‚ð2004.10Žó—Ì @@@@@@@@@@@EU‘ŠŒÝ³”FŽè‘±‚«[MRP]2004.12Š®—¹ ”­”„ (2005) --- ‰p‘2005.1AƒhƒCƒc2005.2 šroflumilast (Daxas) - COPDŽ¡—Öò (Eur1 Billion—\‘z)ŠvV“IPDE4‘jŠQÜ [2004] \¿Ï‚Ý(2004)@--- EU2004.2 @—Õ°ŽŽŒ±(2004)@@@•Ä‘Pfizer‚Íšb‘§ECOPD‚ÅP3ŽŽŒ±ŽÀŽ{A“ú–{‚Ì“c•Ó‚Í @@@@@@@@@@@šb‘§‚ÅBridging study‚ðŠJŽnB [2003] ECOPD‚Í"Smoker's lung"‚Æ‚µ‚Ä’m‚ç‚êA¢ŠE‚SˆÊ‚ÌŽ€ˆöB E“ÁˆÙ“IPDE‘jŠQÜ‚ÅR‰ŠÇì—p‚ª‚ ‚éB @COPD‚Æšb‘§‚̗Ö@‚É—LŒø‚Å‚ ‚邱‚Æ‚ðŽÀØ‚µ‚½Å‰‚Ì“ÁˆÙ“IPDE4‘jŠQÜ E2002”NˆÈ—ˆPfizer‚Æ‹¤“¯ŠJ”­B“ú–{‚Í“c•Ó»–ò‚Æ‹¤“¯ŠJ”­E‹¤“¯”Ì”„ ERECORD study‚ð2003.9ŠJŽnB@—LŒø«EˆÀ‘S«‚Ì‚½‚ßB EEU\¿2004.2 œƒpƒ“ƒgƒvƒ‰ƒ][ƒ‹
(Euro milllion)2006200520042003200220012000

”„㇌v2,882(+4)2,768(+12)2,481(+6)2,350(+17)2,0071,326650

@Ž©ŽÐ”„㕪1,551(+14)1,361(+12)1,2161,113966680411

@“Æ226(-23)292(+40)210(+9)193(+6)182
@•§155(+36)114(+37)83
@ˆÉ95(+20)79(+14)70
@ƒXƒyƒCƒ“116(+23)94(+34)70
@‰p38(+13)34(+56)22
@‘¼‚̉¢B277(+17)237(+25)190
‰¢B@Œv1,030(-2)1,049
‹Œ757(+11)
681
@•Ä‘1,429(+5)1,356(+6)1,281
@ƒJƒiƒ_212(+21)175(+19)147
–k•Ä@Œv1,641(+7)1,5311,428(-2)1,456(+17)1,247
’†“ì•Ä64(+21)52(+11)48(+3)46(-11)52
‚»‚Ì‘¼147(+8)136(+18)114(+17)97(+7)91
* ƒhƒCƒcPantozol, •Ä‘‚Å‚ÍProtonix[Wyeth] [”N•ñ2005] 1995¢ŠE”­”„ˆÈ—ˆAŒ»Ý100ƒ•‘‚Ŕ̔„B PPI¢ŠEŽsê‹K–Í Euro 14 million(2005) * pantoprazole‚ÌPPIŽsêƒVƒFƒA20%(2005•Ä‘)16%(2003) * Žs‹µ(2003) esomeprazole‚Ì”­”„A‹y‚ÑGeneric“oꂪ‚ ‚Á‚½B@‚µ‚©‚µŒ˜’²‚ÈL‚ÑB ‚µ‚©‚µ”ƒJ‘‚Å‚Íomeprazole‚̉e‹¿‚ ‚èB ÜŒ^‚ÍùÜ(20mg,40mg)A’ŽËÜ * “Á‹– @•Ä‘“Á‹–‚ª‚T”NŠÔ‰„’·‚µA2010”N7–––˜‚ÉB @‰¢B‚Í2009”N‚Ü‚ÅB * ‘æˆê»–ò‚Æ1993.2.22‚Ƀ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXŒ_–ñB@2000.10‚ÉŒ_–ñI—¹B Daiichi termination agreement On February 22, 1993, the Company and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. entered into a licensing agreement pertaining to the development and commercialization of Pantoprazole by Daiichi in Japan. Daiichi terminated the agreement effective October 2000. Under the termination agreement, Daiichi agreed to pay the Company a total of Euro18.4 million in three annual installments as a settlement for termination. These payments are non-refundable and release Daiichi completely from its obligation under the licensing agreement. The first installment, totaling Euro6.1 million was paid during 2000. The second installment, was paid on October 1, 2001. The final installment, is due on October 1, 2002. In 2000, the Company initially recorded only the first installment as other income. The financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, have been restated to reflect the entire settlement as other income in the year 2000 as ALTANA has no future obligations or commitments with respect to the termination of the licensing agreements or resulting payments. œŽå—v“Á‹–ŠúŒÀ
»•i‰¢B(1)•Ä‘“ú–{
ciclesonide(•¨Ž¿)2011(2)2013(3)2011(3)
ciclesonide(Key’†ŠÔ‘Ì)201420152014
ciclesonide(¸»H’ö)201720192017
ciclesonide(ƒGƒAƒ][ƒ‹)201820182018
ciclesonide(“_•@»Ü)202020202020
roflumilast(•¨Ž¿)2014(3)2015(3)2014(3)
roflumilast(Ȇ)202320232023
soraprazan(•¨Ž¿)2019(3)2019(3)2019(3)
(1)Žå—v‘‚̉¢B“Á‹–‚Ü‚½‚ÍŠe‘“Á‹– (2)‰¢B‚Å‚Í2016”N–˜ŠúŠÔ‰„’·‚Ì‚½‚ß‚ÌSPC‚ª”F‚ß‚ç‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚éB (3)“Á‹–ŠúŠÔ‰„’·‚ª‚T”NŠÔ–˜”F‚ß‚ç‚ê‚邪A‚±‚ê‚𔽉f‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚È‚¢B *SEC 20-F Annual Report 2005
œAltana AG

œPress Release ALTANA AG: Excellent business year 2006[2007.1.26] ALTANA AG completes sale of pharmaceuticals business to Nycomed[2006.12.29] - ¡Investor Relations œPublications Annual Report 2006[pdf,188p] - Interactive Annual Report 2005[pdf,188p] - Interactive --- ˆã–ò35-54; 174p Žq‰ïŽÐ‚ÆŽŠ””ä—¦MAJOR CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES SEC-Filing 20-F 2005[pdf,196p] Annual Report 2004[pdf,172p] - Interactive --- ˆã–ò27-44, ŠJ”­•i–ڈꗗ42p; 164p Žq‰ïŽÐ‚ÆŽŠ””ä—¦MAJOR CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES SEC-Filing 20-F 2004[pdf,p] Annual Report 2003[pdf,164p] --- ˆã–ò24-39, ŠJ”­•i–ڈꗗ36p; 149p Žq‰ïŽÐ‚ÆŽŠ””ä—¦MAJOR CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES SEC-Filing 20-F 2003 Annual Report 2002 Annual Report 2001[pdf, 124p] - Geschaftsbericht 2001 --- ˆã–ò30-, ŠJ”­•i–ڈꗗ36p œR&D/Products Pharmaceuticals research & development Top ten products
œAltana Pharma AG[‹ŒByk-Gulden AG]

@--- Altana AG‚Ì»–ò•”–åB@”NŠÔ”„ãEuro 1.6 Billion(1860‰­‰~)[2001]A]‹Æˆõ‘”7500A¢ŠE20‚©‘‚ÉŽxŽÐB œNews March 21, 2003šALTANA closes 2002 with seventh consecutive record year: œProducts - pantoprazole[—v“o˜^] Therapy & Diagnosis - ‘債‚½“à—e‚͂Ȃ¢

œ“ú–{

ALTANA Pharma KK,Osaka (J) 100% BYK-Chemie Japan KK, Osaka (J) 100%




¡Alza Corporation

@- June 22, 2001 J&J‚ÌŠ®‘SŽq‰ïŽÐ‚ƂȂéB@]‹Æˆõ”3000lˆÈã[•Ä‘“à‚Ì‚Ý]
@]‚Á‚ÄŒˆŽZ‚ÍAJ&J‚Ås‚¢AŒÂ•ÊŒˆŽZ‚Í”ñŒöŠJB
@’A‚µAƒTƒCƒg‚Í‘¶‘±B

œAlza Corporation Annual Report 2000-Financial section[36p]

3p ALZA Corporation 2000 Annual Report[27] Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations œ”„ã‚
(Dollars in millions)200019991998”õl
œALZA Pharmaceuticals
Ditropan XL(R) 179.086.9(+84)47.2[oxybutynin Cl]‰ßŠˆ“®äNã÷;”­”„1999Q1
Doxil(R)/‰¢BCaelyx(R)82.4(+24)66.2(+37)48.4[doxorubicin]—‘‘ƒŠà
Concerta(TM)67.9--[methylphenidate HCl]ADHDŽ¡—Öò;”­”„2000.8
Ethyol(R)48.448.332.6[amifostine];2002.10.1 Medimmune‚Ö
Elmiron(R)33.729.923.0[pentosan polysulfate sodium]ŠÔŽ¿«äNã÷‰ŠG1997.9 IVAX‚©‚ç•ĉÁ‚̔̔„Œ Žæ“¾
Mycelex(R) Troche19.5(-33)29.225.9[clotrimazole]R^‹ÛÜ;
Testoderm TTS(R) line18.620.810.0[testosterone]
Other28.242.135.9
Total ALZA Pharmaceuticals477.7323.4175.8
œALZA Technologies
Contract manufacturing129.5124.6113.6
Intersegment53.441.222.1
Total ALZA Technologies182.9165.8135.7
Intersegment eliminations(53.4)(41.2)(22.1)
Total net sales607.2448.0289.4
================================== šSEQUUS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: SEQU) 1981 Ý—§@ 1995 Liposome Technology Inc (HW)‚©‚çSEQUUS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.‚ɎЖ¼•ÏX 1995 .12 Doxil”­”„B .12 AMPHOTEC‚ÉŠÖ‚µ‚ÄSchering-Plough Corp‚ɔ̔„ƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX 1998 .10 Alza‚É‹zŽû‡•¹‚³‚ê‚éB ALZA To Acquire SEQUUS[1998.10.5] SEQUUS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ==================================
œALZA Corporation

--- http://www.alza.com/ ; œPresse Release Johnson & Johnson Announces Completion of Merger with ALZA Corporation[01.6.22] --- Alza‚ÍAJ&J‚ÌŠ®‘SŽq‰ïŽÐ‚ɂȂÁ‚½B@‰ïŽÐ‚Í‚»‚̂܂ÜB Concerta - A success story[12p; Winter 2001] --- - An Interview with Dr. Alejandro Zaffaroni, ALZA's Drug Delivery Visionary - Patterned Drug Delivery Using ALZA's OROS(R) Technology




AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc
¡AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc

 - http://www.amagpharma.com/
•nŒŒŽ¡—Öò‚¨‚æ‚ÑŠàEzŠÂŠí޾г‚Ì‘¢‰e܂̊J”­‚É“Á‰»
100 HAYDEN AVENUE. LEXINGTON, MA, 02140; www.advancedmagnetics.com

1981”NÝ—§



œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ 000)2009200820072006/10-122006/92005/9
(»•i”„ã)16,4827511,2083531,449890
(ƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒXŽû“ü)5169591,0962229071,281
(ƒƒCƒ„ƒŠƒeƒBŽû“ü)18022824844317274
”„ã‚@‡Œv17,1781,9382,5526192,6732,445
”„㌴‰¿1.013292320287273204
Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï36,27331,71624,2366,39321,29412,037
”Ì”„EŠÇ—”ï77,82949,53620,3962,1978,0113,338
(Œ´‰¿‚¨‚æ‚ÑŒo”ï)115,11581,54444,9528,87729,57815,579
Œoí—˜‰v(94,619)(71,925)(33,894)(7,440)(25,365)(12,715)
“–Šúƒ—˜‰v(93,351)(71,647)(33,894)(7,440)(25,365)(12,715)
]‹Æˆõ”[˜AŒ‹]283

Feraheme15,774-[Ferumoxytol ]
GastroMARK 708(+78)398[ferumoxsil]• •”‘¢‰e
Feridex I.V. -333[ferumoxides]ŠÌ‘Ÿ‘¢‰eÜ
‚»‚Ì‘¼»•i-20
»•i”„ã@Œv16,482(>+100)751
œFeraheme(Ferumoxytol)@“SŒ‡–R«•nŒŒ
y2009zOn June 30, 2009, Feraheme was approved for marketing in the U.S. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for use as an IV iron replacement therapy for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, or IDA, in adult patients with chronic kidney disease, or CKD. We market and sell Feraheme through our own commercial organization, consisting of approximately 120 professionals, including an 80.person specialized sales force and account management and reimbursement teams. We sell Feraheme primarily to authorized wholesalers and specialty distributors and began commercial sale of Feraheme in the U.S. in July 2009.

In November 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, assigned Feraheme two unique Q.codes, one for the treatment of IDA in end.stage renal disease patients undergoing dialysis and one for the treatment of IDA in non.end.stage renal disease patients. These Q.codes, which are temporary product.specific codes that enable automated processing of Feraheme.related claims, became effective on January 1, 2010.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized net product sales of Feraheme of $15.8 million, including approximately $1.3 million of the $11.5 million in deferred product revenues we had recorded in the third quarter of 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, shortly after the launch of Feraheme, we implemented a Launch Incentive Program under which certain dialysis organizations purchased Feraheme directly from us. This program provided certain customers with, among other things, discounted pricing and expanded rights of return. As a result, we deferred revenues associated with this program which we will recognize as revenues as the participating organizations utilize their Feraheme inventory. We expect that utilization of the remaining deferred product revenues from the Launch Incentive Program will increase going forward as each Launch Incentive Program customer has begun to use Feraheme.

In December 2009, we submitted draft protocols for two proposed clinical trials to meet our FDA post.approval Pediatric Research Equity Act requirement to support pediatric labeling of Feraheme. In 2010, we intend to initiate these two randomized, active controlled pediatric studies in children with IDA. One study will be in dialysis dependent CKD patients, and the other will be in CKD patients not on dialysis. Each study will assess the safety and efficacy of Feraheme treatment as compared to oral iron in approximately 144 children.

We also plan to advance our Feraheme clinical development program in adults by initiating two Phase III multi.center clinical trials in mid.2010 to assess Feraheme for the treatment of IDA in a broad range of patients, which may include women with abnormal uterine bleeding, or AUB, patients with cancer and gastrointestinal diseases and postpartum women, for whom oral iron is unsatisfactory. One study will assess the efficacy and safety of two doses of 510 milligrams each of Feraheme compared to placebo in a total of approximately 800 patients with IDA. A second study will assess the efficacy and safety of two doses of 510 milligrams each of Feraheme compared to a total dose of 1,000 milligrams of an IV iron sucrose product in a total of approximately 600 patients with IDA. Further, we intend to initiate an open label extension study enrolling patients from the placebo controlled study who will be followed for six months and will be eligible to receive two doses of 510 milligrams each of Feraheme whenever they meet treatment criteria.

We continue to evaluate our strategy for seeking approval for Feraheme as an IV iron replacement therapeutic agent in countries outside of the U.S.

The commercial opportunity for Feraheme as an IV iron replacement therapeutic agent varies from country to country, and in determining which additional markets outside of the U.S. we intend to enter, we are assessing factors such as potential pricing and reimbursement, the role of iron in medical treatment protocols, and the regulatory requirements of each country. We expect to file a Marketing Authorization Application, or MAA, for Feraheme for the treatment of IDA in CKD patients with the European Medicines Agency, or EMEA, in mid.2010. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we received approval from the EMEA for our Pediatric Investigation Plan, which is a prerequisite for the submission of our Feraheme MAA. Our Pediatric Investigation Plan includes the two pediatric studies required to meet our Pediatric Research Equity Act requirement and two additional pediatric studies requested by the EMEA. To further support our MAA, we have initiated a global, randomized, Phase IV multi.center, active controlled trial with approximately 150 adult CKD patients both on dialysis and not on dialysis. This study will assess the safety and efficacy of two doses of 510 milligrams each of Feraheme compared to a total dose of 1,000 milligrams of an IV iron sucrose product.

In December 2009, we filed a New Drug Submission for Feraheme to treat IDA in patients with CKD with the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada, or Health Canada, the federal authority that regulates pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices for human use in Canada. In February 2010, we received a Screening Deficiency Notice from Health Canada requesting certain clarifications and additional documents. We have submitted our response to Health Canada and believe that all of these items are readily addressable. In addition, in December 2009, our partner in China, 3SBio Inc., or 3SBio, filed an application with the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration, or the SFDA, to obtain approval to begin a registrational clinical trial necessary to file for marketing approval in China. Once approved by the SFDA, 3SBio plans to commence a multi.center randomized efficacy and safety study in China involving approximately 200 CKD patients.

In addition to its use for the treatment of IDA, Feraheme may also be useful as a vascular enhancing agent in magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI. In August 2008, the FDA granted Fast Track designation to Feraheme with respect to its development as a diagnostic agent for vascular.enhanced MRI for the assessment of peripheral arterial disease, or PAD, in patients with CKD. We have enrolled over two.thirds of our 108 patient Phase II study of Feraheme in vascular.enhanced MRI for the detection of clinically significant arterial stenosis or occlusion, or narrowing or blocking of the arteries.

y2009@“K‰žzFeraheme as an IV Iron Replacement Therapeutic

Overview

On June 30, 2009, Feraheme was approved for marketing in the U.S. by the FDA for use as an IV iron replacement therapy for the treatment of IDA in adult patients with CKD. In July 2009, we began to market and sell Feraheme in both the dialysis and non.dialysis CKD markets, including to nephrologists, hematologists, dialysis organizations, hospitals and other end.users who treat patients with CKD.

Chronic kidney disease, anemia, and iron deficiency

It has been estimated that approximately 10% to 15% of the U.S. adult population is affected by CKD, a condition generally characterized by damaged kidneys, or a reduction in kidney function below 60% of normal. Anemia, a common condition among CKD patients, is associated with cardiovascular complications, decreased quality of life, hospitalizations, and increased mortality. Anemia develops early during the course of CKD and worsens with advancing kidney disease. Iron deficiency is a common cause of anemia in CKD patients and can result from multiple blood draws, hospitalizations and interventional procedures, gastrointestinal bleeding, or poor nutritional intake. Regardless of the cause of anemia, iron replacement therapy is essential to increase iron stores and raise hemoglobin levels. Iron is also essential for effective treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents, or ESAs, which are commonly used in anemic patients to stimulate red blood cell production.

According to an estimate by the United States Renal Data System, approximately 400,000 CKD patients are projected to be on dialysis in the U.S. in 2010. Approximately 90% of these dialysis patients will receive IV iron as part of managing their anemia. In addition, data contained in a 2002 publication in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology suggests that up to 1.6 million of stage 3 and 4 non.dialysis CKD patients with anemia may be iron deficient and could therefore benefit from receiving IV iron. We believe that less than 10% of these patients are currently being treated with IV iron.

Currently there are two methods used to treat IDA in CKD patients: oral iron supplements and IV iron. Oral iron supplements are often not absorbed well by the gastrointestinal tract and frequently have side effects, such as constipation, diarrhea, and cramping, which can cause patients to stop taking their medication. In addition, it can take an extended time for hemoglobin levels to improve following the initiation of oral iron treatment. Conversely, iron given intravenously allows larger amounts of iron to be provided to patients while avoiding many of the side effects and treatment compliance issues associated with oral iron, and can result in faster rises in hemoglobin levels. The administration of IV iron has been shown to be effective in treating anemia either when used alone or in combination with an ESA. Current U.S. treatment guidelines indicate that treating first with iron alone may delay or reduce the need for ESA therapy.

For IV iron replacement therapy in patients with CKD, the total therapeutic course of iron typically used in clinical practice is 1,000 milligrams, or one gram. Rapid administration of large doses of other IV iron products has been associated with an unfavorable safety profile. As a result, other IV iron products are typically administered as a slow push or a 15 to 60 minute infusion in doses of 100 to 200 milligrams, thus requiring five to ten physician visits and repeated IV access for patients to receive a standard one gram therapeutic course, potentially resulting in considerable burden to both providers and patients. Feraheme is administered as a 510 milligram injection followed by a second 510 milligram injection three to eight days later, each of which can be administered in as fast as 17 seconds at a regular office visit or during dialysis treatment without the use of infusion equipment or prolonged medical intervention.

Feraheme in indications other than CKD

IDA is widely prevalent in many different patient populations, including women with AUB, patients with cancer and gastrointestinal diseases, and postpartum women. We believe that the product characteristics of Feraheme support clinical development in these additional indications, and we are currently in the process of preparing for a global clinical development program for Feraheme in a broad range of patients with IDA, regardless of the underlying cause. We intend to initiate our Phase III program for Feraheme in IDA in mid.2010.

Included among the patient populations we are evaluating for additional indications for Feraheme are women with AUB and cancer patients.

AUB is defined as chronic, heavy, or prolonged uterine bleeding that can result from multiple causes, including uterine abnormalities, blood disorders, pregnancy, intrauterine devices, medications, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Both iron deficiency and IDA are commonly associated with AUB. The prevalence of anemia in AUB patients has been reported to range from 10% to 67%, and the prevalence of iron deficiency in AUB patients has been reported to range from 20% to 50%, depending on patient age and diagnostic criteria. IDA in patients with AUB, regardless of the cause, requires treatment with iron supplementation, either by oral or IV administration.

Anemia is also common in patients with cancer. Depending on the type of cancer, it has been estimated that between 30% and 90% of patients with cancer have anemia. Iron supplementation through both oral and IV administration has an important role in treating anemia in cancer patients. While there may be some differences in the underlying causes of anemia and iron deficiency in cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy and those who are not, patients in both categories may develop absolute IDA due to blood loss and/or the inadequate intake or absorption of iron. Oral iron has been used to treat IDA in cancer patients, but its efficacy is variable due to inconsistent bioavailability and absorption, the high incidence of gastrointestinal side effects, potential interactions with other treatments and patient noncompliance. IV iron has been shown in small clinical trials to be well tolerated in the cancer patient population in both patients who are receiving chemotherapy and those who are not.

Ferumoxytol as a Diagnostic Agent for Vascular Enhancement in MRI

MRI is a non.invasive method used to visualize normal or abnormal anatomy or pathophysiology in patients in order to diagnose disease and injury.

Imaging agents or biomarkers play an important role in improving the quality of diagnostic images by increasing the contrast between different internal structures or types of tissues in various disease states.

Ferumoxytol is currently in development as an agent for vascular.enhanced MRI because of its ability to increase the magnetic relaxivity of blood, resulting in MRIs with enhanced vascular contrast. When used with the appropriate pulse sequence, ferumoxytol may provide high.quality diagnostic images. In addition to its superparamagnetic properties, ferumoxytol can be administered rapidly as an IV injection at a rate of up to one milliliter per second. It also has a long blood half.life of approximately 15 hours, which may permit repeated imaging of the same or different body regions. These features of ferumoxytol may make it useful as an MRI biomarker in vascular disorders.

The initial focus of our clinical development of ferumoxytol as an imaging agent has been in patients with PAD for the detection of clinically significant arterial stenosis or occlusion. PAD is a manifestation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and can occur when plaque builds up on the inside wall of the arteries that carry blood from the heart to the head, internal organs and limbs causing the arteries to narrow, which can reduce or block blood flow. Symptomatic PAD is associated with decreased quality of life, and whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, PAD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular problems, and cardiovascular mortality.

The prevalence of PAD in the U.S. is estimated to be approximately 8 million adults, affecting up to 20% of individuals 65 years of age and older. The prevalence of PAD increases with age, diabetes, CKD, hypertension and smoking, as does the presence of known atherosclerosis in other parts of the body.

In the U.S., cardiovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality, with a prevalence of approximately one in three adults. Additionally, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death, accounting for approximately 35% of all deaths in 2005.

Both the diagnosis and clinical management of PAD and cardiovascular disease often require the accurate assessment of vascular anatomy, and therefore, there is an important medical need for the availability of safe and effective techniques for invasive and/or non.invasive imaging modalities in these patient populations. High.resolution imaging, including digital subtraction angiography, contrast.enhanced computed tomography, and contrast.enhanced magnetic resonance angiography all provide the depiction of vascular anatomy required for consideration of endovascular or surgical intervention. However, there are important side effects of these techniques that seriously impact the appropriate evaluation of patients. There is a well.known risk of kidney damage associated with the administration of certain contrast agents for computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography, and X.ray angiography. Several currently approved contrast agents used for MRI in the U.S. are gadolinium.based and are associated with rare but severe adverse events in patients with CKD. In September 2007, the FDA issued a "Black Box" warning for all gadolinium.based contrast agents in certain patients due to these agents' potential association with Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis, or NSF. NSF is a condition that so far has only occurred in patients with kidney disease. NSF can pose a serious and potentially fatal risk to patients with CKD, and the FDA has sought to limit the use of currently available contrast agents in this patient population. Currently there is no effective treatment for NSF.

Ferumoxytol is an iron.based agent with unique superparamagnetic properties that may be visualized by MRI. There are no iron.based PAD contrast agents currently approved for MRI in the U.S. The FDA has granted Fast Track designation to ferumoxytol for its development as a diagnostic agent for vascular.enhanced MRI to improve the assessment of suspected PAD in patients with known or suspected CKD. The Fast Track process is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the FDA's review of products and is intended to bring valuable treatments more quickly to patients in need. We have enrolled approximately two.thirds of our 108 patient Phase II study of ferumoxytol for vascular.enhanced MRI for the detection of clinically significant arterial stenosis or occlusion.

We currently have exclusive world.wide rights to market and sell ferumoxytol as an imaging agent.

y2009 CompetitionzThe pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries are subject to intense competition and rapid technological change. We have competitors both in the U.S. and internationally, and many have greater financial and other resources and more experienced trade, sales and manufacturing organizations than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have name recognition, established positions in the market and long.standing relationships with customers and distributors. Feraheme's two primary competitors are Venofer®, which is marketed in the U.S. by Fresenius Medical Care North America, or Fresenius, and American Regent Laboratories, Inc., or American Regent, a subsidiary of Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Luitpold, and Ferrlecit®, which is marketed by Sanofi.Aventis U.S. LLC. Products developed by our competitors may be or may be perceived to be safer, more effective, and/or easier to administer or have more favorable pricing, insurance coverage, coding and reimbursement than Feraheme. In addition, further technological and product developments may make other iron replacement therapy products more competitive than Feraheme, which would adversely impact sales of Feraheme as an iron replacement therapeutic agent if such products are approved by the FDA. We may not be able to compete successfully with these companies.

We believe that our ability to successfully compete depends on a number of factors, including the timing and scope of regulatory approval of additional indications and geographies for Feraheme and of products by our competitors, our ability to obtain and maintain favorable pricing, insurance coverage, coding and reimbursement for Feraheme, our ability to implement effective marketing campaigns, the effectiveness of our sales force, our ability to maintain favorable patent protection for Feraheme, market acceptance of Feraheme and our ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of Feraheme at commercially acceptable costs.

The iron replacement therapy market is highly sensitive to several factors including, but not limited to, the perceived safety profile of the available products, the ability to obtain appropriate insurance coverage, coding and reimbursement, price competitiveness, and product characteristics such as convenience of administration and dosing regimens. To date, we have not conducted any head.to.head clinical studies comparing Feraheme to other IV iron replacement products.

There are currently two options for treating IDA in CKD patients: oral iron supplements and IV iron. The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines recommend IV iron administration for hemodialysis patients with stage 5 CKD, and either oral or IV iron for peritoneal dialysis patients and non.dialysis patients with stages 1 through 5 CKD. However, oral iron supplements are poorly absorbed by many patients, which may adversely impact their effectiveness, and are associated with certain side effects that may adversely affect patient compliance in using such products. The alternative, IV iron, is currently available in the U.S. as ferumoxytol, iron sucrose, sodium ferric gluconate, or iron dextran. The IV iron products comprised of iron sucrose or sodium ferric gluconate are typically administered as a slow push or a fifteen to sixty minute infusion in doses of 100 to 200 milligrams, thus requiring five to ten physician visits and repeated IV access for patients to receive a standard one gram therapeutic course. The iron dextran products are typically administered as a slow push in 100 milligram doses and also require five to ten physician visits to receive a standard one gram therapeutic course. Feraheme is administered as a 510 milligram injection followed by a second 510 milligram injection three to five days later, each of which can be administered in as fast as 17 seconds at a regular office visit or during dialysis treatment without the use of infusion equipment or prolonged medical intervention.

Feraheme currently competes with four IV iron products in the U.S. for the treatment of IDA in CKD patients. Its two primary competitors are Venofer®, an iron sucrose complex, and Ferrlecit®, a sodium ferric gluconate. Venofer® is currently approved for use in hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and non.dialysis dependent CKD patients. Ferrlecit® is approved for use only in hemodialysis patients. Dexferrum® is an iron dextran product marketed by American Regent, and INFeD®, also an iron dextran product, is marketed by Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Watson. Both iron dextran products are used in patients with documented iron deficiency in whom oral iron administration is unsatisfactory or impossible.

Based on sales data provided by IMS Health Incorporated, or IMS Health, we estimate that the size of the 2009 U.S. IV iron replacement therapy market was approximately 1.6 million grams, which represented an increase of approximately 8% over 2008. Of the estimated 1.6 million grams sold in the U.S. IV iron therapy replacement market in 2009, sales of Venofer® and Ferrlecit® represented approximately 67% and 21%, respectively. Dexferrum® and INFeD® together accounted for approximately 11% of sales of grams of iron in the U.S. market in 2009. Feraheme accounted for approximately 1% of sales of grams of iron in the U.S. market in 2009.

We compete primarily in two segments of the iron replacement therapy market: the dialysis market and the non.dialysis market.

The dialysis market is the largest and most established market for IV iron replacement therapies, with two companies serving a significant majority of all dialysis patients in the U.S. Fresenius, and DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, together treat more than two.thirds of the U.S. dialysis population. In September 2008, Fresenius finalized an exclusive sublicense agreement with Luitpold, the U.S. licensing partner of Vifor Pharma, a subsidiary of Galenica Ltd., or Galenica, to manufacture, sell and distribute Venofer® to independent outpatient dialysis clinics in the U.S. Luitpold retains the right to sell Venofer® in the U.S. to any other customer. In addition, Galenica, Vifor Pharma, and Fresenius entered into a strategic joint.venture, which became effective on January 1, 2009, to market and distribute Venofer® and Ferinject® in the dialysis market in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Fresenius has significant experience selling and distributing dialysis equipment and supplies to outpatient dialysis clinics and, as a result of these agreements, it may be more difficult for us to penetrate the dialysis market, in particular at their clinics.

We believe there is a significant opportunity for Feraheme in the treatment of IDA in CKD patients not yet on dialysis. The non.dialysis IV iron market is comprised primarily of three segments: hospitals, hematology clinics and nephrology clinics. The only primary competitor currently approved for use in non.dialysis dependent CKD patients is Venofer®. Our ability to effectively compete with Venofer® in the non.dialysis CKD market depends in part upon our ability to gain formulary access in hospitals and effectively promote Feraheme to physicians who treat non.dialysis CKD patients.

In December 2009, Pharmacosmos A/S, or Pharmacosmos, received a positive recommendation in 22 European countries and a final marketing authorization in Denmark, Iceland and the Netherlands to market Monofer® (iron isomaltoside 1000), its injectable iron preparation for the treatment of IDA. During 2008, Pharmacosmos completed two Phase III non.comparative open.label studies of IV iron oligosaccharide in CKD patients as well as in congestive heart failure patients. Pharmacosmos is currently recruiting patients for a Phase III comparative open.label study of IV iron oligosaccharide in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and IDA. It is too early to determine whether Monofer® will gain any meaningful share of the IV iron market in any country in which it has been approved.

In addition to the foregoing currently marketed products, there are several iron replacement therapy products in various stages of clinical and commercial development in the U.S. and abroad,

including Injectafer®, which is known as Ferinject® in Europe, and soluble ferric pyrophosphate, a form of iron given as part of the hemodialysis procedure.

Galenica, through its subsidiary Vifor (International) Inc., or Vifor, exclusively licenses Injectafer® to Luitpold and American Regent for marketing and sale in the U.S. and Canada. Injectafer® is in development for a variety of anemia.related indications, including the treatment of IDA in CKD patients, whether or not on dialysis. In March 2008, Luitpold received a non.approvable letter from the FDA for Injectafer® for the treatment of IDA in postpartum women and women with heavy uterine bleeding in the U.S. Luitpold initiated five clinical trials during 2008 and 2009 in an effort to provide additional data to address the concerns of the FDA. In June 2007, the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency approved the registration of Ferinject®, and it was simultaneously registered in a total of 18 EU countries. Ferinject® is currently marketed in at least 12 European countries. In November 2009, Vifor completed a Phase III study of patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency. In addition, Vifor is sponsoring ongoing Phase III trials for Ferinject® for the treatment of anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and has stated that it is planning to initiate a Phase IIIb study to evaluate the long.term efficacy of Ferinject® in non.dialysis dependent CKD patients with IDA.

Rockwell Medical, or Rockwell, is developing an iron supplemented dialysate product, a form of iron given as part of the hemodialysis procedure, to be used as a treatment for IDA in dialysis patients. Rockwell has completed a Phase IIb clinical trial and has stated that it intends to initiate Phase III trials in the second half of 2010. We do not know when this product might be submitted to the FDA for approval or marketed. If shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of IDA, this product could compete with Feraheme in the dialysis market segment.

In addition to competition from other marketed products and products known by us to be currently under development, the market opportunity for Feraheme could be negatively affected if generic IV iron replacement therapy products were to be approved and achieve commercial success. For example, in July 2009, Watson announced that it entered into a license agreement with GeneraMedix, Inc., or GeneraMedix, for the exclusive U.S. marketing rights to a generic version of Ferrlecit®, which is indicated for the treatment of IDA in hemodialysis patients receiving supplemental ESA therapy. GeneraMedix has filed an Abbreviated NDA with the FDA, which is under expedited review. Companies that manufacture generic products typically invest far less resources in research and development than the manufacturer of a branded product and can therefore price their products significantly lower than those already on the market. It remains unclear if and when a generic product will enter this market. If any of these product candidates are approved for marketing and sale by the FDA, our efforts to market and sell Feraheme and our ability to generate additional revenues and achieve profitability could be adversely affected.


œGastroMARK
y2009zGastroMARK, our oral contrast agent used for delineating the bowel in MRI, is approved and marketed in the U.S., Europe, and other countries through our marketing partners. Sales of GastroMARK by our marketing partners have been at their current levels for the last several years, and we do not expect sales of GastroMARK to change materially.

GastroMARK was approved by the FDA in 1996. Our marketing partner, Covidien, Ltd., or Covidien, or its predecessors, have been marketing GastroMARK in the U.S. since 1997. We initially licensed the marketing rights to GastroMARK on an exclusive basis to Guerbet S.A., or Guerbet, in western Europe and Brazil. Guerbet has been marketing GastroMARK in several EU countries since 1993 under the tradename Lumirem® and subsequently acquired the rights to market GastroMARK in several other countries in South America, the Middle East, southeast Asia, Africa, and eastern Europe. See "Licensing, Marketing and Supply Arrangements."


œ
yz

œAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc

œProducts Feraheme® (ferumoxytol) GastroMARK® (ferumoxsil) ¡Investors œSEC Filings 10-K Annual report[2010.2.26] - [pdf,151p] - [doc] - [xls] œFinancial Report šAnnual Report 2009 Annual Report œPress Releases

AMAG Pharmaceuticals and Takeda Announce Acceptance of Submission of Feraheme(R) Marketing Authorization Application to the European Medicines Agency[2010.6.29]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals to Host Conference Call to Discuss Strategic Collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company for Feraheme(R) in Select Ex-US Territories[2010.4.1]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Announce Strategic Collaboration for Feraheme(R) in All Therapeutic Indications in Select Ex-US Territories, Including Europe[2010.4.1]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals Provides Feraheme(R) Safety Update[2010.2.5]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Announces Data Presentations at the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Renal Week Meeting[2009.10.7]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals Announces U.S. Launch of Feraheme(TM) (ferumoxytol) Injection[2009.7.13]
FDA Approves Feraheme(TM) to Treat Iron Deficiency Anemia in Adult Chronic Kidney Disease Patients[2009.6.30]
FDA Decision on Feraheme NDA Expected Within Next Few Days[2009.6.29]
AMAG Pharmaceuticals Announces New PDUFA Date for Feraheme(TM) (ferumoxytol injection)[2009.5.12]





¡Amersham Plc

 -http://www.amersham.com/index.html; –{ŽÐ|‰p‘Gˆã—pf’f‹@ŠíAƒ‰ƒCƒtƒTƒCƒGƒ“ƒX
•ª–ì‚Ì¢ŠEŠé‹ÆB@]‹Æˆõ10,000ˆÈãA”NŠÔ”„ã(2002)@’1.62 billion ($2.54 billion)B
@¢ŠE30‚©‘‚ÉŒ¤‹†E»‘¢Ž{ÝA50‚©‘‚ɔ̔„Ž{Ý‚ð‚à‚ÂB

  š2003.10.10‚ÉGE‚É‚æ‚锃Žû‚ªs‚í‚êA2004.4.8‚ÉŠ®—¹B(Ú×)
@GE Healthcare -http://www.gehealthcare.com/



šAmersham plc‚ð‚Q‚‚̎–‹Æ‚Å‘gD‚³‚ê‚éB
  Amersham Health (medical diagnostics and therapy products)‚¨‚æ‚Ñ
  Amersham Biosciences (ƒoƒCƒIGdiscovery systems and protein separations).
š—ðŽj
@Amersham plc‚ÍA1997”N‚ÉAmersham International (UK), Pharmacia Biotech (Swede
n) and Nycomed (Norway)‚Ì‚RŽÐ‡•¹‚É‚æ‚è’a¶B
@’) Pharmacia Biotech(1967-1997): ‚»‚êˆÈ‘O‚ÍPharmacia
      Amersham International()@;“–‰‰p­•{oŽ‘The Radiochemical Centre‚Æ‚µ‚Ä
      @25”NŠÔA1982”NŽ„Šé‹Æ‰»Amersham

EThe Radiochemical Centre; Amersham International; Nycomed Amersham; Amersham plc
ENycomed; Nycomed Amersham Imaging; Amersham Health  
EPharmacia; Pharmacia Biotech; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Amersham Biosciences



¡”„ã
(’PˆÊ’)          2003     2002     2001
œAmersham Health  973(+7)  948(+8%)  922(+13)
šˆã—×pf’f–ò     924(+9)  886 
¦‘¢‰eÜ
Omnipaque          218(+2)  222(+6%) (iohexol) ”ñƒCƒIƒ“Xü/CTzŠÂŠíE_ŒoEŽîá‡[“Á‹–off]
Visipaque          122(+38)  91(+18) (iodixanol) ”ñƒCƒIƒ“Xü/CTzŠÂŠíŒn [“Á‹–2008-2011]
Omniscan           106(+12)  96(+17) (gadodiamide) MRI’†•_ŒoEzŠÂŠí [2007-2009]
Optison                    (human albumin microspheres containing perflutren)
                           S‹Ø[2012-2013]
¦•úŽË«ˆã–ò•i
Myoview            149(+20) 133(+26) (99mTc-tetrafosmin kit) SŒŒ—¬E“ûŠà[2009-2010]
šŽ¡—Ã–ò            49(-17)  62

œAmersham Biosci  679      670(+6%)  681(+12)
’`”’•ª—£           295(+5)  276 
’TõƒVƒXƒeƒ€       384(-2)  394 

‘S”„ã 1652(+6) 1618 ¡’nˆæ•Ê”„ã (’PˆÊ’) 2002 2002 2001 ]‹Æˆõ” –k•Ä 807 799(+8) 2,900 ‰¢B 462 428(+8) 6,200 “ú–{ 247 264(+1) 250 ƒAƒWƒA‘¾•½—m 95 80 ‚»‚Ì‘¼ 41 47 700
‘S”„ã 1652(+6) 1618 ¡Market Report: Medical Diagnostics/Radiotherapy[Amersham AnnualReport 2002] ¦•Ä‘ŽsêƒVƒFƒA Amersham 38%, Bracco 18%, Tyco Healthcare(Mallinckrodt Imaging) 14%, Schering 12%, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS) Medical Imaging(formerly Dupont) 12%, Guerbet 2%, ‚»‚Ì‘¼ 4% ¦f’f‹@Ší X-ray/CT MRI •úŽË«f’f–ò ’´‰¹”gf’f Total scans 630m 40m 140m Enhanced scans 75m 10m 28m 0.5m Žsê‹K–Í ’1.4bn ’320m ’1.1bn ’10m (1.5–œ‘äã) (1.5–œ‘äã) (15–œ‘äã) GammaCamera
œAmersham Plc

-http://www.amersham.com/index.html œInvestors Annual reports Financial archives œNews & Events Preliminary Results for the 12 months ended 31 December 2003[2004.2.17] 1999/1-ˆÈ~‚ªWEBŒŸõ‰Â œŠJ”­•i–Ú @Annual Report 2002‚É‹LÚ‚ª‚È‚­ Preliminary Results for the 12 Months ended 31 December 2002[2003.2.26]ŽQÆB œFastFact 2003 - ŒÂ•Ê»•i”„‚èã‚°A»•iƒV[ƒg‚È‚Ç ¡“ú–{ @Amersham KK‚Æ‚µ‚Ä“ú–{ŽxŽÐ‚ ‚èB @“ú–{ƒƒfƒBƒtƒBƒWƒbƒNƒXA‘æˆê»–ò‚Ƃ̌_–ñ‚ ‚èB
œAmersham Health

(‹Œ Nycomed Amersham Imaging) œProduct Information —vID --•Ä‘ˆÈŠO œAmersham Health-US šProduct Catalog
œƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€ ƒoƒCƒIƒTƒGƒCƒ“ƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ

@Ý—§1998”N4ŒŽA]‹Æˆõ” –ñ240–¼A”„ã‚ –ñ180‰­‰~(2003”N) Ž–‹Æ“à—e ƒoƒCƒIƒeƒNƒmƒƒW[ŠÖ˜A‹@Ší‚¨‚æ‚ÑŽŽ–ò‚Ì—Ao“ü”Ì”„ Žå—Í»•i ‰t‘̃Nƒƒ}ƒgƒOƒ‰ƒtƒB[‘•’uAƒQƒ‹’R‘ÌADNAƒV[ƒNƒGƒ“ƒT[Aƒ}ƒCƒNƒƒAƒŒƒCA ƒ‰ƒWƒIƒAƒCƒ\ƒg[ƒv•Wޝ‰»‡•¨‚È‚Ç (—ª—ð) @1973”N ƒXƒEƒF[ƒfƒ“‘ Pharmacia AB “ú–{–@lÝ—§ @1981”N ‰p‘ Amerham International plc “ú–{–@lÝ—§ @1998”N 4ŒŽ ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐ ‚ƃtƒ@ƒ‹ƒ}ƒVƒA ƒoƒCƒIƒeƒNДޮ‰ïŽÐ‚ª‡•¹ @@@@@@@ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€ ƒtƒ@ƒ‹ƒ}ƒVƒA ƒoƒCƒIƒeƒNДޮ‰ïŽÐÝ—§ @2002”N 1ŒŽ@ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€ ƒoƒCƒIƒTƒCƒGƒ“ƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ‚֎Ж¼•ÏX from ‰ïŽÐŠT—v œ»•i œƒeƒNƒmƒƒW[ œƒvƒŒƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX
œ“ú–{ƒƒWƒtƒBƒWƒbƒNƒXДޮ‰ïŽÐ

- http://www.nmp.co.jp/ - [Ý—§]1973”N3ŒŽ20“ú [oŽ‘”ä—¦] Z—F‰»ŠwH‹ÆŠ”Ž®‰ïŽÐ@50%/ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€ƒOƒ‹[ƒv@50% Ž–‹Æ–Ú“I •úŽË«ˆã–ò•iAf’f—p–òAˆã—×p‹ï‚¨‚æ‚ÑŠÖ˜A»•i‚ÌŒ¤‹†AŠJ”­A»‘¢A”Ì”„‚È‚ç‚тɗAo“ü @[‰ˆŠv] 1973”N 3ŒŽ •Ä‘ƒƒWƒtƒBƒWƒbƒNƒXiMPIjAZ—F‰»ŠwH‹ÆŠ”Ž®‰ïŽÐAZ—F¤Ž–Дޮ‰ïŽÐ‚̇•Ù‰ïŽÐ‚Æ‚µ‚ÄÝ—§ 1975”N 3ŒŽ MPI‚É‘ã‚í‚èA“ú–{ƒƒVƒ…Дޮ‰ïŽÐ‚ªŠ”Žå‚ɂȂé 1994”N 3ŒŽ “ú–{ƒƒVƒ…Дޮ‰ïŽÐ‚ªŠ”Žå‚æ‚è“P‘Þ 12ŒŽ ‰p‘ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€EƒCƒ“ƒ^[ƒiƒVƒ‡ƒiƒ‹‚ªŠ”Žå‚ƂȂé 1996”N 9ŒŽ ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐ‚̃wƒ‹ƒXƒPƒAŽ–‹Æ•”–傯“‡ 10ŒŽ Z—F‰»ŠwH‹ÆŠ”Ž®‰ïŽÐ‚ƃAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€EƒCƒ“ƒ^[ƒiƒVƒ‡ƒiƒ‹‚ÌÜ”¼oŽ‘‘̧‚ƂȂé 1997”N10ŒŽ ‰p‘ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€EƒCƒ“ƒ^[ƒiƒVƒ‡ƒiƒ‹‚̃wƒ‹ƒXƒPƒA•”–傯ƒjƒRƒƒbƒhiƒmƒ‹ ƒEƒF[j‚Ƃ̇•¹‚É”º‚¢AV‰ïŽÐƒjƒRƒƒbƒhEƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€iŒ»ƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€j‚ªŠ”Žå‚ƂȂé 2000”N 3ŒŽ NMPƒrƒWƒlƒXƒTƒ|[ƒgДޮ‰ïŽÐÝ—§ 2001”N 4ŒŽ Z—F»–òДޮ‰ïŽÐ‚Æ‚»‚ꂼ‚ê‚̑̊Of’f–òŽ–‹Æ‚𕪗£E“‡‚µÝ—§‚µ‚½Z—F »–òƒoƒCƒIƒƒfƒBƒJƒ‹Š”Ž®‰ïŽÐ‰c‹ÆŠJŽn 2004”N 4ŒŽ ƒ[ƒlƒ‰ƒ‹ƒGƒŒƒNƒgƒŠƒbƒNiGEjƒOƒ‹[ƒv‚É‚æ‚éƒAƒ}ƒVƒƒƒ€”ƒŽû‚ª¬—§ œŠjˆãŠwf’f œˆã—Ê֌WŽÒ‚̃y[ƒW @`•úŽË«ˆã–ò•iE»•iˆê——A“Y•t•¶‘î•ñ œƒjƒ…[ƒXƒŠƒŠ[ƒX




¡Amgen

@Ý—§1980B@–{ŽÐ‚͕đDelaware

@2002.7.15 Immunex‚ð‹zŽûB“¯ŽÐPress Release‚ÍAImmunex Press Release Archives‚Æ‚µ‚ĕʈµ‚¢
@2004.3.29 Tularik‚ð‹zŽû($1.3 Billion)B“¯ŽÐPress Release‚ÍATularik Press Release Archives
	(Tularik‚Í‚T•i–Ú‚ÌCandidateAŠÌ‘ŸŠà–òT67,Á‰»ŠíŠà–òT607,R‰ŠÇÜT487,“œ”A•a–òT131,R”ì–ž–òT71‚ðŠJ”­)
@2005.12.14 Abgenix Inc.‚ð‹zŽûB“¯ŽÐPress Release‚ÍAAbgenix Press Release Archives
		“¯ŽÐ‚ÍŠù”­”„•i‚͂Ȃ­A‘å’°ŠàŽ¡—Öòpanitumumab‚ðŠJ”­’†B
		Abgenix Inc 2005”NŒˆŽZ





œ‰ïŽÐŒˆŽZ
($ milllion)2009200820072006200520042003200220012000
”„ã‚14,64215,00314,77114,26812,43010,5508,3565,5234,0163,629
‚¤‚¿»•i”„ã14,35114,68714,31113,85812,0229,977(+27)7,868(+58)4,9913,5113,202
@@‘¼‚ÌŽû“ü291316460410408573488532505427

Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­”ï2,8643,0303,2663,3662,3142,0281,6551,117865845
ƒ—˜‰v4,6054,065
‹Œ4,196
3,078
‹Œ3,166
2,809
‹Œ2,950
3,633
‹Œ3,674
2,3632,259-1,3921,1201,139
]‹Æˆõ”17,20016,90017,50020,10016,50014,40012,90010,1007,7007,300
@‚¤‚¿Œ¤‹†ŠJ”­7,8507,0008,2006,5005,6004,7003,4003,8003,800
@‚¤‚¿”Ì”„3,0502,9503,2003,0002,7002,6002,2001,8001,500
@‚¤‚¿»‘¢3,6005,6006,6005,1004,4003,6002,5002,1002,000
@‚¤‚¿‚»‚Ì‘¼2,4001,9502,1001,9001,7002,0002,000
œ»•i”„ã‚
($ milllion)20092008200720062005200420032002200120001999199819971996
EPOGEN [•Ä‘“à]2,569(+5)2,456(-1)2,489(-1)2,5112,455(-6)2601(+7)2434.72260.62108.51962.91759.11382.01160.71071.9epoetin alfa/•nŒŒÇ
Aranesp2,652(-15)3,137(-13)3,614(-12)4,121(+26)3,273(+32)2473(+60)1543.8415.641.5darbepoetin alfa/•nŒŒÇ
@•Ä‘“à1,251(-24)1,651(-23)2,154(-23)2,7902,104(+37)1533(+56)979.9284.7
@‘ŠO1,401(-6)1,486(+2)1,460(+10)1,3311,169(+24)940(+67)563.9130.9
Neulasta/NEUPOGEN4,643(+0)4,659(+9)4,277(+9)3,923(+12)3,504[]/D’†‹…Œ¸­Ç
Neulasta3,3553,3182,8802,7102,28817401255.0463.5(2002.2nd”­”„)pegfilgrastim/D’†‹…Œ¸­Ç
@•Ä‘“à2,527(+1)2,505(+7)2,231(+6)2,217(+17)1,900(+29)14761175.7463.5
@‘ŠO828(+2)813(+25)649(+32)493(+27)388(+47)264(+230)79.3-
NEUPOGEN1,2881,3411,2771,2131,2161175126713801223.71256.61116.61055.71016.3-filgrastim/D’†‹…Œ¸­Ç
@•Ä‘“à901(+1)896(+4)861(+4)830(+3)805(+3)778(-12)880.51041.7
@‘ŠO387(-13)445(+7)416(+9)383(-7)411(+4)397(+3)386.2337.9
Enbrel3,493(-3)3,598(+11)3,230(+12)2,879(+12)2.573(+35)1900(+46)1300362.1[‘SŠúŠ·ŽZ802]etanercept/ƒŠƒEƒ}ƒ`«ŠÖ߉Š
@•Ä‘“à3,283(-3)3,389(+11)3,052(+12)2,736(+11)2,470(+35)1827(+46)1253.7346.2
@‘ŠO[‰Á]210(+0)209(+17)178(+24)143(+39)103(+41)73(+59)46.315.9
Sensipar651(+9)597(+29)463(+44)321(+104)157(+324)37[cinacalcet HCl]t•s‘S‚É”º‚¤•›bó‘B‹@”\˜´iÇ‚¨‚æ‚Ñ•›bó‘BŠàгŽÒ‚Ìhypercalcemia
@•Ä‘“à429412333238122[]
@‘ŠO2221851308335[]
Vectibix ‘“à-170(+336)39(-)--[panitumumab]”­”„2006Q4;‘å’°Šà
‚»‚Ì‘¼»•i343(+43)240(+1)68(+6)64(+7)60(+18)51
‹Œ88
68.0109.8
@•Ä‘“à17515120336366439.4100.0
@‘ŠO168893528242428.69.8
Kineret------68.0109.812.0---------------01.11”­”„(anakinra)/ƒŠƒEƒ}ƒ`«ŠÖ߉РRƒŠƒEƒ}ƒ`Ü;IL-1ƒŒƒZƒvƒ^[hR–ò
@•Ä‘“à------39.4100.0
@‘ŠO------28.69.8
INFERGEN---[2001.6 Intermune‚É•ÄE‰Á‚Ì“Æèƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX]-14.526.216----(Interferon alfacon-1)
Total Product Sales14,351(-2)14,687(+3)14,311(+3)13,858(+15)12,022(+20)9977(+27)7868.2(+58)4991.23511.03202.23042.82514.42219.82088.2
@•Ä‘“à11,135(-3)11,460(+0)11,443(+0)11,397(+15)9,892(+19)8279(+22)6763.94496.7
@‘ŠO3,216(+0)3,227(+13)2,868(+17)2,461(+16)2,130(+25)1,698(+54)1104.3494.5
[]
*Immunex‚ð2002.7”ƒŽûBEnbrel‚Í2002–––˜‚É‚W–œl‚ÌŠ³ŽÒ‚ÉŽg—pBWyeth‚Í–k•ĂŔ̔„ƒp[ƒgƒi[ *INFERGEN(Interferon alfacon-1) 1996”NŽR”V“à»–ò(Œ»ƒAƒXƒeƒ‰ƒX»–ò)‚É“ú–{‚Å‚Ì ‹¤“¯ŠJ”­E”Ì”„ƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“ƒX

œ
y2009z

œNplate(R) (romiplostim) @ITP
Romiplostim (Nplate(R)) is a peptibody agonist of the thrombopoietin (gTPOh) receptor.

Nplate(R) is the first FDA-approved agent that acts directly to increase platelet production for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in splenectomized (spleen removed) and non-splenectomized adults with chronic ITP, who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins or splenectomy.

In August 2008, Nplate(R) became the first FDA-approved peptibody protein, which works by raising and sustaining platelet counts representing a novel approach for the treatment of this chronic disease.

We are also evaluating romiplostim in pediatric ITP, myelodysplastic syndromes (gMDSh), and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (gCITh). Phase 2 studies in each setting were initiated in 2006. The trials are currently ongoing and we continue to evaluate the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in these settings.

On August 22, 2008, the FDA approved Nplate(R), the first platelet producer for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in splenectomized (spleen removed) and non-splenectomized adults with chronic ITP. Nplate(R), the first FDA approved peptibody protein, works by raising and sustaining platelet counts. On February 6, 2009, we announced that the European Commission granted marketing authorization for Nplate(R) for the treatment of splenectomized adult chronic ITP patients who are refractory to other treatments (e.g. corticosteroids, immunoglobulins). In the EU, Nplate(R) may also be considered as second line treatment for adult non-splenectomized ITP patients where surgery is contra-indicated.

y2008zOn August 22, 2008, the FDA approved Nplate(R), the first platelet producer for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in splenectomized (spleen removed) and non-splenectomized adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (gITPh). Nplate(R), the first FDA approved peptibody protein, works by raising and sustaining platelet counts. As part of the approval for Nplate(R), a REMS was developed with the FDA to assure the safe use of Nplate(R) while minimizing risk. The Nplate(R) REMS involves, among other things, healthcare provider and patient enrollment registries, tracking of patient medical history and data and follow-up safety questionnaires to healthcare providers, all of which require extensive discussion with and education of healthcare providers. In addition, on February 6, 2009, we announced that the European Commission granted marketing authorization for Nplate(R) for the treatment of splenectomized adult chronic ITP patients who are refractory to other treatments (e.g. corticosteroids, immunoglobulins). In the European Union (gEUh), Nplate(R) may also be considered as second line treatment for adult non-splenectomized ITP patients where surgery is contra-indicated.

œVectibix(R) (panitumumab) @‘å’°Šà
Vectibix(R) is our trademark for our first entirely human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of patients with EGFr expressing mCRC after disease progression on, or following fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan- containing chemotherapy regimens. EGFr is a protein that plays an important role in cancer cell signaling and is over-expressed in many human cancers. Vectibix(R) is an entirely human monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to EGFrs and interferes with signals that might otherwise stimulate growth and survival of the cancer cell. The goal of developing entirely human monoclonal antibodies is to offer effective targeted therapies with lessened risk of immune response against these agents. Vectibix(R) received FDA approval in September 2006. On December 5, 2007, the European Commission granted a conditional marketing authorization for Vectibix(R), which was renewed in December 2008, as a monotherapy for the treatment of patients with EGFr expressing mCRC with non-mutated (wild-type) KRAS genes after failure of standard chemotherapy regimens. We acquired full ownership of Vectibix(R) as part of our acquisition of Abgenix, Inc. (gAbgenixh) in April 2006.
y2009z
y2008zAt the ODAC meeting on December 16, 2008, we discussed the clinical utility of the KRAS gene as a predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (gmCRCh) treated with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors (gEGFrh) antibody, Vectibix(R). We believe that data shared with the ODAC supports the suggestion that KRAS is a predictive biomarker for the anti-EGFr class of drugs in the monotherapy setting. In March 2008, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published results from an analysis of the first randomized, controlled clinical trial (gStudy 408h), which showed that mCRC patients with mutated KRAS tumors do not respond to Vectibix(R) monotherapy. Conversely, patients with wild-type KRAS tumors treated with Vectibix(R) have a better response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (gPFSh).

œDenosumab@œ‘eé Ç
y2009z€kÎ We received Complete Response Letters from the FDA on our biologics license application ("BLA") for Prolia in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis ("PMO") in women and bone loss in patients undergoing hormone ablation therapy ("HALT") for either prostate or breast cancer. These Complete Response Letters requested additional information to support approval of the treatment of the PMO indication and the HALT indication, and requested a new clinical program to support approval of the prevention of the PMO indication. (The FDA has provisionally approved the trade name Prolia in the indications noted above, for which the drug is administered twice yearly subcutaneously at a 60 milligram ("mg") dose. The trade name is only for these indications and may not apply for other indications of denosumab.)

€kÎ On February 19, 2010, we announced that the FDA has evaluated the content of our Complete Response submission for Prolia in the treatment of PMO, which we submitted on January 25, 2010, and classified it as a Class 2 resubmission. With the Class 2 designation, the FDA set a corresponding Prescription Drug User Fee Act ("PDUFA") action date of July 25, 2010.

€kÎ We received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use ("CHMP") of the European Medicines Agency ("EMA") (formerly known as the EMEA) for marketing authorization for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at increased risk of fractures and bone loss associated with hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer at increased risk of fractures.

€kÎ We announced positive results from the following three phase 3 head-to-head trials evaluating denosumab versus Zometa€@î (zoledronic acid) in the treatment of bone metastases:
@¦in patients with advanced breast cancer, in which denosumab was superior to Zometa€@î in delaying the time to the first skeletal-related event ("SRE") and delaying the time to the first-and-subsequent SREs,
@¦in advanced cancer patients with solid tumors or multiple myeloma, in which denosumab was non-inferior to Zometa€@î in delaying the time to the first SRE,
@¦in men with advanced prostate cancer, in which denosumab was superior to Zometa€@î in delaying the time to the first SRE and delaying the time to the first-and-subsequent SREs.

These three studies will form the basis of the clinical evidence package for denosumab in advanced cancer, which will be submitted to regulatory authorities later in 2010.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically targets a ligand known as RANKL (that binds to a receptor known as RANK) which is an essential regulator of osteoclasts. Denosumab is under regulatory review and is being studied across a range of conditions, including osteoporosis, treatment-induced bone loss, bone metastases, multiple myeloma and RA.

The following is a summary of certain key developments that occurred in 2009 and early 2010 with respect to denosumab:
Prolia (denosumab) for the Prevention and Treatment of PMO and the Prevention and Treatment of Bone Loss in Patients Undergoing HALT for either Prostate Cancer or Breast Cancer

In late 2008, we submitted the BLA to the FDA for Prolia in the treatment and prevention of PMO in women and bone loss in patients undergoing HALT for either prostate or breast cancer.

On August 13, 2009, we announced the results of our meeting with the FDA's Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs ("ACRHD") to review the potential use of Prolia for the treatment and prevention of PMO in women and the treatment and prevention of bone loss in patients undergoing HALT for either prostate cancer or breast cancer. The Committee recommended approval of Prolia for the treatment of PMO and for the treatment of bone loss in patients undergoing HALT for prostate cancer. The Committee recommended against approval of Prolia to treat or prevent bone loss in women with breast cancer undergoing HALT until additional data are available. The Committee also recommended against approval of Prolia to prevent bone loss in low-risk patients in all three populations. Finally, the Committee recommended that Prolia have a REMS. The ACRHD is an advisory committee of external experts who advise the FDA about the safety and effectiveness of marketed and investigational human drugs for use in the practice of obstetrics, gynecology and related specialties. This committee is advisory only and FDA officials are not bound to or limited by their recommendations.

In October 2009, the FDA issued Complete Response Letters for our BLA for Prolia for the above-noted indications. The FDA issues Complete Response Letters to request additional information needed to complete the review of applications for product approval.

The Complete Response Letter related to the Prolia application for the treatment and prevention of PMO in women requested several items, including further information on the design and background adverse event rates that will inform the methodology of our previously submitted post-marketing surveillance program, although the letter did not require additional pre-marketing clinical trials to complete the review of the treatment indication. The FDA has also requested a new clinical program to support approval of Prolia for the prevention of PMO indication. In addition, the FDA has determined that a REMS is necessary for Prolia and must include a medication guide and a healthcare provider communication plan. The FDA acknowledged receipt of our previously submitted proposed REMS materials. The FDA also requested all updated safety data related to Prolia. On February 19, 2010, we announced that the FDA has evaluated the content of our Complete Response submission for Prolia in the treatment of PMO, which we submitted on January 25, 2010, and classified it as a Class 2 resubmission. With the Class 2 designation, the FDA set a corresponding PDUFA action date of July 25, 2010.

The Complete Response Letter related to the Prolia HALT application requested additional information regarding the safety of Prolia in patients with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy and patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy ("ADT"). Specifically, the FDA has requested results from additional adequate and well-controlled clinical trials demonstrating that Prolia has no detrimental effects on either time-to-disease progression or OS. We continue to work with the FDA to determine the appropriate next steps regarding our application for the HALT indication.

Prolia Received Positive Opinion from CHMP in the EU

In December 2009, the CHMP announced a positive opinion for the marketing authorization of Prolia for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at increased risk of fractures, and for the treatment of bone loss associated with hormone ablation in men with prostate cancer at increased risk of fractures. If approved by the European Commission, we would receive marketing authorization for Prolia in all EU Member States. The timing of actual launch dates would vary by country based on reimbursement authority approval of pricing which could follow the EMA approval by many months. While the European Commission generally follows the CHMP's opinion, it is not bound to do so.

Prolia is also under regulatory review in Switzerland, Australia and Canada for the treatment and prevention of PMO and the treatment of bone loss in patients undergoing HALT for breast and prostate cancer. We are working closely with regulatory agencies in each of these countries.

Denosumab Phase 3 Bone Metastases Clinical Trials

In 2009, we announced that the phase 3 head-to-head trial evaluating denosumab versus Zometa€@î in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority in time to first SRE and its secondary endpoints (superiority compared to Zometa€@î for both delaying the time to the first on-study SRE and delaying the time to the first-and-subsequent SREs). We also announced that the phase 3 head-to-head trial evaluating denosumab versus Zometa€@î in the treatment of bone metastases in advanced cancer patients with solid tumors (not including breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority in time to first SRE. On February 8, 2010, we announced that the phase 3 head-tohead trial evaluating denosumab versus Zometa€@î in the treatment of bone metastases in advanced cancer patients with prostate cancer met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority in time to first SRE and its secondary endpoints (superiority compared to Zometa€@î for both delaying the time to the first on-study SRE and delaying the time to the first-and-subsequent SREs). These three studies will form the basis of the clinical evidence package for denosumab in advanced cancer, which will be submitted to regulatory authorities later in 2010. For more information, see "Research and Development and Selected Product Candidates."

Patents and Competition

Our outstanding material patents for denosumab are described in the table below.

TerritoryGeneral Subject MatterExpiration(1)
U.S.RANKL antibodies12/22/2017
U.S.Methods of treatment11/11/2018
U.S.RANKL antibodies11/28/2023
EuropeRANKL antibodies12/22/2017
EuropeMethods of treatment4/15/2018
EuropeRANKL antibodies2/23/2021

(1) The expiration dates may be subject to change if delays in regulatory approval lead to extensions of patent terms in the United States and/or supplemental protection in Europe.

The following table and discussion reflect other companies and their currently marketed products that will compete with denosumab, if approved. This table and discussion of competitor marketed products and potential competitor products may not be exhaustive. Merck's patent covering the use of FOSAMAX€@î to treat bone loss expired in the United States in February 2008. Following the patent expiry, generic alendronate ("ALN") became available from Teva and other companies, which competes with FOSAMAX€@î .

Therapeutic AreaCompetitor Marketed ProductPotential Competitor
PMOFOSAMAX€@îMerck
PMOActonel€@îWarner Chilcott/Aventis
PMOBoniva€@î /Bonviva€@îRoche/GSK
PMOEvista€@îEli Lilly
PMOForteo€@î /ForsteoEli Lilly
PMOMiacalcin€@îNovartis AG ("Novartis")
PMOAclasta€@î /Reclast€@îNovartis
PMOConbriza€@îPfizer
PMOFablyn€@îPfizer
OncologyZometa€@îNovartis
OncologyAredia€@îNovartis

y2008zDenosumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody in late stage clinical development that specifically targets a ligand known as RANKL (that binds to a receptor known as RANK), an essential regulator of osteoclasts (the cells that break down bone). Denosumab is being investigated for its potential to inhibit all stages of osteoclast activity through a targeted mechanism. In December 2008, we submitted a biologics license application (gBLAh) to the FDA for denosumab for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis (gPMOh) in women and bone loss in patients undergoing hormone ablation for either prostate or breast cancer. On February 18, 2009, the FDA accepted our BLA and informed us that it will target an FDA action within ten months of the BLAfs submission date, resulting in a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (gPDUFAh) action date of October 19, 2009. The FDA indicated that it intends to simultaneously review the data we submitted for both the PMO and bone loss in patients undergoing hormone ablation for prostate or breast cancer indications due to the interdependency of the data across the indications from more than 11,000 patients included in support of the BLA. Additionally, in January 2009, we submitted an application to the EMEA for the approval of denosumab for treatment of PMO in women and treatment of bone loss associated with hormone ablation therapy in patients with breast and prostate cancer. In addition, during 2008, we announced results of the following key trials involving denosumab.

Osteoporosis

On September 16, 2008 at the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (gASBMRh) annual meeting, we presented detailed results from the pivotal fracture trial (gStudy 216h) evaluating denosumab in the treatment of PMO. In this pivotal, three-year, international, phase 3 study of approximately 7,800 women with osteoporosis, patients were randomized to receive either denosumab, given by subcutaneous injection once every six months, or placebo injections. For the primary endpoint, treatment with denosumab resulted in a statistically significant reduction (68%) in the incidence of new vertebral fractures compared with placebo treatment (2.3% for denosumab versus 7.2% for placebo, p=0.0001). In addition, women receiving denosumab experienced a statistically significant reduction (20%) in the incidence of new non-vertebral fractures compared with placebo treatment (6.5% for denosumab versus 8.0% for placebo, p=0.011) and a statistically significant reduction (40%) in the incidence of hip fractures compared with placebo treatment (0.7% for denosumab versus 1.2% for placebo, p=0.036), each a secondary endpoint. The incidence and types of both adverse and serious adverse events observed in this study, including serious infections and neoplasms, were similar between the denosumab and placebo groups. The most common adverse events across both treatment arms were arthralgia, back pain, hypertension and nasopharyngitis.

In addition to the detailed results of Study 216, we presented the results of two non-pivotal phase 3 studies of denosumab in osteoporosis at the ASBMR meeting. The first was a phase 3 head-to-head, double-blind trial known as the Study of Transitioning from AleNdronate to Denosumab trial (gSTANDh) (gStudy 234h). The results of this study demonstrated that subcutaneous injections of denosumab every six months achieved significantly greater increases in bone mineral density (gBMDh) versus those achieved with alendronate (gALNh) at all sites measured. For the primary endpoint, denosumab resulted in significant increases in BMD at the total hip compared with ALN (1.9% for denosumab versus 1.05% for ALN, p<0.0001). Treatment with denosumab also resulted in significant increases in BMD compared with continued ALN treatment at all secondary endpoints, including the lumbar spine, femoral neck, hip trochanter and 1/3 radius. The incidence and types of adverse events observed in the study, including neoplasms and infection, were similar between the denosumab and ALN treatment groups. The most common adverse events across both treatment arms were back pain, arthralgia and nasal pharyngitis. The second non-pivotal study was a head-to-head trial comparing denosumab to weekly oral ALN, also known as the Determining Efficacy: Comparison of Initiating Denosumab versus Alendronate trial (gDECIDEh) (gStudy 141h). As a part of this study, patients were given a questionnaire after 12 months of treatment to gauge preference on mode of administration as well as satisfaction with frequency of dosing of twice-yearly subcutaneous injections versus weekly oral tablet. More than three-quarters of patients in both study arms preferred subcutaneous injection over oral pills (77% versus 23%, p <0.0001). In addition, significantly more patients were more satisfied with twice-yearly dosing compared to weekly dosing (80% placebo injection versus 20% weekly oral ALN, and 79% for denosumab versus 21% weekly placebo tablet, p <0.0001 for both study groups).

Oncology

On July 14, 2008, we announced findings from a three-year pivotal phase 3 placebo-controlled trial evaluating denosumab in the treatment of bone loss in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (gADTh) for non-metastatic prostate cancer (gStudy 138h). In this study of more than 1,400 men, denosumab treatment produced statistically significantly greater increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (primary endpoint) and non-vertebral sites compared with placebo at multiple time points. These improvements in BMD were consistent with those seen in other denosumab studies evaluating BMD in women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor (gAIh) therapy, and in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. During the 36-month evaluation period, men receiving denosumab experienced less than half the incidence of new vertebral fractures (a secondary endpoint) compared with those receiving placebo, a statistically significant finding. Furthermore, in the denosumab arm there were fewer non-vertebral fractures over the 36-month period. The incidence and types of adverse events observed in this study were generally similar between the denosumab and placebo groups. The most common adverse events across both treatment arms were arthralgia, back pain, constipation and pain in extremity. Serious adverse infectious events occurred in approximately 5% of men receiving placebo treatment as compared with approximately 6% of those receiving denosumab.


œEPOGEN(R) (Epoetin alfa)
reduced red blood cell count can result in anemia (see g| Aranesp(R) (darbepoetin alfa)h). People with CRF suffer from anemia because they do not produce sufficient amounts of erythropoietin, which is normally produced in healthy kidneys.

We were granted an exclusive license to manufacture and market recombinant human erythropoietin in the United States under a licensing agreement with KA. We have retained exclusive rights to market EPOGEN(R) in the United States for dialysis patients. We granted Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (which has assigned its rights under the Product License Agreement to Ortho Biotech) a license to commercialize recombinant human erythropoietin as a human therapeutic in the United States in all markets other than dialysis (see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships | Johnson & Johnsonh).

We launched EPOGEN(R) in the United States in 1989 for the treatment of anemia associated with CRF for patients who are on dialysis. We market EPOGEN(R) for the treatment of anemic adult and pediatric patients with CRF who are on dialysis. EPOGEN(R) is indicated for elevating or maintaining the red blood cell level (as determined by hematocrit or Hb measurements) and decreasing the need for blood transfusions in these patients.

EPOGEN(R) sales in the United States were $2.5 billion for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008.

Our outstanding material patents for Epoetin alfa are described in the table below. 
Territory    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.    Process of making erythropoietin    8/15/2012 
U.S.    Product claims to erythropoietin    8/20/2013 
U.S.    Pharmaceutical compositions of erythropoietin    8/20/2013 
U.S.    Cells that make certain levels of erythropoietin    5/26/2015
Any products or technologies that are directly or indirectly successful in addressing anemia associated with CRF could negatively impact product sales of EPOGEN(R). In the United States, EPOGEN(R) and Aranesp(R) compete with each other, primarily in the U.S. hospital dialysis clinic setting, and there was a conversion from EPOGEN(R) to Aranesp(R) in this setting, however we believe that the conversion has stabilized. In addition, Affymax and Takeda are co-developing Hematide?, an ESA for the treatment of anemia in renal patients. FibroGen is developing FG-2216 and FG-4592, orally active ESAs for the treatment of anemia. Additionally, in December 2008, Merck announced the formation of a new biotech division, Merck Bioventures, which is developing a late stage pegylated ESA (MK-2578), which they have announced they expect to launch in 2012.
y2009 ESAsz

€kÎ On February 16, 2010, we announced that the FDA approved a REMS program for our ESAs. On February 16, 2010, Amgen and Centocor Ortho Biotech Products, L.P. ("Centocor Ortho Biotech Products"), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson ("J&J"), announced that the FDA approved a REMS for ESAs which includes Aranesp€@î , EPOGEN€@î and Procrit€@î (Epoetin alfa). The FDA has determined that a REMS is necessary for ESAs to ensure the benefits of these drugs outweigh the risks of shortened overall survival ("OS") and/or increased tumor progression or recurrence as identified in clinical studies in patients with breast, non-small cell lung, head and neck, lymphoid and cervical cancers. As part of the REMS, a medication guide explaining the risks and benefits of ESAs must be provided to all patients receiving ESAs. To ensure continued access to ESAs for healthcare providers who prescribe, or prescribe and dispense, ESAs to patients with cancer, providers are required to train and enroll in the ESA APPRISE (Assisting Providers and cancer Patients with Risk Information for the Safe use of ESAs) Oncology Program and to document that a discussion about the risks of ESAs took place with each patient prior to the initiation of each new course of ESA therapy. The ESA APPRISE Oncology Program will be launched on March 24, 2010. Direct patient registration or approval prior to ESA administration is not required through the ESA APPRISE Oncology Program.

€kÎ We published detailed results from the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Endpoints with Aranesp€@î Therapy ("TREAT") and updated the ESA labels to incorporate certain of the trial results regarding the increased risk of stroke and to reinforce the need to follow the approved label guidance to maintain appropriate hemoglobin ("Hb") levels. On December 16, 2009, after consultation with the FDA, Amgen and Centocor Ortho Biotech Products updated the safety information in the ESA product labeling to reflect certain results of our TREAT study. These changes include a revision to the BOXED WARNINGS section to include the increased risk of stroke and to reinforce the need to follow the approved label guidance to maintain Hb levels within the range of 10 to 12 grams per deciliter ("g/dL"). (See discussion of Aranesp€@î TREAT study results in "Research and Development and Selected Product Candidates.")

€kÎ The FDA announced that it will call an advisory committee meeting in 2010 to re-evaluate the use of ESAs to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease ("CKD") and could consider lowering targeted Hb levels and reducing approved dosing for ESAs.

€kÎ The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") has scheduled a Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee ("MEDCAC") meeting on March 24, 2010 to examine currently available evidence on the use of ESAs to manage anemia in patients who have CKD, which may consider the results of the TREAT study.

€kÎ The CMS released its proposed rule to implement the bundled prospective payment system for end stage renal disease ("ESRD"), which could impact reimbursement for EPOGEN€@î

y2008z

•nŒŒ—p–ò‚Ì‹£‡

Certain of our marketed products are under increased competitive pressures, including from biosimilar and other products in Europe, which compete or are expected to compete with Aranesp(R), Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R), as well as our marketed products in the United States, including ENBREL. For example, as a result of final regulatory guidelines issued by the EMEA in 2006 related to the development and approval of biosimilar products, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience increased competition throughout Europe, including from a number of biosimilar erythropoietin products, which compete with Aranesp(R). In addition, a number of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (gG-CSFh) biosimilar products have received marketing authorization from the European Commission in 2008 and early 2009 and have been or are expected to be launched and compete with Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R). Further in the United States, ENBREL will continue to face increased competition primarily due to the expected launch of new products.

“Á‹–ŒW‘ˆ

On October 17, 2008, the Massachusetts District Court entered judgment that the patents in suit are valid and enforceable, and that the patents, identified below as the subject of the permanent injunction, would be infringed by the import, use and sale of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (gRocheh) pegylated erythropoietin product in the United States. The Massachusetts District Court permanently enjoined Roche from infringing the e422 Patent, the e933 Patent, the e868 Patent and the e698 Patent for the remaining life of these patents. See Note 10, gContingencies | Roche Matters | Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. et al.h for further discussion of this legal proceeding.

On July 11, 2008, we announced that we had reached an agreement to settle our antitrust litigation with Ortho Biotech Products L.P., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (hereafter referred to as gOrtho Biotechh or gJ&Jh), which had alleged that discounts offered to oncology clinics on our NEUPOGEN(R) and Neulasta(R) and Aranesp(R) products violated antitrust laws. Under terms of the agreement, we paid Ortho Biotech $200 million and the pending litigation in New Jersey District Court was dismissed with prejudice.

y2008@ŠàƒŠƒXƒNzÔŒŒ‹…¶¬‘£i»ÜiESA»Üj‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä‚Ì2‚‚ÌV‚½‚ÈŽŽŒ±‚̃f[ƒ^‚É‚æ‚邯A‰»Šw—Ö@‚É‚æ‚é•nŒŒ‚ɑ΂µ‚ÄESA»Ü‚𓊗^‚³‚ꂽis‚µ‚½“ûŠàAŽq‹{èòŠà‚ÌŠ³ŽÒ‚ÍA“Š—^‚µ‚È‚¢Š³ŽÒ‚É”ä‚ׂĎ€–S‚܂ł̊úŠÔ‚ª’Zk‚µAŽîᇂ̑B‚ª‘‚Ü‚Á‚½Bi—ªj‚±‚ê‚ç2‚Â‚ÌŽŽŒ±‚ÍA‘O‰ñ2007”N11ŒŽFDA‚ªƒ‰ƒxƒ‹‰ü³‚ð‚µ‚½Œã‚ÌVƒf[ƒ^‚Å‚ ‚éB‘S8‚Â‚ÌŽŽŒ±‚ÅAгŽÒ‚̓wƒ‚ƒOƒƒrƒ“’l12g/dLˆÈã‚ð–Ú•W‚ÉESA»Ü‚𓊗^‚³‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚½‚ªA‚Ù‚Æ‚ñ‚ǂ̊³ŽÒ‚Í‚»‚Ì–Ú•W’l‚É‹y‚ñ‚Å‚¢‚È‚©‚Á‚½B@ˆã–ò•iˆÀ‘S«î•ñ Vol.6 No.26 i 2008/12/25 j@ˆã–ò•iˆÀ‘S«î•ñ Vol.6 No.20 i 2008/10/02 j

ESA Regulatory and Reimbursement Developments

The ESA regulatory and reimbursement developments in 2008 reflect a continuation of events that began in late 2006 that affected the class of ESA products, including Aranesp(R) and EPOGEN(R). Certain of the developments discussed below have had a material adverse impact on sales of our ESA products, in particular Aranesp(R) sales in the U.S. supportive cancer care setting.

Beginning in late 2006, adverse safety results involving ESA products were observed in various studies that were performed by us and by others (including our licensees or independent investigators) that explored the use of ESAs in settings different from those outlined in the FDA approved label, including targeting higher hemoglobin (gHbh) levels and/or use in non-approved patient populations. The results of these studies culminated in significant regulatory and reimbursement developments affecting the class of ESA products, including Aranesp(R) and EPOGEN(R). For example, in February 2007, following the reported results from our Anemia of Cancer phase 3 study (the gAoC 103 studyh), the United States Pharmacopoeia Dispensing Information (gUSP DIh) Drug Reference Guides removed Aranesp(R) in the treatment of anemia of cancer (gAoCh). Thereafter, Aranesp(R) use in AoC essentially ceased. In addition, during 2007, we had discussions with the FDA and other regulatory authorities and meetings with certain of the FDAfs advisory panels, which led to further developments. For example, in March 2007, the product labeling information for the class of ESAs was updated, including a boxed warning in the prescribing information (gPIh). In addition, in November 2007, following our meeting with the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (gODACh) in May 2007, various additional safety-related revisions were again made to the ESA label. Further, in July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (gCMSh) issued its National Coverage Decision Memorandum for Use of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in Cancer and Related Neoplastic Conditions (the gDecision Memorandumh). The Decision Memorandum established the ESA reimbursement policy for Medicare and other government beneficiaries who are treated for chemotherapy-induced anemia (gCIAh) with ESAs. We believe that the restrictions in the Decision Memorandum changed the way ESAs are used in clinical practice by decreasing the number of treated patients, the average dose and duration of ESA therapy.

Discussions with regulatory authorities, including the FDA, regarding safety concerns with respect to the administration of ESA products in various settings continued throughout 2008, resulting in further regulatory developments. The following is a summary of selected key regulatory and related developments that occurred in 2008.

During 2008, the ESA labeling information was further revised to reflect various safety concerns, beginning in March 2008, with an updated boxed warning in the labeling information in the United States. This updated box warning states that ESAs shorten overall survival and/or time-to-tumor progression in clinical studies in patients with breast, non-small cell lung, head and neck, lymphoid and cervical cancers when dosed to a target Hb level of greater than or equal to 12 grams per deciliter (gg/dLh). Additionally, on August 6, 2008, we revised the ESA product labeling, as the FDA directed, based on a complete response letter, received on July 30, 2008, from the FDA to the revisions to the ESA labeling we proposed following the March 13, 2008 ODAC meeting. The revised labeling included, among other things, (i) the addition to the boxed warning of a statement that ESAs are not indicated for patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy when the anticipated outcome of such therapy is cure, (ii) the addition of a statement in the DOSAGE and ADMINISTRATION section of the label that ESA therapy should not be initiated at Hb levels 3 10 g/dL and that dose should be adjusted to maintain the lowest Hb level sufficient to avoid red blood cell transfusions and (iii) the removal of reference to the upper safety limit of 12 g/dL. Further, following the closed meeting by the Scientific Advisory Group on Oncology (gSAG-Oh) in May 2008, we received notification in October 2008 that the European Commission had approved updates to the Aranesp(R) product information. The product information for all ESAs was updated to advise that in some clinical situations blood transfusions should be the preferred treatment for the management of anemia in patients with cancer and that the decision to administer ESAs should be based on a benefit-risk assessment with the participation of the individual patient. This assessment should take into account the specific clinical context, including the type of tumor and its stage, the degree of anemia, life-expectancy, the environment in which the patient is being treated and patient preference.

In addition, on January 1, 2008, the CMSf revisions to its Erythropoietin Monitoring Policy (gEMPh) became effective, which require a 50% reduction in Medicare reimbursement if a patientfs Hb level is above 13 g/dL for three or more consecutive months. In addition, the EMP reduces the monthly dosing limits to 400,000 international units (gIUsh) of EPOGEN(R), from 500,000 IUs, and to 1,200 micrograms (gmcgsh) of Aranesp(R), from 1,500 mcgs. We believe that the EMP implementation in January 2008 has significantly affected physician behavior resulting in declines in dosing trends as particularly noted in the quarter of implementation. However, this dose decline subsequently stabilized in 2008 but may further fluctuate in the future.

Further, on September 30, 2008, we announced that we had received a summary of preliminary results from the Cochrane Collaborationfs independent meta-analysis of patient-level data from previously conducted, randomized, controlled, clinical studies evaluating ESAs in cancer patients which we submitted to the FDA and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products (gEMEAh). These results were also presented by the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group in December at the 2008 American Society of Hematology (gASHh) Congress.

This Cochrane meta-analysis of patient level data from previous studies corroborates prior analyses indicating that the use of ESAs may increase the risk of death in cancer patients. The studies in the analysis all predate the current label, which advises using the least amount of ESA necessary to avoid transfusion.

The analyses on all cancer patients were based on 53 previously conducted studies involving 13,933 patients. None of these studies utilized ESAs according to current label guidance. The overall survival results corroborate an earlier review by the Cochrane Collaboration, published in 2006, which is included in the WARNINGS section of the current U.S. PI (Hazard Ratio (gHRh): 1.08 [95% Confidence Interval (gCIh) 0.99 - 1.18]). The ESA treatment arm had increased on-study deaths (HR: 1.17 [95% CI 1.06 - 1.30]) and decreased overall survival (HR: 1.06 [95% CI 1.00 - 1.12]) compared to controls. The analyses on patients undergoing chemotherapy, the cancer indication for which ESAs are approved, were based on 38 studies with 10,441 patients. None of these studies utilized ESAs according to current label guidance. The ESA treatment arm had increased on-study deaths (HR: 1.10 [95% CI 0.98 - 1.24]) and decreased overall survival (HR: 1.04 [95% CI 0.97 - 1.11]) compared to controls. While neither of these results is statistically significant, they do not exclude the potential for adverse outcomes when ESAs are prescribed according to the current label. The final report on these endpoints is expected in 2009.

Our ESA products will continue to face future challenges. For example, we continue to work with the FDA to finalize a new protocol for a clinical trial to determine the effects of ESAs on survival and tumor outcomes in anemic patients with metastatic cancer receiving concomitant myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We have submitted an Aranesp(R) study protocol to the FDA and plan to initiate the study in 2009. In addition, in response to the FDAfs request under authority prescribed by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (the gFDAAAh), we continue to work closely with the FDA to develop a REMS program for the class of ESA products. We have submitted a proposed REMS in response to the FDAfs requests. The components of the REMS approved by the FDA could be different for the use of ESAs in the oncology and nephrology indications. We believe that a REMS program for our ESA products could have a material adverse impact on the future sales of Aranesp(R), especially in the U.S. supportive cancer care setting. Additionally, future Aranesp(R) sales could also be materially adversely impacted by further changes in reimbursement, including as a result of future regulatory developments. @

y2006z

EPOGEN(R) is Amgen's registered trademark for its recombinant human erythropoietin product, a protein that stimulates red blood cell production. A reduced red blood cell count can result in anemia (see g| Aranesp(R) (darbepoetin alfa)h). People with chronic renal failure suffer from anemia because they do not produce sufficient amounts of erythropoietin, which is normally produced in healthy kidneys.

We were granted an exclusive license to manufacture and market recombinant human erythropoietin in the United States under a licensing agreement with KA. We have retained exclusive rights to market EPOGEN(R) in the United States for dialysis patients. We granted Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (which has assigned its rights under the Product License Agreement to Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, hereafter referred to as gOrtho Biotech Products, L.P.h or gJohnson & Johnsonh) a license to commercialize recombinant human erythropoietin as a human therapeutic in the United States in all markets other than dialysis Table of Contents(see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships | Johnson & Johnsonh). Johnson & Johnson markets recombinant human erythropoietin under the trademark PROCRIT(R) in the United States (see Note 1, gSummary of significant accounting policies ? Product salesh to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

We launched EPOGEN(R) in the United States in 1989 for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure for patients who are on dialysis. EPOGEN(R) is approved for the treatment of anemic adult and pediatric patients with chronic renal failure who are on dialysis. EPOGEN(R) is indicated to elevate or maintain the red blood cell level (as determined by hematocrit or hemoglobin measurements) and to decrease the need for blood transfusions in these patients.

EPOGEN(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $2,511 million, $2,455 million and $2,601 million, respectively.

y2006z•nŒŒ—p–ò‚Ì‹£‡

We are committed to growing our anemia business and maintaining our leadership in anemia management, which includes impacting patient health outcomes and supporting the development of new standards of care, exploring new technologies in anemia therapy, preparing to compete with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (gRocheh) in the U.S. and with biosimilar and other competing products in Europe and defending our intellectual property. Roche is developing a pegylated recombinant human erythropoietin (gpeg-EPOh) for which they have filed a biologic license application (gBLAh) with the FDA and, according to Roche's public statements, they expect to launch the molecule in the U.S. nephrology segment in 2007 despite our ongoing lawsuit and their acknowledgement of our U.S. erythropoietin patents

Certain of our products are expected to face competition in certain geographic areas from biosimilar products. Our principal European patent relating to erythropoietin expired on December 12, 2004 and our principal European patent relating to G-CSF expired on August 22, 2006. We believe that as these patents have expired, other companies could receive approval for and market biosimilar products to compete with our products in the European Union (gEUh). (See gItem 1A. Risk Factors - Our marketed products face substantial competition and other companies may discover, develop, acquire or commercialize products before or more successfully than we do.h)

While we do not market EPOGEN(R) in Europe as this right belongs to Johnson & Johnson (through KA), we do market Aranesp(R) in the EU, which competes with Johnson & Johnson's EPREX(R) product, Roche's NeoRecormon(R) product and others' erythropoietin products. We expect that biosimilar erythropoietin products may be approved in the EU in 2007 and could be available in the EU shortly after approval. Based on an announcement by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc ("Shire"), we expect that a competing erythropoietin product, manufactured by Shire, may appear on the market in the EU in 2007. In addition, Roche is developing its peg-EPO product which, upon regulatory approval, we expect they will launch in the EU nephrology segment in 2007. In 2006, the European Medicines Agency (gEMEAh) developed and issued final regulatory guidelines related to the development and approval of biosimilar products. The final guidelines included clinical trial guidance for certain biosimilar products including erythropoietins and G-CSFs, which guidance recommends that applicants seeking approval of such biosimilar products conduct fairly extensive pharmacodynamic, toxicological, clinical safety studies and a pharmacovigilance program. In the United States, there currently is no legal approval pathway for follow-on biologic products. A number of events would need to occur before these products could enter the market, including passage of legislation by Congress to create a new approval pathway and promulgation of associated regulations and guidance by the FDA.


œAranesp(R) (darbepoetin alfa)
Aranesp(R) is our registered trademark for one of our ESAs, a protein that stimulates red blood cell production. Red blood cells transport oxygen to all cells of the body. Without adequate amounts of erythropoietin, the red blood cell count is reduced. A deficient red blood cell count can result in anemia, a condition where insufficient oxygen is delivered to the bodyfs organs and tissues. Anemia can be associated with CRF, both in patients on dialysis and not on dialysis. Anemia can also result from chemotherapy treatments for patients with non-myeloid malignancies.

We were granted an exclusive license by Kirin-Amgen, Inc. (gKAh), a joint venture between Kirin Holdings Company, Limited (gKirinh) and Amgen (see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships ? Kirin Holdings Company, Limitedh), to manufacture and market darbepoetin alfa in the United States, all European countries, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, all Central and South American countries and certain countries in Central Asia, North Africa and the Middle East.

We market Aranesp(R) primarily in the United States and Europe. Aranesp(R) was initially launched in 2001 in the United States and Europe for the treatment of anemia associated with CRF (both in patients on dialysis and patients not on dialysis) and is also indicated for the treatment of CIA in patients with non-myeloid malignancies.

Worldwide Aranesp(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $2.65 billion, $3.1 billion, $3.6 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, U.S. Aranesp€@î sales were $1.25 billion, $1.65 billion and $2.15 billion, respectively and international Aranesp€@î sales were $1.40 billion, $1.49 billion and $1.46 billion, respectively.
As a result of certain of the regulatory and reimbursement developments discussed above in the gKey Developmentsh section, worldwide Aranesp(R) sales and, in particular, sales in the U.S. supportive cancer care setting, have and will continue to be materially adversely affected.

Our outstanding material patents for darbepoetin alfa are described in the table below. 

Territory    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.    Glycosylation analogs of erythropoietin proteins    5/15/2024 
Europe(1)    Glycosylation analogs of erythropoietin proteins    10/12/2010 
Europe(1)    Glycosylation analogs of erythropoietin proteins    8/16/2014 
(1) In some cases, these European patents may also be entitled to supplemental protection in one or more countries in Europe and the length of any such extension will vary by country.

Our principal European patent relating to Epoetin alfa expired on December 12, 2004. Although we do not market EPOGEN(R) in Europe, upon expiration of this patent, some companies have and other companies may receive approval for and market biosimilar or other products to compete with Aranesp(R) in Europe, presenting additional competition, as further discussed below.

Any products or technologies that are directly or indirectly successful in addressing anemia associated with chemotherapy and nephrology could negatively impact product sales of Aranesp(R). The following table reflects companies and their currently marketed products that primarily compete with Aranesp(R) in the United States and Europe in the supportive cancer care and nephrology segments, unless otherwise indicated.

Territory    Competitor Marketed Product    Competitor 
U.S.    PROCRIT(R)(1)    Centocor Ortho Biotech Products(2)
Europe    EPREXR/ERYPO(R)    Janssen-Cilag(2) 
Europe    NeoRecormon(R)    Roche 
Europe    Retacrit(TM)(3)/Silapo(R)(3)    Hospira Enterprises B.V. (gHospirah)/Stada Arzneimittel AG (gStadah)
Europe    BinocritR(3)/Epoetin alfa Hexal(R)(3)/Abseamed(R)(3)
    Sandoz GmbH (gSandozh)/Hexal Biotech Forschungs GmbH (gHexalh)/Medice Arzneimittel Putter GmbH & Company KG (gMediceh)
Europe    MIRCERA(R)(4)     Roche 
Europe    Dynepo(R)(5)     Shire Pharmaceutical Group Plc (gShireh) 
Europe Biopoin€@î CT Arztneimittel GmbH ("CT Arztneimittel")
(1) In the United States, Aranesp(R) competes with PROCRIT(R) in the supportive cancer care and pre-dialysis settings. 
(2) A subsidiary of J&J. 
(3) Biosimilar product approved and launched in certain EU countries. 
(4) Competes with Aranesp(R) in the nephrology segment only. 
(5) Shire announced in the second quarter of 2008 that it had decided to stop the commercialization of Dynepo(R). 
In the United States, Aranesp(R) also competes with EPOGEN(R), primarily in the U.S. hospital dialysis clinic setting. In addition to competition from the above-noted marketed products, the following product candidates could compete with Aranesp(R) in the future. Affymax Inc. (gAffymaxh) and Takeda are co-developing Hematide?, an ESA for the treatment of anemia in renal patients. FibroGen is developing FG-2216 and FG-4592, orally active ESAs, for the treatment of anemia and is also studying FG-4592 for the treatment in anemia of chronic kidney disease (gCKDh). Ratiopharm is developing a biosimilar ESA, EpoTheta, expected to launch in the EU in 2009. Additionally, in December 2008, Merck & Company, Inc. (gMerckh) announced the formation of a new biotech division, Merck Bioventures, which is developing a late-stage pegylated ESA (MK-2578), which they have announced they expect to launch in 2012.
y2009z
y2008z
y2006zAranesp(R) is Amgen's registered trademark for one of its novel erythropoiesis stimulating proteins, a protein that stimulates red blood cell production. Red blood cells transport oxygen to all cells of the body. Without adequate amounts of erythropoietin, the red blood cell count is reduced. A deficient red blood cell count could result in anemia, a condition where insufficient oxygen is delivered to the body's organs and tissues. Anemia can be associated with chronic renal failure, both in patients on dialysis and not on dialysis. Anemia can also result from chemotherapy treatments for patients with non-myeloid malignancies. Aranesp(R) relieves anemia symptoms and reduces the need for blood transfusions.

We were granted an exclusive license by Kirin-Amgen, Inc. (gKAh), a joint venture between Kirin Brewery Company, Limited (gKirinh) and Amgen (see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships - Kirin Brewery Company, Limitedh) to manufacture and market darbepoetin alfa in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, all Central and South American countries and certain countries in Central Asia, North Africa and the Middle East.

We primarily market Aranesp(R) in the United States and Europe. Darbepoetin alfa is also marketed under the brand name Nespo(R) in Italy. Aranesp(R) was initially launched in 2001 in the United States and Europe and is indicated for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure (both in patients on dialysis and patients not on dialysis) as well as for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies. In March 2006, the FDA approved label changes to include every-three-week dosing of Aranesp(R) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies.

Worldwide Aranesp(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $4,121 million, $3,273 million and $2,473 million, respectively.


œENBREL
ENBREL is our registered trademark for our TNF receptor fusion protein that inhibits its binding to TNF receptors, which can result in a significant reduction in inflammatory activity. TNF is one of the chemical messengers that help regulate the inflammatory process. When the body produces too much TNF, it overwhelms the immune systemfs ability to control inflammation of the joints or of psoriasis-affected skin areas. ENBREL is similar to a protein that the body produces naturally, and like this protein, it binds and deactivates certain TNF molecules before they can trigger inflammation.

We acquired the rights to ENBREL in July 2002 as part of our acquisition of Immunex Corporation (gImmunexh).

We market ENBREL under a co-promotion agreement with Wyeth in the United States and Canada (see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships ? Wyethh). The rights to market ENBREL outside of the United States and Canada are reserved to Wyeth. ENBREL was initially launched in November 1998 by Immunex for the treatment of RA. In addition, ENBREL is now indicated for the treatment of adult patients with the following conditions: moderately to severely active RA; chronic moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy; active psoriatic arthritis and active ankylosing spondylitis. ENBREL is also approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active polyarticular-course juvenile RA in patients who have had an inadequate response to one or more disease-modifying medicines.

ENBREL sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $3.6 billion, $3.2 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively.

Our outstanding material patents for etanercept are described in the table below. 
Territory    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.    Methods of treating TNF ? dependent inflammatory response    9/5/2009 
U.S.    TNFR proteins and pharmaceutical compositions    9/5/2009 
U.S.    TNFR DNA vectors, cells and processes for making proteins    10/23/2012 
Any products or technologies that are directly or indirectly successful in treating rheumatology, which includes moderate to severe RA, moderate to severe juvenile RA and psoriatic arthritis; and dermatology, which includes ankylosing spondylitis and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, could negatively impact product sales of ENBREL. Current treatments for these indications include generic methotrexate and other products, as further discussed below.

The following table reflects companies and their currently marketed products that primarily compete with ENBREL in the United States and Canada in the inflammatory disease setting.

Territory    Therapeutic Area    Competitor/Marketed Product    Competitor
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology & Dermatology    REMICADE(R)    Centocor, Inc.(1)/Schering Plough Corporation
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology & Dermatology    HUMIRA(R)    Abbott Laboratories (gAbbotth)
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology & Dermatology    Trexall(TM)    Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(2)
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology    Orencia(R)    Bristol-Myers Squibb Corporation (gBMSh)
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology    Arava(R)    Sanofi-Aventis
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology    Rheumatrex(R)    DAVA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
U.S. & Canada    Rheumatology    Rituxan(R)    Genentech, Inc. (gGenentechh)
U.S. & Canada    Dermatology    Raptiva(R)    Genentech
U.S. & Canada    Dermatology    Amevive(R)    Biogen IDEC Inc. (gBiogenh)
U.S. & Canada    Dermatology    Neoral(R)    Novartis AG (gNovartish)
U.S. & Canada    Dermatology    Soriatane(R)    Connetics Corporation(3)
(1) A subsidiary of J&J. 
(2) A subsidiary of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (gBarrh) 
(3) A subsidiary of Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. 
In addition to competition from the above-noted marketed products, various companies are developing products which may compete with ENBREL in the future, including the following. In December 2007, J&J filed a BLA with the FDA and a market authorization application (gMAAh) with the EMEA for CNTO 1275 (ustekinumab) to treat adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Although the DODAC unanimously recommended CNTO 1275 for approval, in December 2008, the FDA declined approval and requested additional information from J&J. J&J is also developing CNTO 148 (golimumab) for the treatment of RA. Additionally, a number of companies have cytokine inhibitors in development, including GlaxoSmithKline plc (gGlaxoSmithKlineh), Pfizer Inc. (gPfizerh), Repligen Corporation and Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Roche filed a BLA for its RA candidate Actemra (tocilizumab) in November 2007 and received a complete response letter from the FDA in September 2008, requesting additional data on the labeling and manufacture of the drug. Abbott is developing ABT-874, which is a psoriasis drug, and is in phase 3 trials. UCB has partnered with Nektar Therapeutics to develop Cimzia(R) (PEGylated anti-TNF) for the treatment of RA. On January 5, 2009, the FDA issued a complete response letter relating to the BLA of Cimzia(R) for treatment of RA requesting additional information.
y2009z
y2008z
y2008ˆÀ‘S«–â‘èzOn March 17, 2008, we and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, a division of Wyeth, announced updates to the FDA approved labeling for ENBREL, in which the U.S. PI now contains a boxed warning relating to the risk of infections, including tuberculosis. This information in the boxed warning includes additional language regarding screening and monitoring patients for tuberculosis, including patients who tested negative for latent tuberculosis infection. As part of this labeling update, the FDA also required the implementation of a REMS for ENBREL in the form of a medication guide. Additionally, following the FDA web-alert on September 4, 2008 regarding their review of histoplasmosis and other opportunistic fungal infections in patients treated with TNF-blockers, the FDA requested that the boxed warning and WARNINGS sections of the U.S. PI and the medication guide for ENBREL (and other TNF-blockers) be strengthened to include the risk of unrecognized histoplasmosis and other invasive fungal infections with the goal of increasing timely diagnosis and treatment. The FDA also requested that the approved REMS for ENBREL be modified with a communication plan to healthcare providers regarding the risk of unrecognized fungal infections. In December 2008, we agreed with the FDA on the required revisions to the U.S. PI, and we continue to work with the FDA to finalize the requested updates to the ENBREL REMS.

In addition, there are several other outstanding regulatory matters that may also negatively impact future ENBREL product sales. For example, on June 4, 2008, the FDA issued an Early Communication regarding an ongoing safety review of TNF-blockers and the possible association between the use of these medicines and the development of lymphoma and other cancers in children and young adults and stated that it had decided to conduct further analyses to evaluate the risk and benefits of TNF-blockers in pediatric patients. Furthermore, following the June 18, 2008 Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee (gDODACh) meeting, on July 24, 2008, we received notification from the FDA through a complete response letter that they would like additional information from us regarding the use of ENBREL in pediatric patients with chronic moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. We continue to work with the FDA to provide it with the above-noted requested information.


œNeulasta(R) (pegfilgrastim)/NEUPOGEN(R) (Filgrastim)
Neulasta(R) is our registered trademark for a pegylated protein that selectively stimulates production of certain white blood cells known as neutrophils and is based on the Filgrastim molecule. Neutrophils defend against infection. NEUPOGEN(R) is our registered trademark for our recombinant-methionyl human G-CSF, a protein that also selectively stimulates production of neutrophils. Treatments for various diseases and diseases themselves can result in extremely low numbers of neutrophils, a condition called neutropenia. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy, one treatment option for individuals with certain types of cancers, targets cell types that grow rapidly, such as tumor cells. Normal cells that divide rapidly, such as those in the bone marrow that become neutrophils, are also vulnerable to the effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy, resulting in neutropenia with an increased risk of severe infection. Very often, neutropenia is the dose limiting side effect of chemotherapy and can thus be responsible for a reduction in the amount of chemotherapy that can be administered safely. Such reductions in chemotherapy dose can compromise the effectiveness of chemotherapy on the cancer it is being used to treat, with the result of a higher treatment failure rate. As mentioned above, the pegfilgrastim molecule is based on the Filgrastim molecule. A polyethylene glycol molecule (gPEGh) is added to enlarge the Filgrastim molecule, thereby extending its half-life and causing it to be removed more slowly from the body. Because pegfilgrastim is eliminated through binding to its receptor on neutrophils and their precursors, pegfilgrastim remains in the circulation until neutrophil recovery has occurred. This neutrophil-mediated clearance allows for administration as a single dose per chemotherapy cycle, compared with NEUPOGEN(R), which requires more frequent dosing. Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R) are prescribed more frequently in the curative setting, in which myelosuppressive chemotherapy is administered with the intent to cure cancer, rather than in the palliative setting, in which myelosuppressive chemotherapy is administered to treat other complications of cancer by managing tumor growth.

We were granted an exclusive license to manufacture and market pegfilgrastim and G-CSF in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand under a licensing agreement with KA (see gJoint Ventures and Business Relationships ? Kirin Holdings Company, Limitedh).

We market Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R) primarily in the United States and Europe. Filgrastim is also marketed under the brand name GRANULOKINE(R) in Italy. Neulasta(R) was initially launched in the United States and Europe in 2002 and is indicated for reducing the incidence of infection associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in cancer patients with non-myeloid malignancies. Administration of Neulasta(R) in all cycles of chemotherapy is approved for patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with at least a 17% risk of febrile neutropenia. NEUPOGEN(R) was initially launched in the United States and Europe in 1991. NEUPOGEN(R) is indicated for reducing the incidence of infection as manifested by febrile neutropenia for patients with non-myeloid malignancies undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy; reducing the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related consequences for patients with non-myeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation; reducing the incidence and duration of neutropenia-related consequences in symptomatic patients with congenital neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia or idiopathic neutropenia (collectively, severe chronic neutropenia); mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells (gPBPCh) in cancer patients who have undergone myeloablative chemotherapy for stem cell transplantation; and reducing the recovery time of neutrophils and the duration of fever following induction or consolidation chemotherapy treatment in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (gAMLh).

Worldwide Neulasta(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $3.3 billion, $3.0 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively. Worldwide NEUPOGEN(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $1.3 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.

Our outstanding material patents for pegfilgrastim are described in the table below. 
Territory    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.    Pegylated G-CSF    10/20/2015 
Europe(1)     Pegylated G-CSF    2/8/2015 
(1) In some cases, this European patent may also be entitled to supplemental protection in one or more countries in Europe and the length of any such extension will vary by country.

Our outstanding material patents for Filgrastim are described in the table below. 

Territory    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.    G-CSF polypeptides    12/3/2013 
U.S.    Methods of treatment using G-CSF polypeptides    12/10/2013 
Our principal European patent relating to G-CSF expired on August 22, 2006. Upon expiration of this patent, some companies have and other companies may receive approval for and market biosimilar products and other products to compete with Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R) in Europe, presenting additional competition, as further discussed below.

Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R) could face competition in some circumstances from companies marketing or developing treatments for neutropenia associated with chemotherapy, for bone marrow and PBPC transplant patients, and AML. NEUPOGEN(R) competes with Neulasta(R) in the United States and Europe. U.S. and international NEUPOGEN(R) sales have been adversely impacted by conversion to Neulasta(R). However, we believe that the conversion in the United States is substantially complete and that a significant amount of the conversion in Europe had already occurred.

The following table reflects companies and their currently marketed products that primarily compete with Neulasta(R) and NEUPOGEN(R) in the United States and Europe in the supportive cancer care segment.

Territory    Competitor Marketed Product    Competitor
U.S.    Leukine(R)    Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals 
Europe    Granocyte(R)    Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd./Sanofi-Aventis
Europe    RatiograstimR(1)/Filgrastim RatiopharmR(1)    Ratiopharm 
Europe    BiograstimR(1)    CT Arzneimittel 
Europe    TevagrastimR(2)    Teva 
Europe    ZarzioR(3)/Filgrastim HexalR(3)    Sandoz/Hexal 
(1) Biosimilar products that received marketing authorization by the European Commission in September 2008 and launched in certain EU countries thereafter.
(2) Biosimilar product that received marketing authorization by the European Commission in September 2008 for which Teva has stated that it would begin marketing throughout Europe in 2009.
(3) Biosimilar products that received marketing authorization by the European Commission in February 2009.
y2009z
y2008z

œSensipar(R) (cinacalcet)
Sensipar(R) is our registered trademark in the United States and Mimpara(R) is our registered trademark in Europe, for our first small molecule medicine used in treating CKD patients on dialysis who produce too much parathyroid hormone, a condition known as secondary hyperparathyroidism. In 2004, SensiparR/Mimpara(R) was approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD patients on dialysis and for the treatment of hypercalcemia in patients with parathyroid carcinoma. We market Sensipar(R)/Mimpara(R) primarily in the United States and Europe.

Sensipar(R) sales for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $597 million, $463 million and $321 million, respectively.

Our outstanding material patents for cinacalcet are described in the table below. 
Cinacalcet    General Subject Matter    Expiration 
U.S.(1)    Calcium receptor-active molecules    10/23/2015 
U.S.(1)    Calcium receptor-active molecules    12/14/2016 
U.S.(1)    Methods of treatment    12/14/2016 
Europe(2)    Calcium receptor-active molecules    10/23/2015 
(1) An application for patent term extension has been submitted and is currently pending in the United States.
(2) In some cases, this European patent may also be entitled to supplemental protection in one or more countries in Europe and the length of any such extension will vary by country.

Any products or technologies that are directly or indirectly successful in treating secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with CKD on dialysis and/or hypercalcemia in patients with parathyroid carcinoma could negatively impact product sales of SensiparR/Mimpara(R).

The following table reflects companies and their currently marked products that primarily compete with Sensipar(R) in the United States and Mimpara(R) in Europe in the nephrology segment.

Territory    Competitor Marketed Product    Competitor
U.S.    Zemplar(R)    Abbott 
U.S.    Hectorol(R)    Genzyme Corporation (gGenzymeh) 
U.S.    Rocaltrol(R)    Roche 
Europe    Zemplar(R)    Abbott 
Europe    Renegel(R)    Genzyme 
Europe    Fosrenol(R)    Shire 
Europe    OsvaRen(R)    Fresenius Medical Care 
On July 25, 2008, we filed a lawsuit against Teva and Barr for infringement of four Sensipar(R) patents. The lawsuit is based on the Abbreviated New Drug Application (gANDAh) filed by Teva and Barr which seeks approval to market generic versions of Sensipar(R). (See Note 10, gContingenciesh to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) These generic versions could compete with Sensipar(R) in the future.
y2009z

œ
y2009z


š“Á‹–
ProductGeneral Subject MatterExpiration
Epoetin alfaU.S.| Process of making erythropoietin8/15/2012
| Product claims to erythropoietin8/20/2013
| Pharmaceutical compositions of erythropoietin8/20/2013
| Cells that make certain levels of erythropoietin5/26/2015
darbepoetin alfaEurope(2)| Glycosylation analogs of erythropoietin proteins10/12/2010
| Glycosylation analogs of erythropoietin proteins8/16/2014
FilgrastimU.S.| G-CSF polypeptides12/3/2013
| Methods of treatment using G-CSF polypeptides12/10/2013
pegfilgrastimU.S.| Pegylated G-CSF10/20/2015
Europe(2)| Pegylated G-CSF2/8/2015
etanerceptU.S.| Methods of treating TNF | dependent inflammatory response9/5/2009
| TNFR proteins and pharmaceutical compositions9/5/2009
| TNFR DNA vectors, cells and processes for making proteins10/23/2012
panitumumabU.S.| Human monoclonal antibodies to EGFr5/5/2017
cinacalcet HClU.S.(1)| Calcium receptor-active molecules12/14/2016
| Calcium receptor-active molecules12/14/2016
| Calcium receptor-active molecules12/14/2016
| Calcium receptor-active molecules10/23/2015
Europe(2)| Calcium receptor-active molecules10/23/2015
(1) An application for patent term extension has been submitted and is currently pending in the U.S. (2) In some cases these European patents may also be entitled to supplemental protection in one or more countries in Europe and the length of any such extension will vary country by country
œAmgen

œMedia Center šPress ReleasesAbgenix Press Release ArchivesTularik Press Release ArchivesImmunex Press Release Archives œMedical Professionals šProducts œInvestors šPipeline šFact Sheet`Žl”¼Šú•ñASEC šSEC Filings 10-K Annual Report 2009[2010.3.01] - [pdf] - [doc] - [xls] 10-K Annual Report 2008[2009.2.27] - [pdf,358p] - [doc] 10-K Annual Report 2007[2008.2.28] - [pdf,213p] 10-K Annual Report 2006[2007.2.28] - [pdf,149p] 10-K Annual 2005[2006.3.10] - [pdf,319p] - [xls] 10-K Annual 2004[2005.3.9] - [pdf,140p]| [xls]| [doc] šAnnual reports Annual Report and 10-K[2009.3.17;pdf,190p] Annual Report 2006 - [pdf,38p] Annual 2004 10-K[pdf,124p] Annual Report 2004[pdf,38p] - Online”Å Annual Report 2003 Annual Report 2002 Annual Report 2001 Amgen's Fourth Quarter 2006 Revenue Increased 17% to $3.8 Billion; Full Year 2006 Revenue Increased 15% to $14.3 Billion[2007.1.25] Amgen's Fourth Quarter 2003 Adjusted Earnings Per Share Increased 31 Percent to 46 Cents[pdf-11p,2004.1.22] AMGEN REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL YEAR 2001 FINANCIAL RESULTS IN LINE WITH GUIDANCE[2002.1.23] On An Adjusted Basis, Amgen Repor